Klaus Hopster, Joao Henrique Neves Soares, David Levine, Kyla Ortved, Bernd Driessen, Joaquin Araos
{"title":"Flow-controlled expiration improves gas exchange in anaesthetised horses undergoing orthopaedic surgery.","authors":"Klaus Hopster, Joao Henrique Neves Soares, David Levine, Kyla Ortved, Bernd Driessen, Joaquin Araos","doi":"10.1111/evj.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) has been shown to significantly enhance oxygenation in horses under laboratory conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to corroborate these findings by evaluating the effects of FLEX on gas exchange in a randomised clinical trial involving a large population of clinical horses undergoing orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective randomised clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 406 healthy adult horses scheduled for elective orthopaedic procedures were recruited for this prospective clinical trial. Horses were randomly assigned to FLEX or VCV (volume-controlled ventilation) groups in dorsal (VCV-D and FLEX-D) or lateral recumbency (VCV-L and FLEX-L). Arterial blood gases were measured at 30, 75, and 120 min post-induction to assess arterial oxygenation (arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen ratio, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>). A global index of ventilation/perfusion matching ([PaCO<sub>2</sub> - ETCO<sub>2</sub>]/PaCO<sub>2</sub>) was also calculated. Peak airway pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>) and tidal volume were measured to calculate dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn). Data were compared with repeated-measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Horses ventilated with FLEX showed significantly higher PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 369 ± 42 vs. 198 ± 112 mmHg, p < 0.001; FLEX-L vs. VCV-L, 436 ± 38 vs. 249 ± 88 mmHg, p < 0.001). FLEX also improved Cdyn (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 0.81 ± 0.1 vs. 0.64 ± 0.12, p = 0.01) and the global V̇/Q̇ index ([PaCO<sub>2</sub> - ETCO<sub>2</sub>]/PaCO<sub>2</sub>) (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.18 ± 0.03, p = 0.03) in dorsal-positioned but not lateral-positioned horses.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Anaesthesia protocols were not standardised; anaesthetists were not masked to the intervention of interest, and findings may not be generalisable to other patient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results confirm previous laboratory findings, demonstrating that FLEX improves oxygenation, ventilation-perfusion matching, and respiratory mechanics compared to VCV in a large clinical population of anaesthetised horses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) has been shown to significantly enhance oxygenation in horses under laboratory conditions.
Objective: This study aims to corroborate these findings by evaluating the effects of FLEX on gas exchange in a randomised clinical trial involving a large population of clinical horses undergoing orthopaedic surgery.
Study design: Prospective randomised clinical trial.
Methods: A total of 406 healthy adult horses scheduled for elective orthopaedic procedures were recruited for this prospective clinical trial. Horses were randomly assigned to FLEX or VCV (volume-controlled ventilation) groups in dorsal (VCV-D and FLEX-D) or lateral recumbency (VCV-L and FLEX-L). Arterial blood gases were measured at 30, 75, and 120 min post-induction to assess arterial oxygenation (arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen ratio, PaO2/FiO2). A global index of ventilation/perfusion matching ([PaCO2 - ETCO2]/PaCO2) was also calculated. Peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and tidal volume were measured to calculate dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn). Data were compared with repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results: Horses ventilated with FLEX showed significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 369 ± 42 vs. 198 ± 112 mmHg, p < 0.001; FLEX-L vs. VCV-L, 436 ± 38 vs. 249 ± 88 mmHg, p < 0.001). FLEX also improved Cdyn (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 0.81 ± 0.1 vs. 0.64 ± 0.12, p = 0.01) and the global V̇/Q̇ index ([PaCO2 - ETCO2]/PaCO2) (FLEX-D vs. VCV-D, 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.18 ± 0.03, p = 0.03) in dorsal-positioned but not lateral-positioned horses.
Main limitations: Anaesthesia protocols were not standardised; anaesthetists were not masked to the intervention of interest, and findings may not be generalisable to other patient populations.
Conclusions: These results confirm previous laboratory findings, demonstrating that FLEX improves oxygenation, ventilation-perfusion matching, and respiratory mechanics compared to VCV in a large clinical population of anaesthetised horses.
背景:流动控制呼气(FLEX)已被证明在实验室条件下显著增强马的氧合。目的:本研究旨在通过在一项随机临床试验中评估FLEX对气体交换的影响来证实这些发现,该试验涉及大量接受骨科手术的临床马匹。研究设计:前瞻性随机临床试验。方法:共招募406匹健康成年马进行选择性矫形手术,用于这项前瞻性临床试验。马被随机分配到仰卧(VCV- d和FLEX- d)或侧卧(VCV- l和FLEX- l)的FLEX或VCV(容积控制通气)组。在诱导后30,75和120min测量动脉血气以评估动脉氧合(动脉氧分压与吸入氧分数之比,PaO2/FiO2)。计算通气/灌注匹配全局指数([PaCO2 - ETCO2]/PaCO2)。测量峰值气道压力(Ppeak)和潮气量,计算动态呼吸系统顺应性(Cdyn)。数据采用重复测量方差分析进行比较。结果:使用FLEX通气的马在背侧位的PaO2/FiO2 (FLEX- d vs. VCV-D, 369±42 vs. 198±112 mmHg, p 2 - ETCO2]/PaCO2)显著高于侧侧位的马(FLEX- d vs. VCV-D, 0.11±0.03 vs. 0.18±0.03,p = 0.03)。主要局限性:麻醉方案不规范;麻醉师并没有掩盖干预的兴趣,研究结果可能不能推广到其他患者群体。结论:这些结果证实了之前的实验室发现,表明在大量临床麻醉马匹中,与VCV相比,FLEX改善了氧合、通气-灌注匹配和呼吸力学。
期刊介绍:
Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.