Reducing applied force in colonoscopy using a novel soft robotic colonoscope: Head-to-head study.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2641-5827
Jabed Foyez Ahmed, Korn Borvorntanajanya, Jialei Shi, Enrico Franco, Ara Darzi, Ferdinando Rodriguez Baena, Nisha Patel
{"title":"Reducing applied force in colonoscopy using a novel soft robotic colonoscope: Head-to-head study.","authors":"Jabed Foyez Ahmed, Korn Borvorntanajanya, Jialei Shi, Enrico Franco, Ara Darzi, Ferdinando Rodriguez Baena, Nisha Patel","doi":"10.1055/a-2641-5827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Current colonoscopies have a recognized limitation. Manual pushing and pulling required by operators provides gross movement in the bowel. Reported pain, therefore, is likely due to the manual force applied. Implementing novel steering techniques with a soft growing robotic system can potentially overcome challenges such as fine control, precise steering, and capability to expand treatment options for complex therapies. This study assessed a novel controlled-growing soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope in terms of force exhibited on a model bowel wall and its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A head-to-head study using a hybrid colon phantom of the left colon was undertaken. Both the novel soft-robot and standard colonoscope were passed through the phantom by endoscopists. Multiple passes were undertaken in the phantom with both colonoscopy methods with force values recorded at two points (rectum and sigmoid) with pressure sensors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine clinical endoscopists (4M:5F, 5 non-expert, 4 expert) were recruited. Average force with the novel robot was 0.25N (rectum) and 0.19N (sigmoid). Average force applied with standard colonoscopy was 2.82N (rectum) and 1.45N (sigmoid).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated an improvement in force with the novel soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope. This suggests the possibility of more comfortable colonoscopy for patients. Currently time taken is longer with the novel robot, which is attributable to the learning curve and improves in subsequent passes. Further work will be undertaken in a complete colon model with aspirations to reach in-vivo experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26415827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2641-5827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Current colonoscopies have a recognized limitation. Manual pushing and pulling required by operators provides gross movement in the bowel. Reported pain, therefore, is likely due to the manual force applied. Implementing novel steering techniques with a soft growing robotic system can potentially overcome challenges such as fine control, precise steering, and capability to expand treatment options for complex therapies. This study assessed a novel controlled-growing soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope in terms of force exhibited on a model bowel wall and its clinical implications.

Methods: A head-to-head study using a hybrid colon phantom of the left colon was undertaken. Both the novel soft-robot and standard colonoscope were passed through the phantom by endoscopists. Multiple passes were undertaken in the phantom with both colonoscopy methods with force values recorded at two points (rectum and sigmoid) with pressure sensors.

Results: Nine clinical endoscopists (4M:5F, 5 non-expert, 4 expert) were recruited. Average force with the novel robot was 0.25N (rectum) and 0.19N (sigmoid). Average force applied with standard colonoscopy was 2.82N (rectum) and 1.45N (sigmoid).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated an improvement in force with the novel soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope. This suggests the possibility of more comfortable colonoscopy for patients. Currently time taken is longer with the novel robot, which is attributable to the learning curve and improves in subsequent passes. Further work will be undertaken in a complete colon model with aspirations to reach in-vivo experiments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用新型软机器人结肠镜减少结肠镜检查的作用力:头对头的研究。
背景和研究目的:目前的结肠镜检查有公认的局限性。操作人员需要手动推动和拉动,以提供肠道的总体运动。因此,报告的疼痛可能是由于施加的手动力。采用软生长机器人系统实现新颖的转向技术,可以潜在地克服诸如精细控制、精确转向以及扩展复杂治疗选择的能力等挑战。本研究评估了一种新型控制生长软机器人与标准结肠镜在模型肠壁上显示的力及其临床意义。方法:采用左结肠混合结肠假体进行头对头研究。新型软体机器人和标准结肠镜均由内窥镜医师通过假体。采用两种结肠镜检查方法在幻影中进行多次检查,用压力传感器在两点(直肠和乙状结肠)记录力值。结果:共招募临床内镜医师9名(4M:5F,非专家5名,专家4名)。该机器人的平均受力为0.25N(直肠)和0.19N(乙状结肠)。标准结肠镜下施加的平均力为2.82N(直肠)和1.45N(乙状结肠)。结论:这项研究表明,与标准结肠镜相比,新型软机器人的力量有所改善。这表明患者有可能进行更舒适的结肠镜检查。目前使用新型机器人所花费的时间更长,这归因于学习曲线,并在随后的通过中有所改进。进一步的工作将在一个完整的结肠模型中进行,并期望达到体内实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信