Dissociating prefrontal contribution to reactive and proactive aggression: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chiara Gramegna, Barbara Barbieri, Nadia Bolognini
{"title":"Dissociating prefrontal contribution to reactive and proactive aggression: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.","authors":"Chiara Gramegna, Barbara Barbieri, Nadia Bolognini","doi":"10.1007/s00406-025-02087-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing evidence suggests that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) plays a crucial role in aggression and that it may be possible to modulate this behavior using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Nevertheless, no previous study has specifically examined the differential effects of bilateral tDCS on reactive and proactive aggression, making the present research the first to explore this distinction using neuromodulation. With this aim, we examined the effect of bi-hemispheric prefrontal tDCS in 30 healthy adults using a double-blind, sham-controlled design. All participants received three types of stimulation over the dlPFC: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal, and sham tDCS. During the stimulation, participants underwent a modified version of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, which included two different tasks: one for measuring proactive aggression (i.e., pTAP) and one for reactive aggression (i.e., rTAP). They were also given self-report questionnaires measuring individual levels of aggression, impulsivity, and empathy to test whether these constructs were associated with aggressive responses at the pTAP and rTAP. Results showed increased proactive aggression in males with both active montages, while reactive aggression increased only with right cathodal/left anodal tDCS. Females exhibited increased proactive aggression during right cathodal/left anodal tDCS, but decreased reactive aggression during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation. These findings suggest sex-dependent modulation of aggression via dlPFC stimulation. The relevance of these results extends beyond healthy individuals, as dlPFC dysfunction is a common feature in several psychiatric disorders associated with aggressive behavior. Understanding how tDCS modulates these distinct forms of aggression in healthy populations can inform future research on its therapeutic potential within clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-025-02087-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) plays a crucial role in aggression and that it may be possible to modulate this behavior using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Nevertheless, no previous study has specifically examined the differential effects of bilateral tDCS on reactive and proactive aggression, making the present research the first to explore this distinction using neuromodulation. With this aim, we examined the effect of bi-hemispheric prefrontal tDCS in 30 healthy adults using a double-blind, sham-controlled design. All participants received three types of stimulation over the dlPFC: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal, and sham tDCS. During the stimulation, participants underwent a modified version of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, which included two different tasks: one for measuring proactive aggression (i.e., pTAP) and one for reactive aggression (i.e., rTAP). They were also given self-report questionnaires measuring individual levels of aggression, impulsivity, and empathy to test whether these constructs were associated with aggressive responses at the pTAP and rTAP. Results showed increased proactive aggression in males with both active montages, while reactive aggression increased only with right cathodal/left anodal tDCS. Females exhibited increased proactive aggression during right cathodal/left anodal tDCS, but decreased reactive aggression during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation. These findings suggest sex-dependent modulation of aggression via dlPFC stimulation. The relevance of these results extends beyond healthy individuals, as dlPFC dysfunction is a common feature in several psychiatric disorders associated with aggressive behavior. Understanding how tDCS modulates these distinct forms of aggression in healthy populations can inform future research on its therapeutic potential within clinical settings.

解离前额叶对反应性和主动性攻击的贡献:经颅直流电刺激研究。
越来越多的证据表明,背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)在攻击行为中起着至关重要的作用,并且可能通过经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来调节这种行为。然而,之前没有研究专门研究双侧tDCS对反应性和主动性攻击的不同影响,这使得本研究首次使用神经调节来探索这种区别。为此,我们采用双盲、假对照设计,在30名健康成人中检测了双半球前额叶tDCS的效果。所有参与者都在dlPFC上接受了三种类型的刺激:右阴极/左阴极,右阴极/左阳极和假性tDCS。在刺激过程中,参与者接受了一个修改版的泰勒攻击范式,其中包括两个不同的任务:一个用于测量主动攻击(即pTAP),另一个用于测量反应性攻击(即rTAP)。他们还被给予自我报告问卷,测量个人的攻击性、冲动性和同理心水平,以测试这些构念是否与pTAP和rTAP的攻击性反应有关。结果表明,两种蒙太奇均增加了男性的主动攻击,而反应性攻击仅在右阴极/左阳极tDCS时增加。雌性在右阴极/左阴极刺激时表现出主动攻击增强,而在右阳极/左阴极刺激时表现出反应性攻击减弱。这些发现表明攻击行为的性别依赖性调节是通过刺激dlPFC实现的。这些结果的相关性超出了健康个体,因为dlPFC功能障碍是几种与攻击行为相关的精神疾病的共同特征。了解tDCS如何在健康人群中调节这些不同形式的攻击行为,可以为其在临床环境中的治疗潜力的未来研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信