Efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl vs midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in screening colonoscopy: Randomized controlled study.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2655-1083
Andrea C Armbrecht, Bojan Kovacevic, Maria Dyrehave Rasmussen, Michelle Katharina Bernth, Ann Merete Moeller, Peter Vilmann
{"title":"Efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl vs midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in screening colonoscopy: Randomized controlled study.","authors":"Andrea C Armbrecht, Bojan Kovacevic, Maria Dyrehave Rasmussen, Michelle Katharina Bernth, Ann Merete Moeller, Peter Vilmann","doi":"10.1055/a-2655-1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a favorable safety-profile when used for sedation in endoscopy. The aim of this project was to investigate efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl compared with midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy among fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening participants.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to intravenous remimazolam + fentanyl (RF) or midazolam + fentanyl (MF). Primary outcome was total time from start of medication until discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to reach cecum, need for post-procedure recovery, patient-reported pain and satisfaction, need for additional medication, and procedure completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients were included and randomized 1:1 (RF:103, MF:102). Mean age was 62.6 years, whereas female/male ratio was 97/108. Mean time from start of medication until discharge was 29.9 minutes (RF) versus 35.0 minutes (MF) (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.94, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Mean time to reach the cecum was 15.4 minutes (RF) compared with 20.2 minutes (MF) ( <i>P</i> = 0.001). Proportion of patients requiring postoperative observation was lower for RF 0.97% vs 9.8% for MF ( <i>P</i> = 0.022). Patients receiving remimazolam reported an average lower pain score (mean 2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) <i>P</i> = 0.012) and higher overall satisfaction score (4.65 vs 4.33, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows clear superiority of the combination of remimazolam with fentanyl over midazolam with fentanyl for conscious sedation in screening colonoscopy, obtaining shorter procedure time, less postoperative need for observation, lower patient pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26551083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a favorable safety-profile when used for sedation in endoscopy. The aim of this project was to investigate efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl compared with midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy among fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening participants.

Patients and methods: The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to intravenous remimazolam + fentanyl (RF) or midazolam + fentanyl (MF). Primary outcome was total time from start of medication until discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to reach cecum, need for post-procedure recovery, patient-reported pain and satisfaction, need for additional medication, and procedure completion.

Results: A total of 205 patients were included and randomized 1:1 (RF:103, MF:102). Mean age was 62.6 years, whereas female/male ratio was 97/108. Mean time from start of medication until discharge was 29.9 minutes (RF) versus 35.0 minutes (MF) (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.94, P = 0.012). Mean time to reach the cecum was 15.4 minutes (RF) compared with 20.2 minutes (MF) ( P = 0.001). Proportion of patients requiring postoperative observation was lower for RF 0.97% vs 9.8% for MF ( P = 0.022). Patients receiving remimazolam reported an average lower pain score (mean 2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) P = 0.012) and higher overall satisfaction score (4.65 vs 4.33, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: This study shows clear superiority of the combination of remimazolam with fentanyl over midazolam with fentanyl for conscious sedation in screening colonoscopy, obtaining shorter procedure time, less postoperative need for observation, lower patient pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雷马唑仑联合芬太尼与咪达唑仑联合芬太尼在结肠镜筛查中的镇静效果:随机对照研究。
背景与研究目的:雷马唑仑是一种新型超短效苯二氮卓类药物,在内镜下镇静时具有良好的安全性。本项目的目的是在粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)阳性筛查参与者中,比较雷马唑仑与芬太尼联合使用咪达唑仑与芬太尼在结肠镜检查中的镇静效果。患者和方法:本研究为前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。接受结肠镜检查的fit阳性参与者随机分为静脉注射雷马唑仑+芬太尼(RF)或咪达唑仑+芬太尼(MF)组。主要结局是从开始用药到出院的总时间。次要结局包括到达盲肠的时间、术后恢复的需要、患者报告的疼痛和满意度、需要额外的药物治疗和手术完成情况。结果:共纳入205例患者,按1:1随机分组(RF:103, MF:102)。平均年龄62.6岁,男女比例为97/108。从开始用药到出院的平均时间为29.9分钟(RF),而35.0分钟(MF)(95%置信区间0.77 ~ 0.94,P = 0.012)。到达盲肠的平均时间为15.4分钟(RF),而20.2分钟(MF) (P = 0.001)。RF组术后需要观察的患者比例为0.97%,MF组为9.8% (P = 0.022)。接受雷马唑仑治疗的患者报告的平均疼痛评分较低(平均2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) P = 0.012),总体满意度评分较高(4.65 vs 4.33, P = 0.012)。结论:本研究显示雷马唑仑联合芬太尼在结肠镜筛查中明显优于咪达唑仑联合芬太尼进行意识镇静,手术时间更短,术后观察需要更少,患者疼痛评分更低,患者满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信