Travis S Dowdle, Madelyn Schmidt, Frank T Winsett, Richard F Wagner
{"title":"National Trends in Repair Type Selection After Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Benchmark Analysis Using TriNetX.","authors":"Travis S Dowdle, Madelyn Schmidt, Frank T Winsett, Richard F Wagner","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following histologic tumor clearance in Mohs micrographic surgery, reconstruction plays a critical role in patient outcomes. Despite its importance, national-level data on real-world reconstructive patterns by anatomic site are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Characterize national repair patterns by anatomic site following Mohs micrographic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX research network, we extracted Mohs micrographic surgery cases performed between 2006 and 2024 (N = 607,214) and categorized repairs into reconstructive classes using CPT groupings. Cases were stratified by anatomic subunit using ICD-10 codes. Temporal trends and statistical significance were assessed using chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed the following distribution of repair types across all sites: complex repairs (34%), no same day repair (19%), local flaps (19%), intermediate repairs (18%), skin grafts (8%), interpolation flaps (0.8%), island pedicle flaps (0.1%), and simple closures (1.0%). Utilization of island pedicle flaps and complex repairs declined significantly over time (P<0.0001), coinciding with CPT coding revisions, while intermediate repair use increased. Local flaps, skin grafts, and no same day repair remained relatively stable but trended downward over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights for Mohs surgeons seeking to benchmark their own reconstructive practices as understanding one's practice patterns in relation to national norms is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Following histologic tumor clearance in Mohs micrographic surgery, reconstruction plays a critical role in patient outcomes. Despite its importance, national-level data on real-world reconstructive patterns by anatomic site are lacking.
Objective: Characterize national repair patterns by anatomic site following Mohs micrographic surgery.
Methods: Using the TriNetX research network, we extracted Mohs micrographic surgery cases performed between 2006 and 2024 (N = 607,214) and categorized repairs into reconstructive classes using CPT groupings. Cases were stratified by anatomic subunit using ICD-10 codes. Temporal trends and statistical significance were assessed using chi-squared tests.
Results: Our analysis revealed the following distribution of repair types across all sites: complex repairs (34%), no same day repair (19%), local flaps (19%), intermediate repairs (18%), skin grafts (8%), interpolation flaps (0.8%), island pedicle flaps (0.1%), and simple closures (1.0%). Utilization of island pedicle flaps and complex repairs declined significantly over time (P<0.0001), coinciding with CPT coding revisions, while intermediate repair use increased. Local flaps, skin grafts, and no same day repair remained relatively stable but trended downward over time.
Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights for Mohs surgeons seeking to benchmark their own reconstructive practices as understanding one's practice patterns in relation to national norms is critical.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.