Knowledge and Awareness of Dental Students and Practitioners About the Utilization of Endocrown.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Raneem Alfahad, Maryam Quritum, Lamia Hakami, Maha Aldandan, Osama Alharbi, Omar Almasoud, Abdullah Alasafirah, Passent Ellakany
{"title":"Knowledge and Awareness of Dental Students and Practitioners About the Utilization of Endocrown.","authors":"Raneem Alfahad, Maryam Quritum, Lamia Hakami, Maha Aldandan, Osama Alharbi, Omar Almasoud, Abdullah Alasafirah, Passent Ellakany","doi":"10.3390/dj13080348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of awareness among dental students and practitioners regarding the utilization of endocrowns in clinical settings, along with any differences in knowledge based on gender, educational level, and workplace. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional online survey-based study was conducted, including 1154 participants from various dental institutions across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire included demographic data and closed-ended questions focused on knowledge and awareness of endocrowns. Data was analyzed using statistical tests, including chi-square, to see any significant differences. <b>Results</b>: Most participants (81%) had knowledge about endocrowns, mainly from their colleagues. Knowledge levels and preferences (like the use of lithium disilicate and adhesive resin cement) differed based on gender, educational level, and workplace. Male participants and undergraduates showed better awareness in some areas. Faculty members mostly depend on college training, while private practitioners obtain most of their information from workshops. <b>Conclusions:</b> Males showed significant superiority in knowledge about endocrown usage. Colleges were the most prevalent source of information regarding endocrown restorations. Significant molar tooth loss and restricted inter-arch space were the most common reasons for utilizing endocrowns. Moreover, endocrowns were considered a viable alternative to traditional post and core.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of awareness among dental students and practitioners regarding the utilization of endocrowns in clinical settings, along with any differences in knowledge based on gender, educational level, and workplace. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey-based study was conducted, including 1154 participants from various dental institutions across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire included demographic data and closed-ended questions focused on knowledge and awareness of endocrowns. Data was analyzed using statistical tests, including chi-square, to see any significant differences. Results: Most participants (81%) had knowledge about endocrowns, mainly from their colleagues. Knowledge levels and preferences (like the use of lithium disilicate and adhesive resin cement) differed based on gender, educational level, and workplace. Male participants and undergraduates showed better awareness in some areas. Faculty members mostly depend on college training, while private practitioners obtain most of their information from workshops. Conclusions: Males showed significant superiority in knowledge about endocrown usage. Colleges were the most prevalent source of information regarding endocrown restorations. Significant molar tooth loss and restricted inter-arch space were the most common reasons for utilizing endocrowns. Moreover, endocrowns were considered a viable alternative to traditional post and core.

牙科学生和医生对牙髓利用的知识和意识。
背景/目的:本研究的目的是评估牙科学生和从业人员在临床环境中对牙髓冠使用的认知水平,以及基于性别、教育水平和工作场所的知识差异。方法:横断面在线调查为基础的研究进行,包括1154名参与者来自不同的牙科机构在沙特阿拉伯。问卷包括人口统计数据和关注牙髓冠知识和意识的封闭式问题。使用统计检验(包括卡方检验)对数据进行分析,以查看是否存在显著差异。结果:大多数参与者(81%)了解牙髓修复知识,主要来自他们的同事。知识水平和偏好(如使用二硅酸锂和胶粘剂树脂水泥)因性别、教育水平和工作场所而异。男性参与者和大学生在某些领域表现出更好的意识。教师大多依靠大学培训,而私人从业者则从研讨会上获得大部分信息。结论:男性在牙冠使用知识方面有明显优势。大学是关于牙冠内修复的最普遍的信息来源。磨牙严重脱落和牙弓间隙受限是使用内冠最常见的原因。此外,内冠被认为是传统桩核的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信