Neuroimaging Signatures of Temporomandibular Disorder and Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sarah Fischer, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Pavneet Chana, Richard G Feltbower, Vishal R Aggarwal
{"title":"Neuroimaging Signatures of Temporomandibular Disorder and Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sarah Fischer, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Pavneet Chana, Richard G Feltbower, Vishal R Aggarwal","doi":"10.3390/dj13080340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic primary orofacial pain (COFP) affects approximately 7% of the population and often leads to reduced quality of life. Patients frequently undergo multiple assessments and treatments across healthcare disciplines, often without a definitive diagnosis. The 2019 ICD-11 classification of chronic primary pain clusters together COFP subtypes based on chronicity and associated functional and emotional impairment. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate whether these subtypes of COFP share common underlying mechanisms by comparing neuroimaging findings. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed using Medline (OVID) and Scopus up to April 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on MRI-based neuroimaging studies of participants diagnosed with COFP subtypes. Data extraction included participant demographics, imaging modality, brain regions affected, and pain assessment tools. Quality assessment used a modified Coleman methodological score. <b>Results:</b> Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all utilising MRI and including two COFP subtypes (temporomandibular disorder and burning mouth syndrome). Resting- and task-state imaging revealed overlapping alterations in several brain regions, including the thalamus, somatosensory cortices (S1, S2), cingulate cortex, insula, prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, medial temporal lobe, and primary motor area. These changes were consistent across both TMD and BMS populations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that chronic primary orofacial pain conditions (TMD and BMS) may share common central neuroplastic changes, supporting the hypothesis of a unified pathophysiological mechanism. This has implications for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies, potentially leading to more targeted and effective care for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic primary orofacial pain (COFP) affects approximately 7% of the population and often leads to reduced quality of life. Patients frequently undergo multiple assessments and treatments across healthcare disciplines, often without a definitive diagnosis. The 2019 ICD-11 classification of chronic primary pain clusters together COFP subtypes based on chronicity and associated functional and emotional impairment. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether these subtypes of COFP share common underlying mechanisms by comparing neuroimaging findings. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed using Medline (OVID) and Scopus up to April 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on MRI-based neuroimaging studies of participants diagnosed with COFP subtypes. Data extraction included participant demographics, imaging modality, brain regions affected, and pain assessment tools. Quality assessment used a modified Coleman methodological score. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all utilising MRI and including two COFP subtypes (temporomandibular disorder and burning mouth syndrome). Resting- and task-state imaging revealed overlapping alterations in several brain regions, including the thalamus, somatosensory cortices (S1, S2), cingulate cortex, insula, prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, medial temporal lobe, and primary motor area. These changes were consistent across both TMD and BMS populations. Conclusions: The findings suggest that chronic primary orofacial pain conditions (TMD and BMS) may share common central neuroplastic changes, supporting the hypothesis of a unified pathophysiological mechanism. This has implications for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies, potentially leading to more targeted and effective care for these patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颞下颌紊乱和灼口综合征的神经影像学特征:系统综述。
背景:慢性原发性口面部疼痛(COFP)影响约7%的人口,通常导致生活质量下降。患者经常接受跨医疗保健学科的多次评估和治疗,通常没有明确的诊断。2019年ICD-11慢性原发性疼痛簇和COFP亚型的分类基于慢性和相关的功能和情绪损害。目的:本研究旨在通过比较神经影像学表现来评估这些亚型COFP是否具有共同的潜在机制。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。使用Medline (OVID)和Scopus进行检索,截止到2025年4月。纳入标准侧重于诊断为COFP亚型的参与者的基于mri的神经影像学研究。数据提取包括参与者的人口统计、成像方式、受影响的大脑区域和疼痛评估工具。质量评估采用改良的Coleman方法评分。结果:14项研究符合纳入标准,均采用MRI,包括两种COFP亚型(颞下颌紊乱和灼口综合征)。静息和任务状态成像显示了几个大脑区域的重叠改变,包括丘脑、体感觉皮层(S1, S2)、扣带皮层、脑岛、前额叶皮层、基底神经节、内侧颞叶和初级运动区。这些变化在TMD和BMS人群中是一致的。结论:研究结果提示慢性原发性口面部疼痛(TMD和BMS)可能具有共同的中枢神经可塑性改变,支持统一的病理生理机制假说。这对改善诊断和治疗策略具有重要意义,可能导致对这些患者进行更有针对性和更有效的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信