Effect of Thermal Ageing on Flexural Strength and Microhardness of Novel High-Performance Polymer (Nanoksa G-Plus) in Comparison to a Widely Used Bio-HPP/PEEK.
Ramy Abdallah Abdelrahim, Ahmed Ali Ezzeldine, Mahmoud Abdellah, SaadEldein Sadeq Elghazawi
{"title":"Effect of Thermal Ageing on Flexural Strength and Microhardness of Novel High-Performance Polymer (Nanoksa G-Plus) in Comparison to a Widely Used Bio-HPP/PEEK.","authors":"Ramy Abdallah Abdelrahim, Ahmed Ali Ezzeldine, Mahmoud Abdellah, SaadEldein Sadeq Elghazawi","doi":"10.3390/dj13080370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The dental industry is continuously developing high-performance polymer (HPP) materials with different qualities for denture frameworks. The aim of this in vitro study was to assess how thermal ageing (TA) affects the flexural strength (FS) and microhardness of two different HPP materials: Nanoksa G-plus and Bio-HPP/PEEK. <b>Methods:</b> The TA process was carried out for 5000 cycles at 5 °C and 55 °C in distilled water. To assess FS, a total of 40 bar-shaped specimens measuring 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 2.5 mm (20 per group) were obtained; TA and No-TA (NTA) subgroups were prepared for each material group (10 per subgroup); and a three-point bending test was conducted using an Instron universal testing machine. Each specimen that fractured during the FS test was subjected to microhardness measurement using a Vickers hardness tester. The mean FS and microhardness of the TA and NTA specimens were statistically examined using the <i>t</i>-test. <b>Results:</b> Both the TA and NTA Bio-HPP/PEEK specimens exhibited significantly greater (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) microhardness and FS qualities than the Nanoksa G-Plus specimens. The FS and microhardness of the Bio-HPP/PEEK and Nanoksa G-Plus materials significantly decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) after TA. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Bio-HPP/PEEK material showed better FS and microhardness properties than the Nanoksa G-Plus material. TA considerably decreased the FS and microhardness of the Bio-HPP/PEEK and Nanoksa G-Plus materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The dental industry is continuously developing high-performance polymer (HPP) materials with different qualities for denture frameworks. The aim of this in vitro study was to assess how thermal ageing (TA) affects the flexural strength (FS) and microhardness of two different HPP materials: Nanoksa G-plus and Bio-HPP/PEEK. Methods: The TA process was carried out for 5000 cycles at 5 °C and 55 °C in distilled water. To assess FS, a total of 40 bar-shaped specimens measuring 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 2.5 mm (20 per group) were obtained; TA and No-TA (NTA) subgroups were prepared for each material group (10 per subgroup); and a three-point bending test was conducted using an Instron universal testing machine. Each specimen that fractured during the FS test was subjected to microhardness measurement using a Vickers hardness tester. The mean FS and microhardness of the TA and NTA specimens were statistically examined using the t-test. Results: Both the TA and NTA Bio-HPP/PEEK specimens exhibited significantly greater (p < 0.0001) microhardness and FS qualities than the Nanoksa G-Plus specimens. The FS and microhardness of the Bio-HPP/PEEK and Nanoksa G-Plus materials significantly decreased (p < 0.05) after TA. Conclusions: The Bio-HPP/PEEK material showed better FS and microhardness properties than the Nanoksa G-Plus material. TA considerably decreased the FS and microhardness of the Bio-HPP/PEEK and Nanoksa G-Plus materials.