Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil CD64 Index in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Haojie Sun, Hao Heng, Xuekui Liu, Houfa Geng, Jun Liang
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil CD64 Index in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.","authors":"Haojie Sun, Hao Heng, Xuekui Liu, Houfa Geng, Jun Liang","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S525260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the value of the Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index as a novel, rapid biomarker for the diagnosis of Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), with the goal of enhancing the accuracy of early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 142 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by diabetic foot infection were included. Participants were categorized into a Non-DFO group (84 cases) and a DFO group (58 cases) based on the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. The white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the nCD64 index were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the nCD64 index in diagnosing DFO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nCD64 index was significantly elevated in the DFO group compared to the Non-DFO group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the nCD64 index and ESR were independent risk factors for DFO (P < 0.05). The ROC-AUC analysis indicated that both the nCD64 index and ESR were associated with DFO. The nCD64 index exhibited superior predictive value compared to ESR (AUC: 0.895 vs 0.846). Specifically, the nCD64 index demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 96.6%, while ESR showed the highest specificity at 82.1%. When combined, the predictive value of the nCD64 index and ESR was optimal, with an AUC of 0.937, sensitivity of 86.2%, and specificity of 91.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nCD64 index may serve as an effective new biomarker for the early detection of DFO. The combination of the nCD64 index and ESR could further enhance diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2985-2994"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S525260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the value of the Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index as a novel, rapid biomarker for the diagnosis of Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), with the goal of enhancing the accuracy of early detection.

Methods: A total of 142 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by diabetic foot infection were included. Participants were categorized into a Non-DFO group (84 cases) and a DFO group (58 cases) based on the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. The white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the nCD64 index were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the nCD64 index in diagnosing DFO.

Results: The nCD64 index was significantly elevated in the DFO group compared to the Non-DFO group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the nCD64 index and ESR were independent risk factors for DFO (P < 0.05). The ROC-AUC analysis indicated that both the nCD64 index and ESR were associated with DFO. The nCD64 index exhibited superior predictive value compared to ESR (AUC: 0.895 vs 0.846). Specifically, the nCD64 index demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 96.6%, while ESR showed the highest specificity at 82.1%. When combined, the predictive value of the nCD64 index and ESR was optimal, with an AUC of 0.937, sensitivity of 86.2%, and specificity of 91.7%.

Conclusion: The nCD64 index may serve as an effective new biomarker for the early detection of DFO. The combination of the nCD64 index and ESR could further enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中性粒细胞CD64指数对糖尿病足骨髓炎的诊断价值。
目的:本研究旨在评估中性粒细胞CD64 (Neutrophil CD64, nCD64)指数作为诊断糖尿病足骨髓炎(Diabetic foot osteomyelitis, DFO)的一种新的、快速的生物标志物的价值,以提高早期发现的准确性。方法:选取142例住院2型糖尿病合并糖尿病足部感染患者。根据是否存在骨髓炎,参与者被分为非DFO组(84例)和DFO组(58例)。比较两组患者白细胞计数(WBC)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、nCD64指数。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与DFO相关的危险因素。生成受试者工作特征(Receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC),评价nCD64指数诊断DFO的敏感性和特异性。结果:与非DFO组相比,DFO组的nCD64指数显著升高(p)结论:nCD64指数可作为早期检测DFO的有效的新的生物标志物。nCD64指数与ESR结合可进一步提高诊断准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
431
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信