National Eye Institute Supported Randomized Controlled Trials in Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disorders: Lessons Learned.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cornea Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003967
Ahmed F Omar, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Beth Ann Benetz, Jonathan Carcione, Jonathan H Lass
{"title":"National Eye Institute Supported Randomized Controlled Trials in Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disorders: Lessons Learned.","authors":"Ahmed F Omar, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Beth Ann Benetz, Jonathan Carcione, Jonathan H Lass","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>National Eye Institute (NEI)-funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have significantly shaped the modern landscape of keratoplasty for endothelial disorders. Unlike retrospective studies, RCTs have offered the highest level of clinical evidence and have addressed critical questions related to histocompatibility matching, donor and donor tissue characteristics, donor tissue storage, and operative and postoperative factors supporting postoperative endothelial cell health. These RCTs have in turn directly influenced eye banking and keratoplasty practices. The purpose of this review is to 1) summarize the major findings from all of the NEI-sponsored keratoplasty RCTs, including the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies, the Cornea Donor Study and its ancillary study, the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, the Cornea Preservation Time Study, as well as the on-going Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study and the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial; 2) review select keratoplasty RCTs not supported by the NEI; 3) compare findings from these RCTs with those from the major keratoplasty registries; and 4) discuss promising future directions in keratoplasty and eye banking that would lend themselves for RCTs. Collectively, these RCTs have clarified long-standing controversies, validated emerging practices, and will continue to provide the foundation for future innovation in the surgical management of endothelial diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":"1323-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: National Eye Institute (NEI)-funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have significantly shaped the modern landscape of keratoplasty for endothelial disorders. Unlike retrospective studies, RCTs have offered the highest level of clinical evidence and have addressed critical questions related to histocompatibility matching, donor and donor tissue characteristics, donor tissue storage, and operative and postoperative factors supporting postoperative endothelial cell health. These RCTs have in turn directly influenced eye banking and keratoplasty practices. The purpose of this review is to 1) summarize the major findings from all of the NEI-sponsored keratoplasty RCTs, including the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies, the Cornea Donor Study and its ancillary study, the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, the Cornea Preservation Time Study, as well as the on-going Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study and the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial; 2) review select keratoplasty RCTs not supported by the NEI; 3) compare findings from these RCTs with those from the major keratoplasty registries; and 4) discuss promising future directions in keratoplasty and eye banking that would lend themselves for RCTs. Collectively, these RCTs have clarified long-standing controversies, validated emerging practices, and will continue to provide the foundation for future innovation in the surgical management of endothelial diseases.

Abstract Image

国家眼科研究所支持角膜移植治疗内皮疾病的随机对照试验:经验教训。
摘要:美国国家眼科研究所(NEI)资助的随机对照试验(rct)显著地塑造了内皮疾病角膜移植术的现代景观。与回顾性研究不同,随机对照试验提供了最高水平的临床证据,并解决了与组织相容性匹配、供体和供体组织特征、供体组织储存以及支持术后内皮细胞健康的手术和术后因素相关的关键问题。这些随机对照试验反过来直接影响了眼库和角膜移植术的实践。本综述的目的是:1)总结所有nei赞助的角膜移植术随机对照试验的主要发现,包括角膜移植合作研究、角膜供体研究及其辅助研究、镜面显微镜辅助研究、角膜保存时间研究以及正在进行的糖尿病内皮角膜移植术研究和内皮厚度比较试验;2)回顾未被NEI支持的角膜移植随机对照试验;3)将这些随机对照试验的结果与主要角膜移植登记的结果进行比较;4)讨论角膜移植术和眼库的未来发展方向,为随机对照试验提供帮助。总的来说,这些随机对照试验澄清了长期存在的争议,验证了新兴的实践,并将继续为内皮疾病手术治疗的未来创新提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信