Effect of different light-curing modes and curing times on degree of conversion and microhardness of three different bulk-fill composites: an in vitro study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Faiza Javed, Rajendra Kumar Tewari, Sharique Alam, Shahid Husain, Faisal Hasan
{"title":"Effect of different light-curing modes and curing times on degree of conversion and microhardness of three different bulk-fill composites: an in vitro study.","authors":"Faiza Javed, Rajendra Kumar Tewari, Sharique Alam, Shahid Husain, Faisal Hasan","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06510-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in vitro study aims to compare the effect of different light curing modes and curing times on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness (MH) of three different bulk fill composites at two different depths.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 224 cylindrical specimens (4 mm height, 6 mm diameter) were prepared using four composites: SDR Plus, Ever X Posterior (EXP), Beautifil Bulk Restorative (BBR), and Tetric N Ceram (TNC). Each material group (n = 56) was subdivided into four curing subgroups based on light-curing mode (Low Power or High Power) and exposure time (20-30 s). Following curing, all samples were stored at 37 °C for 24 h. From each subgroup, seven specimens were allocated for DC testing using Raman spectroscopy and seven for MH testing using the Vickers microhardness test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the materials achieved acceptable (> 80%) bottom-to-top Vickers hardness ratio in high power (HP) mode for both curing times. However, in the low power (LP) mode, EXP could not achieve this ratio at 20 s and BBR failed to achieve this ratio in both curing times. BBR could not achieve an acceptable DC (> 55%) in both curing modes and both curing times. EXP did not demonstrate acceptable DC in LP mode at 20 s curing time, while SDR showed acceptable DC in both curing modes and both curing times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compliance with manufacturers' instructions yielded acceptable outcomes in most cases. Each bulk fill material has different requirements pertaining to curing intensity and time to achieve desirable microhardness and degree of conversion. Clinicians should be aware of the curing protocol for the specific bulk fill materials.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>BBR consistently exhibited low degrees of conversion, even when the applied energy density exceeded the manufacturer's recommended levels. Further research is warranted to establish optimized curing protocols for giomer-based composites and to investigate the long-term impact of the degree of conversion on the mechanical properties and clinical durability of these restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06510-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This in vitro study aims to compare the effect of different light curing modes and curing times on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness (MH) of three different bulk fill composites at two different depths.

Materials and methods: A total of 224 cylindrical specimens (4 mm height, 6 mm diameter) were prepared using four composites: SDR Plus, Ever X Posterior (EXP), Beautifil Bulk Restorative (BBR), and Tetric N Ceram (TNC). Each material group (n = 56) was subdivided into four curing subgroups based on light-curing mode (Low Power or High Power) and exposure time (20-30 s). Following curing, all samples were stored at 37 °C for 24 h. From each subgroup, seven specimens were allocated for DC testing using Raman spectroscopy and seven for MH testing using the Vickers microhardness test.

Results: All the materials achieved acceptable (> 80%) bottom-to-top Vickers hardness ratio in high power (HP) mode for both curing times. However, in the low power (LP) mode, EXP could not achieve this ratio at 20 s and BBR failed to achieve this ratio in both curing times. BBR could not achieve an acceptable DC (> 55%) in both curing modes and both curing times. EXP did not demonstrate acceptable DC in LP mode at 20 s curing time, while SDR showed acceptable DC in both curing modes and both curing times.

Conclusion: Compliance with manufacturers' instructions yielded acceptable outcomes in most cases. Each bulk fill material has different requirements pertaining to curing intensity and time to achieve desirable microhardness and degree of conversion. Clinicians should be aware of the curing protocol for the specific bulk fill materials.

Clinical relevance: BBR consistently exhibited low degrees of conversion, even when the applied energy density exceeded the manufacturer's recommended levels. Further research is warranted to establish optimized curing protocols for giomer-based composites and to investigate the long-term impact of the degree of conversion on the mechanical properties and clinical durability of these restorations.

不同光固化方式和固化时间对三种不同块体填充复合材料转化度和显微硬度的影响
目的:比较不同光固化方式和固化时间对三种不同体积填充复合材料在两种不同深度下的转化度(DC)和显微硬度(MH)的影响。材料与方法:采用SDR Plus、Ever X Posterior (EXP)、Beautifil Bulk Restorative (BBR)和Tetric N Ceram (TNC)四种复合材料,共制备224个圆柱形标本(高4mm,直径6mm)。每个材料组(n = 56)根据光固化方式(低功率或高功率)和曝光时间(20-30 s)细分为4个固化亚组。固化后,所有样品在37℃下保存24小时。从每个亚组中,分配7个样品进行拉曼光谱直流测试,7个样品进行维氏显微硬度测试的MH测试。结果:在高功率(HP)模式下,所有材料在两种固化时间下均达到可接受的自下而上维氏硬度比(bbb80 %)。然而,在低功率(LP)模式下,EXP在20 s时无法达到该比例,BBR在两个固化时间下都无法达到该比例。在两种固化方式和两种固化时间下,BBR都不能达到可接受的DC(> 55%)。在20 s的固化时间下,EXP在LP模式下没有表现出可接受的直流,而SDR在两种固化模式和两种固化时间下都表现出可接受的直流。结论:在大多数情况下,遵守制造商的说明书产生了可接受的结果。为了达到理想的显微硬度和转化程度,每种散装填充材料对固化强度和时间有不同的要求。临床医生应该了解具体散装填充材料的固化方案。临床相关性:即使施加的能量密度超过制造商的推荐水平,BBR也始终表现出低程度的转化。进一步的研究需要建立优化的聚物基复合材料的固化方案,并研究转化程度对这些修复体的力学性能和临床耐久性的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信