A comparison between venous blood sampling and capillary volumetric absorptive microsampling for antibiotics levels monitoring in individuals with and without periodontal disease.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ioanna Lazaridi, Eva Choong, Thomas Mercier, Laurent A Decosterd, Catherine Giannopoulou, Alkisti Zekeridou
{"title":"A comparison between venous blood sampling and capillary volumetric absorptive microsampling for antibiotics levels monitoring in individuals with and without periodontal disease.","authors":"Ioanna Lazaridi, Eva Choong, Thomas Mercier, Laurent A Decosterd, Catherine Giannopoulou, Alkisti Zekeridou","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06466-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the antibiotic concentrations obtained using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices with those determined in plasma from conventional venous blood collected within the frame of a pharmacokinetic study of amoxicillin (AMO), metronidazole (MET), azithromycin (AZI), commonly used for periodontal treatment. The suitability and overall, acceptability of the VAMS approach was also ascertained by both participants of the pilot study and dentist practitioners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve volunteers (6 subjects without periodontal problems (PH), and 6 individuals affected with periodontitis (PP)) were administered 500 mg each of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and azithromycin. Paired venous blood (VB) and capillary VAMS samples were collected at 2-, 6-,10-, 24-, 48- and 96-hours post-antibiotics administration. Antibiotic concentrations were determined using multiplex liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in antibiotic concentrations were observed between VAMS and venous blood (VB) collection methods, across different time points for the three antibiotics (p < 0.05). AMO concentrations in VB were 3.5-fold higher (p < 0.01) than in VAMS at early time points (2, 6, 10 h (h)). MET levels in VB were 1.5-fold higher than in VAMS at 2 h and 6 h, (p < 0.01), but this difference disappeared after 10 h. Alternately, while AZI levels were similar in VB and VAMs 2 h after administration, AZI concentrations in VB and VAMS declined non parallelly, with VB levels decreasing to about 60 to 25% of those measured in VAMS over the observed 96 h interval. Antibiotic exposures were not different in the PH and PP groups. Differences in antibiotics concentrations determined in VB and VAMS samples are a direct consequence of (i) the matrices used for analyses (plasma in VB, vs. whole blood with VAMS), (ii) the subjects' hematocrit, and (iii) the distinct cell distribution pattern of antibiotics with AMO characterized by a weak penetration in red blood cells (RBC) while AZI tends to progressively concentrate into RBC. MET was present at higher concentrations in plasma until 6 h which thereafter tended to re-equilibrate equally in plasma and RBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though VAMS yielded significantly different results compared to plasma, it effectively reflects the concentration evolution of the antibiotics and could be an alternative in pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic monitoring.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>VAMS holds promise in advancing therapeutic drug monitoring in periodontal research and clinical practice. Being less invasive than venous puncture it is well accepted by subjects and facilitate blood monitoring in clinical trials and non-hospital settings. Its minimal invasiveness and simplified logistics make it suitable for enhancing precision medicine and pharmaceutical approaches in periodontology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06466-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to compare the antibiotic concentrations obtained using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices with those determined in plasma from conventional venous blood collected within the frame of a pharmacokinetic study of amoxicillin (AMO), metronidazole (MET), azithromycin (AZI), commonly used for periodontal treatment. The suitability and overall, acceptability of the VAMS approach was also ascertained by both participants of the pilot study and dentist practitioners.

Materials and methods: Twelve volunteers (6 subjects without periodontal problems (PH), and 6 individuals affected with periodontitis (PP)) were administered 500 mg each of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and azithromycin. Paired venous blood (VB) and capillary VAMS samples were collected at 2-, 6-,10-, 24-, 48- and 96-hours post-antibiotics administration. Antibiotic concentrations were determined using multiplex liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and t-tests.

Results: Significant differences in antibiotic concentrations were observed between VAMS and venous blood (VB) collection methods, across different time points for the three antibiotics (p < 0.05). AMO concentrations in VB were 3.5-fold higher (p < 0.01) than in VAMS at early time points (2, 6, 10 h (h)). MET levels in VB were 1.5-fold higher than in VAMS at 2 h and 6 h, (p < 0.01), but this difference disappeared after 10 h. Alternately, while AZI levels were similar in VB and VAMs 2 h after administration, AZI concentrations in VB and VAMS declined non parallelly, with VB levels decreasing to about 60 to 25% of those measured in VAMS over the observed 96 h interval. Antibiotic exposures were not different in the PH and PP groups. Differences in antibiotics concentrations determined in VB and VAMS samples are a direct consequence of (i) the matrices used for analyses (plasma in VB, vs. whole blood with VAMS), (ii) the subjects' hematocrit, and (iii) the distinct cell distribution pattern of antibiotics with AMO characterized by a weak penetration in red blood cells (RBC) while AZI tends to progressively concentrate into RBC. MET was present at higher concentrations in plasma until 6 h which thereafter tended to re-equilibrate equally in plasma and RBC.

Conclusion: Though VAMS yielded significantly different results compared to plasma, it effectively reflects the concentration evolution of the antibiotics and could be an alternative in pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic monitoring.

Clinical relevance: VAMS holds promise in advancing therapeutic drug monitoring in periodontal research and clinical practice. Being less invasive than venous puncture it is well accepted by subjects and facilitate blood monitoring in clinical trials and non-hospital settings. Its minimal invasiveness and simplified logistics make it suitable for enhancing precision medicine and pharmaceutical approaches in periodontology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

静脉血采样和毛细管容量吸收微采样在有和无牙周病个体抗生素水平监测中的比较
目的:我们旨在比较使用体积吸收微采样(VAMS)装置获得的抗生素浓度与在阿莫西林(AMO)、甲硝唑(MET)、阿奇霉素(AZI)的药代动力学研究框架内收集的传统静脉血血浆中测定的抗生素浓度,这些药物通常用于牙周治疗。试点研究的参与者和牙医从业人员也确定了VAMS方法的适用性和总体可接受性。材料与方法:12名志愿者(6名无牙周问题(PH)的受试者和6名患有牙周炎(PP)的受试者)分别给予阿莫西林、甲硝唑和阿奇霉素各500 mg。分别于给药后2、6、10、24、48和96小时采集配对静脉血(VB)和毛细血管VAMS样本。采用多重液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定抗生素浓度。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U检验和t检验。结果:三种抗生素在不同时间点,VAMS和静脉血(VB)采集方法之间的抗生素浓度存在显著差异(p)结论:VAMS虽然与血浆采集结果存在显著差异,但它有效地反映了抗生素的浓度演变,可作为药代动力学研究和治疗监测的替代方法。临床相关性:VAMS有望在牙周研究和临床实践中推进治疗药物监测。它比静脉穿刺侵入性小,被受试者广泛接受,便于临床试验和非医院环境中的血液监测。其最小的侵入性和简化的物流使其适合于加强牙周病的精确医学和药物方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信