{"title":"Validation of the Patient-Rated Version of the Parkinson Anxiety Scale in Iranian People with Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Maryam Mehdizadeh, Negin Eissazade, Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad, Mohsen Shati, Seyede Salehe Mortazavi, Sayed Amir Hasan Habibi, Masoumeh Bayat, Farzaneh Fendereski, Reihaneh Akbari, Parvaneh Taghavi Azar Sharabiani, Ghorban Taghizadeh","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2555573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Rated Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS-PR) in people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we assessed Persian-speaking PwPD using the PAS-PR. Psychometric evaluation included: exploratory factor analysis (EFA); internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test - retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient); PAS-PR/observer-rated PAS (PAS-OR) agreement (Bland-Altman); and convergent validity against Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 191 PwPD (58% male, mean age 69.2 ± 4.6 years; Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-4: 36.7%, 42.4%, 18.3%, and 2.6%, respectively), EFA revealed the expected three-factor structure. The PAS-PR demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.88; ICC = 0.96) and strong agreement with PAS-OR (96.19%). Convergent validity was established through significant correlations with GAI, HADS-A, BAI and DASS-21 (<i>r</i> = 0.61-0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PAS-PR, with its acceptable psychometric properties, proves to be a valuable tool for assessing anxiety in the Persian-speaking PwPD.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The PAS-PR offers a practical, tailored tool for identifying diverse anxiety symptoms in Parkinson's patients, streamlining screening in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2555573","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Rated Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS-PR) in people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD).
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed Persian-speaking PwPD using the PAS-PR. Psychometric evaluation included: exploratory factor analysis (EFA); internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test - retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient); PAS-PR/observer-rated PAS (PAS-OR) agreement (Bland-Altman); and convergent validity against Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21).
Results: Among 191 PwPD (58% male, mean age 69.2 ± 4.6 years; Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-4: 36.7%, 42.4%, 18.3%, and 2.6%, respectively), EFA revealed the expected three-factor structure. The PAS-PR demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.88; ICC = 0.96) and strong agreement with PAS-OR (96.19%). Convergent validity was established through significant correlations with GAI, HADS-A, BAI and DASS-21 (r = 0.61-0.75).
Conclusions: The PAS-PR, with its acceptable psychometric properties, proves to be a valuable tool for assessing anxiety in the Persian-speaking PwPD.
Clinical implications: The PAS-PR offers a practical, tailored tool for identifying diverse anxiety symptoms in Parkinson's patients, streamlining screening in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including:
-adjustments to changing roles-
issues related to diversity and aging-
family caregiving-
spirituality-
cognitive and psychosocial assessment-
depression, anxiety, and PTSD-
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders-
long term care-
behavioral medicine in aging-
rehabilitation and education for older adults.
Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.