Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy and lithotripsy for managing acute calculous cholecystitis in non-surgical candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.5946/ce.2024.256
Arsalan Nadeem, Ali Husnain, Aleena Ahmed, Haider Ashfaq, Hamza Ashraf, Zain Ali Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Shahroze Ahmad, Muhammad Rafay Shahzad Cheema
{"title":"Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy and lithotripsy for managing acute calculous cholecystitis in non-surgical candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Arsalan Nadeem, Ali Husnain, Aleena Ahmed, Haider Ashfaq, Hamza Ashraf, Zain Ali Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Shahroze Ahmad, Muhammad Rafay Shahzad Cheema","doi":"10.5946/ce.2024.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to review and update the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of percutaneous cholecystolithotomy/lithotripsy (PCCL) for managing acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in non-surgical candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase was conducted. We included studies focusing on the use of PCCL in patients deemed ineligible for surgery owing to ACC and reporting outcomes such as technical success, stone clearance, recurrence, and length of hospital stay. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of 13 studies showed a technical success rate of 97%, with stone and cholecystitis recurrence in 10% and 1% of cases, respectively. The pooled average length of hospital stay was 2.79 days. Complications included retained stones (3%), duct perforations (6%), catheter displacement (5%), bleeding (4%), and bile leakage (5%). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCCL demonstrated high efficacy with minimal recurrence and low complication rates in managing ACC in non-surgical candidates. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to compare its efficacy and safety with standard care approaches, such as cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"684-695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to review and update the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of percutaneous cholecystolithotomy/lithotripsy (PCCL) for managing acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in non-surgical candidates.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase was conducted. We included studies focusing on the use of PCCL in patients deemed ineligible for surgery owing to ACC and reporting outcomes such as technical success, stone clearance, recurrence, and length of hospital stay. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: Meta-analysis of 13 studies showed a technical success rate of 97%, with stone and cholecystitis recurrence in 10% and 1% of cases, respectively. The pooled average length of hospital stay was 2.79 days. Complications included retained stones (3%), duct perforations (6%), catheter displacement (5%), bleeding (4%), and bile leakage (5%). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.

Conclusions: PCCL demonstrated high efficacy with minimal recurrence and low complication rates in managing ACC in non-surgical candidates. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to compare its efficacy and safety with standard care approaches, such as cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮胆囊取石和碎石术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎非手术候选人:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景/目的:本研究旨在回顾和更新有关经皮胆囊取石术/碎石术(PCCL)治疗急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的有效性和安全性的证据。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)和Embase。我们纳入了关注因ACC而被认为不适合手术的患者使用PCCL的研究,并报告了技术成功、结石清除、复发和住院时间等结果。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。结果:13项研究的荟萃分析显示,技术成功率为97%,结石和胆囊炎的复发率分别为10%和1%。合计平均住院时间为2.79天。并发症包括结石残留(3%)、导管穿孔(6%)、导管移位(5%)、出血(4%)和胆漏(5%)。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。结论:PCCL在非手术治疗ACC患者中具有良好的疗效,复发率低,并发症发生率低。需要进一步的随机对照试验来比较其与标准治疗方法(如胆囊切除术或经皮胆囊造口术)的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信