Differential Item Functioning of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Decompensated Cirrhosis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nneka N Ufere, Chengbo Zeng, Daniel Shalev, Andrea L Pusic, Kurt Kroenke, Maria Edelen
{"title":"Differential Item Functioning of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Decompensated Cirrhosis.","authors":"Nneka N Ufere, Chengbo Zeng, Daniel Shalev, Andrea L Pusic, Kurt Kroenke, Maria Edelen","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examined whether the symptom expression of depression as assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening tool differs between patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) compared to primary care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study included 218 DC patients (91% Child-Pugh Class B/C) recruited from a liver transplant center and a real-world cohort of 436 outpatients from four primary care clinics in a large tertiary academic health system who completed the PHQ-9. We calculated positive screening rates for depression (PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10) for both cohorts. We evaluated PHQ-9 items for differential item functioning (DIF) in both cohorts within an Item Response Theory (IRT) framework. We compared DIF-adjusted and unadjusted IRT scores to characterize the impact of DIF on PHQ-9 total scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive screening rates using a PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10 were 39% and 30% for DC and primary care patients respectively. Three PHQ-9 somatic symptom items (sleep problems, low energy, psychomotor agitation or retardation) showed significant DIF, with DC more likely than primary care patients with similar levels of depression severity to endorse these symptoms. DIF-adjusted scores suggested a one-point increase (PHQ-9 cutoff score of 11) in the screening threshold for DC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equating for depression severity, we found differences in the symptom expression of depression for DC patients relative to primary care patients. Our findings highlight the need for future clinical and basic research into the diagnostic performance of depression screening tests and the phenomenology of depression in patients with DC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We examined whether the symptom expression of depression as assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening tool differs between patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) compared to primary care patients.

Methods: Study included 218 DC patients (91% Child-Pugh Class B/C) recruited from a liver transplant center and a real-world cohort of 436 outpatients from four primary care clinics in a large tertiary academic health system who completed the PHQ-9. We calculated positive screening rates for depression (PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10) for both cohorts. We evaluated PHQ-9 items for differential item functioning (DIF) in both cohorts within an Item Response Theory (IRT) framework. We compared DIF-adjusted and unadjusted IRT scores to characterize the impact of DIF on PHQ-9 total scores.

Results: Positive screening rates using a PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10 were 39% and 30% for DC and primary care patients respectively. Three PHQ-9 somatic symptom items (sleep problems, low energy, psychomotor agitation or retardation) showed significant DIF, with DC more likely than primary care patients with similar levels of depression severity to endorse these symptoms. DIF-adjusted scores suggested a one-point increase (PHQ-9 cutoff score of 11) in the screening threshold for DC patients.

Conclusions: Equating for depression severity, we found differences in the symptom expression of depression for DC patients relative to primary care patients. Our findings highlight the need for future clinical and basic research into the diagnostic performance of depression screening tests and the phenomenology of depression in patients with DC.

失代偿期肝硬化患者健康问卷-9的差异项目功能。
前言:我们研究了使用患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)抑郁筛查工具评估的抑郁症症状表达在失代偿性肝硬化(DC)患者与初级保健患者之间是否存在差异。方法:研究包括从肝移植中心招募的218名DC患者(91%为Child-Pugh B/C级)和来自大型三级学术卫生系统的四个初级保健诊所的436名门诊患者,这些患者完成了PHQ-9。我们计算了两个队列的抑郁症阳性筛查率(PHQ-9临界值为10)。我们在项目反应理论(IRT)框架内评估了PHQ-9项目在两个队列中的差异项目功能(DIF)。我们比较了DIF调整和未调整的IRT评分,以表征DIF对PHQ-9总分的影响。结果:使用PHQ-9临界值为10的筛查阳性率在DC和初级保健患者中分别为39%和30%。三个PHQ-9躯体症状项目(睡眠问题、低能量、精神运动躁动或发育迟缓)显示出显著的DIF, DC比抑郁严重程度相似的初级保健患者更有可能支持这些症状。dif调整后的评分显示,DC患者的筛查阈值增加了1分(PHQ-9截止评分为11分)。结论:与抑郁严重程度等同,我们发现DC患者的抑郁症状表达与初级保健患者存在差异。我们的研究结果强调了对抑郁症筛查测试的诊断性能和抑郁症在DC患者中的现象进行进一步的临床和基础研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信