Clinical, dermoscopic and confocal microscopy features of multiple primary melanomas according to germline variant status: a retrospective, hospital-based study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Marco Spadafora, Beatrice Melli, Jonida Bardhushi, Stefania Borsari, Simonetta Rosato, Stefano Giuseppe Caraffi, Chiara Cattani, Vincenza Ylenia Cusenza, Davide Nicoli, Shaniko Kaleci, Iris Zalaudek, Caterina Longo
{"title":"Clinical, dermoscopic and confocal microscopy features of multiple primary melanomas according to germline variant status: a retrospective, hospital-based study.","authors":"Marco Spadafora, Beatrice Melli, Jonida Bardhushi, Stefania Borsari, Simonetta Rosato, Stefano Giuseppe Caraffi, Chiara Cattani, Vincenza Ylenia Cusenza, Davide Nicoli, Shaniko Kaleci, Iris Zalaudek, Caterina Longo","doi":"10.1093/ced/llaf354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Familial melanoma represents approximately 10% of cutaneous melanomas. Individuals with pathogenic germline variants have a higher risk of developing multiple primary melanomas (MPM). However, differences in clinical, dermoscopic, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features between variant carriers and non-carriers are not well established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical, dermoscopic, and RCM characteristics of MPM patients with and without germline variants associated with familial melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 MPM patients who underwent Sanger sequencing and/or custom Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels between 2020 and 2023. Clinical, dermoscopic, and RCM images were reviewed and compared between variant-positive and variant-negative groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Germline variants in moderate- to high-risk melanoma genes were found in 15 patients. Carriers were diagnosed at a younger age (41.8 ± 10.1 vs. 53.5 ± 10.4; P < .001), had a more frequent family history of melanoma (P = .015), more melanomas arising from pre-existing nevi (P < .001), and less actinic damage (P = .045). CDKN2A carriers were younger (38.9 ± 11.4 vs. 45.3 ± 7.8) and had fewer melanomas (2.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2; P = .05) than MITF or POT1 carriers. CDKN2A carriers had low (n=5), medium (n=1), or high (n=2) nevus counts, while MITF carriers had medium (n=1) to high (n=4) counts. Dermoscopically, variant carriers showed fewer regression structures (8.3% vs. 39.8%; P = .010). RCM findings indicated a non-significant trend toward more dendritic cell-type melanomas in non-carriers (33.9% vs. 19.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MPM patients with germline variants demonstrate distinct clinical and imaging profiles compared to non-carriers. These findings support personalized surveillance in high-risk individuals and the integration of genetic testing into melanoma management. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine genotype-phenotype associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Familial melanoma represents approximately 10% of cutaneous melanomas. Individuals with pathogenic germline variants have a higher risk of developing multiple primary melanomas (MPM). However, differences in clinical, dermoscopic, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features between variant carriers and non-carriers are not well established.

Objective: To compare clinical, dermoscopic, and RCM characteristics of MPM patients with and without germline variants associated with familial melanoma.

Methods: This retrospective study included 45 MPM patients who underwent Sanger sequencing and/or custom Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels between 2020 and 2023. Clinical, dermoscopic, and RCM images were reviewed and compared between variant-positive and variant-negative groups.

Results: Germline variants in moderate- to high-risk melanoma genes were found in 15 patients. Carriers were diagnosed at a younger age (41.8 ± 10.1 vs. 53.5 ± 10.4; P < .001), had a more frequent family history of melanoma (P = .015), more melanomas arising from pre-existing nevi (P < .001), and less actinic damage (P = .045). CDKN2A carriers were younger (38.9 ± 11.4 vs. 45.3 ± 7.8) and had fewer melanomas (2.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2; P = .05) than MITF or POT1 carriers. CDKN2A carriers had low (n=5), medium (n=1), or high (n=2) nevus counts, while MITF carriers had medium (n=1) to high (n=4) counts. Dermoscopically, variant carriers showed fewer regression structures (8.3% vs. 39.8%; P = .010). RCM findings indicated a non-significant trend toward more dendritic cell-type melanomas in non-carriers (33.9% vs. 19.4%).

Conclusion: MPM patients with germline variants demonstrate distinct clinical and imaging profiles compared to non-carriers. These findings support personalized surveillance in high-risk individuals and the integration of genetic testing into melanoma management. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine genotype-phenotype associations.

临床,皮肤镜和共聚焦显微镜特征的多发性原发性黑色素瘤根据种系变异状态:回顾性,医院为基础的研究。
背景:家族性黑色素瘤约占皮肤黑色素瘤的10%。具有致病性种系变异的个体患多发性原发性黑色素瘤(MPM)的风险较高。然而,变异携带者和非携带者在临床、皮肤镜和反射共聚焦显微镜(RCM)特征上的差异尚未得到很好的确定。目的:比较有和没有与家族性黑色素瘤相关的种系变异的MPM患者的临床、皮肤镜和RCM特征。方法:本回顾性研究包括45例MPM患者,他们在2020年至2023年间接受了Sanger测序和/或定制的下一代测序(NGS)面板。对变异阳性组和变异阴性组的临床、皮肤镜和RCM图像进行回顾和比较。结果:在15例患者中发现了中度至高危黑色素瘤基因的种系变异。携带者的诊断年龄更小(41.8±10.1比53.5±10.4,P < 0.001),黑色素瘤家族史更频繁(P = 0.015),既往黑色素瘤发生率更高(P < 0.001),光化损伤发生率更低(P = 0.045)。CDKN2A携带者比MITF或POT1携带者更年轻(38.9±11.4比45.3±7.8),黑色素瘤发生率更低(2.7±1.3比4.1±1.2;P = 0.05)。CDKN2A携带者痣计数低(n=5)、中(n=1)或高(n=2),而MITF携带者痣计数中(n=1)至高(n=4)。皮肤镜下,变异携带者显示较少的回归结构(8.3%比39.8%;P = 0.010)。RCM结果显示,非携带者中出现更多树突状细胞型黑色素瘤的趋势不明显(33.9% vs. 19.4%)。结论:与非携带者相比,生殖系变异的MPM患者表现出不同的临床和影像学特征。这些发现支持对高危人群进行个性化监测,并将基因检测整合到黑色素瘤管理中。进一步的研究需要更大的队列来完善基因型-表型的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信