Care Delivery Strategies for Anxiety, Depression, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Tourette Syndrome to Improve Health Outcomes in Children and Youth.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Tamara Pringsheim, Lindsay Gaudet, Jennifer Pillay, Lisa Hartling, Natalia Szejko, Julian Fletcher, Gabrielle Wilcox, Scott Patten, Ryan Zang, Davide Martino
{"title":"Care Delivery Strategies for Anxiety, Depression, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Tourette Syndrome to Improve Health Outcomes in Children and Youth.","authors":"Tamara Pringsheim, Lindsay Gaudet, Jennifer Pillay, Lisa Hartling, Natalia Szejko, Julian Fletcher, Gabrielle Wilcox, Scott Patten, Ryan Zang, Davide Martino","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01897-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this rapid review was to identify effective care delivery strategies for children and youth with anxiety, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette syndrome (TS) to inform the development of Canadian standards for mental health care provision. The review was developed using the Cochrane organization's minimum standards for Rapid Reviews.The eligible population was children and youth with anxiety disorders, depressive disorder, OCD, or TS. We included comparative studies published since 2010 evaluating the effect on health outcomes of care delivery strategies for diagnosis, assessment and/or treatment of anxiety, depression, OCD, or TS compared to usual care, sham intervention, or no treatment. Thirty-seven studies were included, with sixteen studies pertaining to anxiety, seven to depression, seven to OCD and seven to TS. While a few studies were published on the use of stepped care models in anxiety, depression and OCD, the majority of research studies published in the past 15 years sought to establish if alternative delivery systems for psychological therapies (i.e. by telephone, videoconference, online with minimal therapist involvement) are superior to waitlist or attention controls, or similar in efficacy to face-to-face delivery across these four conditions. Although data are emerging on the cost-effectiveness of online psychological therapies, the evidence summarized here confirms that online approaches are a possible way of ensuring access to these standards of care in rural and remote communities and increasing accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01897-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this rapid review was to identify effective care delivery strategies for children and youth with anxiety, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette syndrome (TS) to inform the development of Canadian standards for mental health care provision. The review was developed using the Cochrane organization's minimum standards for Rapid Reviews.The eligible population was children and youth with anxiety disorders, depressive disorder, OCD, or TS. We included comparative studies published since 2010 evaluating the effect on health outcomes of care delivery strategies for diagnosis, assessment and/or treatment of anxiety, depression, OCD, or TS compared to usual care, sham intervention, or no treatment. Thirty-seven studies were included, with sixteen studies pertaining to anxiety, seven to depression, seven to OCD and seven to TS. While a few studies were published on the use of stepped care models in anxiety, depression and OCD, the majority of research studies published in the past 15 years sought to establish if alternative delivery systems for psychological therapies (i.e. by telephone, videoconference, online with minimal therapist involvement) are superior to waitlist or attention controls, or similar in efficacy to face-to-face delivery across these four conditions. Although data are emerging on the cost-effectiveness of online psychological therapies, the evidence summarized here confirms that online approaches are a possible way of ensuring access to these standards of care in rural and remote communities and increasing accessibility.

焦虑、抑郁、强迫症和抽动秽语综合征的护理策略以改善儿童和青少年的健康结果。
这项快速回顾的目的是为患有焦虑、抑郁、强迫症(OCD)和图雷特综合征(TS)的儿童和青少年确定有效的护理提供策略,为加拿大精神卫生保健提供标准的制定提供信息。该评价是使用Cochrane组织快速评价的最低标准制定的。符合条件的人群是患有焦虑症、抑郁症、强迫症或TS的儿童和青少年。我们纳入了自2010年以来发表的比较研究,评估了与常规护理、虚假干预或不治疗相比,诊断、评估和/或治疗焦虑症、抑郁症、强迫症或TS的护理提供策略对健康结果的影响。37项研究被纳入,其中16项研究与焦虑有关,7项与抑郁有关,7项与强迫症有关,7项与TS有关。虽然有少数研究发表了关于在焦虑、抑郁和强迫症中使用阶梯式护理模式的研究,但过去15年发表的大多数研究都试图建立心理治疗的替代传递系统(即通过电话、视频会议、在这四种情况下,在线治疗(治疗师参与最少)优于候补名单或注意力控制,或者在效果上与面对面治疗相似。尽管关于在线心理治疗的成本效益的数据正在出现,但本文总结的证据证实,在线方法是确保农村和偏远社区获得这些标准护理并增加可及性的可能方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信