Causes and incidental neuroimaging findings in pharmacologically confirmed Horner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 134 cases.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Samira Jafari, Edward Margolin, Jonathan A Micieli
{"title":"Causes and incidental neuroimaging findings in pharmacologically confirmed Horner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 134 cases.","authors":"Samira Jafari, Edward Margolin, Jonathan A Micieli","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of structural causes in pharmacologically confirmed Horner syndrome (HS) and assess the clinical significance of incidental neuroimaging findings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 134 patients with pharmacologically confirmed HS who underwent neuroimaging at a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinic between July 2018 and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neuroimaging findings were reviewed and categorized as either structural causes of HS or incidental. Incidental findings were further classified on the basis of their clinical relevance and need for follow-up. Cases were stratified by symptom duration into acute (<21 days), subacute (21 days to 3 months), and chronic (>3 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A structural cause for HS was identified in 14.9% (n = 20) of patients, with higher detection rates in acute (26.0%) and subacute (21.4%) presentations compared to chronic cases (6.5%). The most common causes were internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection (3.0%) and ICA aneurysm (2.2%). Incidental findings were observed in 35.6% (n = 47) of patients, most commonly microangiopathic changes (10%), sinus/mucosal changes (3%), and thyroid nodules (3%). While 18.2% (n = 24) of patients required routine follow-up, only 1.5% (n = 2) needed urgent follow-up, and none required emergency intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structural causes of HS are more frequently identified in acute and subacute presentations, supporting early imaging, especially to rule out ICA dissection. In chronic HS, selective imaging may be appropriate due to lower diagnostic yield. The high rate of incidental findings underscores the need for careful interpretation to optimize resource use and avoid unnecessary investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.08.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of structural causes in pharmacologically confirmed Horner syndrome (HS) and assess the clinical significance of incidental neuroimaging findings.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Participants: A total of 134 patients with pharmacologically confirmed HS who underwent neuroimaging at a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinic between July 2018 and June 2024.

Methods: Neuroimaging findings were reviewed and categorized as either structural causes of HS or incidental. Incidental findings were further classified on the basis of their clinical relevance and need for follow-up. Cases were stratified by symptom duration into acute (<21 days), subacute (21 days to 3 months), and chronic (>3 months).

Results: A structural cause for HS was identified in 14.9% (n = 20) of patients, with higher detection rates in acute (26.0%) and subacute (21.4%) presentations compared to chronic cases (6.5%). The most common causes were internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection (3.0%) and ICA aneurysm (2.2%). Incidental findings were observed in 35.6% (n = 47) of patients, most commonly microangiopathic changes (10%), sinus/mucosal changes (3%), and thyroid nodules (3%). While 18.2% (n = 24) of patients required routine follow-up, only 1.5% (n = 2) needed urgent follow-up, and none required emergency intervention.

Conclusions: Structural causes of HS are more frequently identified in acute and subacute presentations, supporting early imaging, especially to rule out ICA dissection. In chronic HS, selective imaging may be appropriate due to lower diagnostic yield. The high rate of incidental findings underscores the need for careful interpretation to optimize resource use and avoid unnecessary investigations.

药理学证实的霍纳综合征的病因和偶然神经影像学发现:134例回顾性队列研究。
目的:了解经药理学证实的霍纳综合征(HS)中结构原因的发生率,并评价其附带神经影像学表现的临床意义。设计:回顾性队列研究。参与者:2018年7月至2024年6月期间在三级神经眼科诊所接受神经影像学检查的134例药理学证实的HS患者。方法:回顾神经影像学表现,并将其归类为结构性原因或偶然原因。根据其临床相关性和随访需要对偶发发现进行进一步分类。按症状持续时间分为急性期(3个月)。结果:14.9% (n = 20)的患者被确定为HS的结构性原因,急性(26.0%)和亚急性(21.4%)的检出率高于慢性病例(6.5%)。最常见的原因是颈内动脉夹层(3.0%)和颈内动脉瘤(2.2%)。35.6% (n = 47)的患者有意外发现,最常见的是微血管病变(10%)、窦/粘膜病变(3%)和甲状腺结节(3%)。18.2% (n = 24)的患者需要常规随访,只有1.5% (n = 2)的患者需要紧急随访,没有患者需要紧急干预。结论:HS的结构性原因在急性和亚急性表现中更常见,支持早期成像,特别是排除ICA夹层。在慢性HS中,由于诊断率较低,选择性影像学可能是合适的。偶然发现的高比率强调需要仔细解释,以优化资源利用和避免不必要的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信