Comparative cardiovascular outcomes and safety of hypoglycemic drug classes in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a multicenter cohort analysis.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhiyuan Wei, Wanqian Xu, Yu Wang, Yu Tian, Zhongmin Wang, Shenqi Jing, Weina Liu, Sipeng Shen, Chenlong Qin, Xin Zhang, Jingsong Li, Yun Liu
{"title":"Comparative cardiovascular outcomes and safety of hypoglycemic drug classes in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a multicenter cohort analysis.","authors":"Zhiyuan Wei, Wanqian Xu, Yu Wang, Yu Tian, Zhongmin Wang, Shenqi Jing, Weina Liu, Sipeng Shen, Chenlong Qin, Xin Zhang, Jingsong Li, Yun Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02892-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. However, real-world evidence comparing the CV effectiveness and safety of major hypoglycemic drug classes remains limited in this population. This multicenter pooled analysis aims to directly compare the CV outcomes and safety profiles of these key agents in patients with T2D and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health records from two databases in a cohort study of T2D patients with hypertension who had initiated metformin as first-line therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks of 3-/4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and safety outcomes across drug classes added to metformin: insulin, sulfonylureas (SUs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), glinides, acarbose, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with insulin, GLP-1 RAs, DPP4is, and glinides were associated with a lower risk of 3-point MACE (HR: 0.48 [0.31-0.76], 0.70 [0.57-0.85], and 0.70 [0.52-0.94], respectively). SUs were associated with a higher risk of 3-point MACE compared with DPP4is (HR: 1.30 [1.06-1.59]). DPP4is, GLP-1 RAs, and glinides showed a lower risk of 3-point MACE compared with acarbose (HR: 0.62 [0.51-0.76], 0.47 [0.29-0.75], and 0.59 [0.43-0.81], respectively). Similar patterns were observed for 4-point MACE. For safety outcomes, DPP4is were associated with a reduced risk of chronic kidney disease, while insulin use was associated with reduced risks of inflammatory polyarthritis and insomnia. However, DPP4is were associated with higher risks of coronary atherosclerotic diseases and hypertensive heart disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the differential cardiovascular effectiveness and safety profiles of hypoglycemic therapies in real-world settings, providing valuable insights for optimizing T2D management, particularly in patients with comorbid hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02892-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. However, real-world evidence comparing the CV effectiveness and safety of major hypoglycemic drug classes remains limited in this population. This multicenter pooled analysis aims to directly compare the CV outcomes and safety profiles of these key agents in patients with T2D and hypertension.

Methods: We analyzed electronic health records from two databases in a cohort study of T2D patients with hypertension who had initiated metformin as first-line therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks of 3-/4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and safety outcomes across drug classes added to metformin: insulin, sulfonylureas (SUs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), glinides, acarbose, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

Results: Compared with insulin, GLP-1 RAs, DPP4is, and glinides were associated with a lower risk of 3-point MACE (HR: 0.48 [0.31-0.76], 0.70 [0.57-0.85], and 0.70 [0.52-0.94], respectively). SUs were associated with a higher risk of 3-point MACE compared with DPP4is (HR: 1.30 [1.06-1.59]). DPP4is, GLP-1 RAs, and glinides showed a lower risk of 3-point MACE compared with acarbose (HR: 0.62 [0.51-0.76], 0.47 [0.29-0.75], and 0.59 [0.43-0.81], respectively). Similar patterns were observed for 4-point MACE. For safety outcomes, DPP4is were associated with a reduced risk of chronic kidney disease, while insulin use was associated with reduced risks of inflammatory polyarthritis and insomnia. However, DPP4is were associated with higher risks of coronary atherosclerotic diseases and hypertensive heart disease.

Conclusions: This study highlights the differential cardiovascular effectiveness and safety profiles of hypoglycemic therapies in real-world settings, providing valuable insights for optimizing T2D management, particularly in patients with comorbid hypertension.

比较2型糖尿病和高血压患者降糖药物类别的心血管结局和安全性:一项多中心队列分析
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)和高血压患者发生不良心血管事件的风险增加。然而,比较主要降糖药物类别的CV有效性和安全性的真实证据在这一人群中仍然有限。这项多中心汇总分析旨在直接比较这些关键药物在T2D和高血压患者中的CV结果和安全性。方法:在一项队列研究中,我们分析了两个数据库中t2dm高血压患者的电子健康记录,这些患者已开始使用二甲双胍作为一线治疗。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和Cox比例风险模型来比较添加到二甲双胍的药物类别:胰岛素、磺酰脲类药物(SUs)、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4is)、格列奈德、阿卡波糖和钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)的3 /4点主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险和安全性结果。结果:与胰岛素相比,GLP-1 RAs、DPP4is和格列尼德与3点MACE的风险较低(HR分别为0.48[0.31-0.76]、0.70[0.57-0.85]和0.70[0.52-0.94])。与DPP4is相比,SUs与更高的3点MACE风险相关(HR: 1.30[1.06-1.59])。DPP4is、GLP-1 RAs和格列尼德发生3点MACE的风险较阿卡波糖低(HR分别为0.62[0.51-0.76]、0.47[0.29-0.75]和0.59[0.43-0.81])。在4点MACE中观察到类似的模式。对于安全性结果,dpp4与慢性肾脏疾病风险降低相关,而胰岛素使用与炎症性多发性关节炎和失眠风险降低相关。然而,dpp4与冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病和高血压心脏病的高风险相关。结论:本研究强调了现实环境中降糖治疗的心血管有效性和安全性的差异,为优化T2D管理提供了有价值的见解,特别是对合并高血压的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信