Relative validity of food and nutrient intakes derived from a brief-type diet history questionnaire for Japanese children and adolescents.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hitomi Okubo, Ryoko Tajima, Nana Shinozaki, Shizuko Masayasu, Satoshi Sasaki, Kentaro Murakami
{"title":"Relative validity of food and nutrient intakes derived from a brief-type diet history questionnaire for Japanese children and adolescents.","authors":"Hitomi Okubo, Ryoko Tajima, Nana Shinozaki, Shizuko Masayasu, Satoshi Sasaki, Kentaro Murakami","doi":"10.1017/S0007114525104042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity of food and nutrient intakes estimated by a brief-type diet history questionnaire for Japanese children and adolescents (BDHQ15y) designed to assess habitual dietary intake during the previous month. A total of 432 boys and 412 girls aged 6-17 years from thirty-two prefectures in Japan completed the BDHQ15y and subsequently provided 8-day weighed dietary records (DR) on two non-consecutive days over four seasons for comparison. Among the intakes of forty-four nutrients and thirty-one food groups adjusted for energy intake using the density model, the BDHQ15y showed percentage differences in median intake of less than 10 % compared with the DR for nineteen nutrients in both sexes, as well as for eleven and seven food groups in boys and girls, respectively, indicating good agreement for key nutrients and food groups, including protein, fat, carbohydrate, dietary fibre, grains, vegetables, dairy products and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). The median values (25th-75th percentiles) of Spearman's correlation coefficients in boys and girls were 0·33 (0·28-0·38) and 0·28 (0·23-0·35) for nutrients, respectively, and 0·36 (0·29-0·42) and 0·29 (0·24-0·36) for food groups, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed wide limits of agreement, with overestimation at higher intakes for most nutrients and food groups, except SSB. In conclusion, the BDHQ15y shows promise for large-scale dietary monitoring, particularly for estimating group-level intakes of key nutrients and food groups. However, its limited ability to rank individual intakes and the variability in individual-level assessments necessitate cautious interpretation and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525104042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity of food and nutrient intakes estimated by a brief-type diet history questionnaire for Japanese children and adolescents (BDHQ15y) designed to assess habitual dietary intake during the previous month. A total of 432 boys and 412 girls aged 6-17 years from thirty-two prefectures in Japan completed the BDHQ15y and subsequently provided 8-day weighed dietary records (DR) on two non-consecutive days over four seasons for comparison. Among the intakes of forty-four nutrients and thirty-one food groups adjusted for energy intake using the density model, the BDHQ15y showed percentage differences in median intake of less than 10 % compared with the DR for nineteen nutrients in both sexes, as well as for eleven and seven food groups in boys and girls, respectively, indicating good agreement for key nutrients and food groups, including protein, fat, carbohydrate, dietary fibre, grains, vegetables, dairy products and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). The median values (25th-75th percentiles) of Spearman's correlation coefficients in boys and girls were 0·33 (0·28-0·38) and 0·28 (0·23-0·35) for nutrients, respectively, and 0·36 (0·29-0·42) and 0·29 (0·24-0·36) for food groups, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed wide limits of agreement, with overestimation at higher intakes for most nutrients and food groups, except SSB. In conclusion, the BDHQ15y shows promise for large-scale dietary monitoring, particularly for estimating group-level intakes of key nutrients and food groups. However, its limited ability to rank individual intakes and the variability in individual-level assessments necessitate cautious interpretation and application.

从日本儿童和青少年的简短饮食史问卷得出的食物和营养摄入的相对效度。
本研究的目的是评估食物和营养摄入的相对有效性,该有效性是通过日本儿童和青少年的简短饮食史问卷(BDHQ15y)来评估前一个月的习惯性饮食摄入。来自日本32个县的6-17岁的432名男孩和412名女孩完成了BDHQ15y,随后在四个季节的两个非连续日提供了8天的体重饮食记录(DR)进行比较。在使用密度模型调整能量摄入的44种营养素和31种食物组的摄入量中,BDHQ15y显示,与DR相比,男女19种营养素以及男孩和女孩分别有11种和7种食物组的中位数摄入量的百分比差异小于10%,这表明关键营养素和食物组的一致性很好,包括蛋白质,脂肪,碳水化合物,膳食纤维,谷物,蔬菜,乳制品和含糖饮料(SSB)营养成分组的Spearman相关系数中位数(25 ~ 75百分位数)分别为0.33(0.28 ~ 0.38)和0.28(0.23 ~ 0.35),食物组的Spearman相关系数中位数分别为0.36(0.29 ~ 0.42)和0.29(0.24 ~ 0.36)。Bland-Altman图显示了广泛的一致性,除了SSB外,大多数营养素和食物组的高摄入量都被高估了。总之,BDHQ15y显示了大规模饮食监测的前景,特别是在估计关键营养素和食物组的群体摄入量方面。然而,它对个人摄入量进行排名的能力有限,个人水平评估的可变性需要谨慎解释和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信