A population-level comparison analysis of red meat, white meat and vegetable consumption among adults aged 60+ years before, during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in regional China.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Guilin Zhang, Haidi Wu, Tianrui Deng, Huiqing Xu, Yunting Xu, Guofeng Ao, Fei Xu, Jian Kang
{"title":"A population-level comparison analysis of red meat, white meat and vegetable consumption among adults aged 60+ years before, during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in regional China.","authors":"Guilin Zhang, Haidi Wu, Tianrui Deng, Huiqing Xu, Yunting Xu, Guofeng Ao, Fei Xu, Jian Kang","doi":"10.1017/S0007114525104121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared red meat, white meat and vegetable consumption before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in regional China. Data were collected from urban individuals aged 60+ years in Nanjing municipality in 2018, 2021 and 2023. Differences in food intake frequencies between participants and survey years were examined. Logistic regression models were employed to identify influencing factors of meat, and vegetable consumption. Totally, 13 792 participants were analysed, with 4355, 4622 and 4815 from 2018, 2021 and 2023 surveys, respectively. The mean weekly intake frequency (sd) in 2018, 2021 and 2023 was, separately, 3·85 (sd 2·83), 3·21 (sd 2·90) and 4·71 (sd 3·94) for red meat; 1·38 (sd 1·21), 2·08 (sd 1·90) and 2·73 (sd 2·55) for white meat; and 10·98 (sd 4·84), 10·00 (sd 5·04) and 10·34 (sd 5·04) for vegetable. Moreover, 23·2, 32·6 and 52·3 % of participants met the recommendation for meat intake, while 53·7, 46·8 and 49·6 % reached vegetable intake recommendation before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Meat intake was positively associated with education, marital status and drinking, but negatively associated with age. Additionally, education and marital status were in negative relation to vegetable consumption, while smoking and drinking were positively associated with vegetable intake. The older residents consumed less red meat and vegetable but more white meat during COVID-19 pandemic, and their consumption levels of meat and vegetable went up after the pandemic. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to support older adults' dietary habits during emergency events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525104121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared red meat, white meat and vegetable consumption before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in regional China. Data were collected from urban individuals aged 60+ years in Nanjing municipality in 2018, 2021 and 2023. Differences in food intake frequencies between participants and survey years were examined. Logistic regression models were employed to identify influencing factors of meat, and vegetable consumption. Totally, 13 792 participants were analysed, with 4355, 4622 and 4815 from 2018, 2021 and 2023 surveys, respectively. The mean weekly intake frequency (sd) in 2018, 2021 and 2023 was, separately, 3·85 (sd 2·83), 3·21 (sd 2·90) and 4·71 (sd 3·94) for red meat; 1·38 (sd 1·21), 2·08 (sd 1·90) and 2·73 (sd 2·55) for white meat; and 10·98 (sd 4·84), 10·00 (sd 5·04) and 10·34 (sd 5·04) for vegetable. Moreover, 23·2, 32·6 and 52·3 % of participants met the recommendation for meat intake, while 53·7, 46·8 and 49·6 % reached vegetable intake recommendation before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Meat intake was positively associated with education, marital status and drinking, but negatively associated with age. Additionally, education and marital status were in negative relation to vegetable consumption, while smoking and drinking were positively associated with vegetable intake. The older residents consumed less red meat and vegetable but more white meat during COVID-19 pandemic, and their consumption levels of meat and vegetable went up after the pandemic. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to support older adults' dietary habits during emergency events.

在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前、期间和之后,中国地区60岁以上成年人红肉、白肉和蔬菜消费的人口水平比较分析
本研究比较了中国地区老年人在COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后的红肉、白肉和蔬菜消费。数据收集于2018年、2021年和2023年南京市60岁以上的城市老年人。研究人员检查了参与者和调查年份之间食物摄入频率的差异。采用Logistic回归模型确定肉类和蔬菜消费的影响因素。总共分析了13792名参与者,分别来自2018年、2021年和2023年的4355名、4622名和4815名。2018年、2021年和2023年红肉的平均每周摄入频率(sd)分别为3.85 (sd 2.83)、3.21 (sd 2.90)和4.71 (sd 3.94);白肉为1.38 (sd 1.21)、2.08 (sd 1.90)和2.73 (sd 2.55);蔬菜为10.98 (sd 4.84)、10.00 (sd 5.04)、10.34 (sd 5.04)。此外,在COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后,23.2%、32.6%和52.3%的参与者达到了建议的肉类摄入量,53.7%、46.8%和49.6%的参与者分别达到了建议的蔬菜摄入量。肉类摄入量与教育程度、婚姻状况和饮酒呈正相关,但与年龄负相关。此外,教育程度和婚姻状况与蔬菜摄入量呈负相关,而吸烟和饮酒与蔬菜摄入量呈正相关。新冠肺炎大流行期间,老年居民红肉和蔬菜消费量减少,白肉消费量增加,大流行后,老年居民肉类和蔬菜消费量上升。这些发现突出表明,需要采取有针对性的干预措施,在紧急事件期间支持老年人的饮食习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信