Characteristics of gut and lung microbiota in patients with lung masses and their relationship with clinical features.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Yanping Yang, Jiacheng Shen, Sulan Wei, Maosong Ye, Xing Zhao, Jian Zhou, Lin Tong, Jie Hu, Yuanlin Song, Shengdi Wu, Nuo Xu
{"title":"Characteristics of gut and lung microbiota in patients with lung masses and their relationship with clinical features.","authors":"Yanping Yang, Jiacheng Shen, Sulan Wei, Maosong Ye, Xing Zhao, Jian Zhou, Lin Tong, Jie Hu, Yuanlin Song, Shengdi Wu, Nuo Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-04325-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The exploration of how dysbiosis relates to lung masses is still nascent, with few studies focusing on the microbial characteristics across various sites. Therefore, we categorized the microbiota into feces and bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) groups to compare microbial characteristics between benign and malignant masses, analyze their clinical correlations, and develop predictive models for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 238 fecal samples and 34 BALF samples were collected from patients with benign and malignant masses and then analyzed by 16 SrRNA. We explored the distinct composition of the gut and lung microbiota and their associations with clinical features. The diagnostic models were constructed using microbial features identified through two approaches: random forest algorithm with five-fold cross-validation and comparative analysis of significantly differential taxa. The performance evaluation was subsequently conducted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in α-and β-diversity between feces and BALF groups. The relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group (P = 0.003232) and Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-003 (P = 0.01316) in feces group and Proteobacteria (P = 0.03654) in BALF group were significantly increased in lung cancer patients. We also found Bacteroides (P = 0.01458) was abundant in NSCLC than those of SCLC in feces group, while the BALF group was dominated by norank_c_Cyanobacteria (P = 0.03384). Smoking history appeared to be related to the distribution of microbiota, with enrichment of Parabacteroides (P = 0.02054) in feces and Prevotella_1 (P = 0.03286) in BALF. Furthermore, the patients with Sellimonas (P = 0.04148) in feces and Alloprevotella (P = 0.04283) in BALF seemed to have better response to chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. For differentiating benign and malignant masses, the combination of Megasphaera and norank_p__Saccharibacteria in BALF demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an AUC reaching 0.8 (95% CI 0.59-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The microbiota composition significantly differed between benign and malignant masses in both fecal and BALF groups, with minimal evidence supporting microbial migration between these two sites. Our findings suggest that BALF microbiota may serve as a more reliable biomarker for lung masses classification, offering valuable insights for early diagnosis and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04325-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The exploration of how dysbiosis relates to lung masses is still nascent, with few studies focusing on the microbial characteristics across various sites. Therefore, we categorized the microbiota into feces and bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) groups to compare microbial characteristics between benign and malignant masses, analyze their clinical correlations, and develop predictive models for lung cancer.

Methods: A total of 238 fecal samples and 34 BALF samples were collected from patients with benign and malignant masses and then analyzed by 16 SrRNA. We explored the distinct composition of the gut and lung microbiota and their associations with clinical features. The diagnostic models were constructed using microbial features identified through two approaches: random forest algorithm with five-fold cross-validation and comparative analysis of significantly differential taxa. The performance evaluation was subsequently conducted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: There was no significant difference in α-and β-diversity between feces and BALF groups. The relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group (P = 0.003232) and Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-003 (P = 0.01316) in feces group and Proteobacteria (P = 0.03654) in BALF group were significantly increased in lung cancer patients. We also found Bacteroides (P = 0.01458) was abundant in NSCLC than those of SCLC in feces group, while the BALF group was dominated by norank_c_Cyanobacteria (P = 0.03384). Smoking history appeared to be related to the distribution of microbiota, with enrichment of Parabacteroides (P = 0.02054) in feces and Prevotella_1 (P = 0.03286) in BALF. Furthermore, the patients with Sellimonas (P = 0.04148) in feces and Alloprevotella (P = 0.04283) in BALF seemed to have better response to chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. For differentiating benign and malignant masses, the combination of Megasphaera and norank_p__Saccharibacteria in BALF demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an AUC reaching 0.8 (95% CI 0.59-1).

Conclusion: The microbiota composition significantly differed between benign and malignant masses in both fecal and BALF groups, with minimal evidence supporting microbial migration between these two sites. Our findings suggest that BALF microbiota may serve as a more reliable biomarker for lung masses classification, offering valuable insights for early diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

肺肿块患者肠道和肺部微生物群特征及其与临床特征的关系。
目的:对生态失调与肺肿块之间关系的探索尚处于起步阶段,很少有研究关注不同部位的微生物特征。因此,我们将微生物群分为粪便和支气管肺泡液(BALF)组,比较良性和恶性肿块的微生物特征,分析它们的临床相关性,并建立肺癌的预测模型。方法:收集良恶性肿物患者粪便238份,BALF 34份,采用16种SrRNA进行分析。我们探索了肠道和肺部微生物群的独特组成及其与临床特征的关联。采用随机森林五倍交叉验证算法和显著差异分类群对比分析两种方法识别微生物特征,构建诊断模型。随后采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析进行绩效评价。结果:粪便组与BALF组间α、β多样性无显著差异。肺癌患者粪便组Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group (P = 0.003232)和BALF组Proteobacteria (P = 0.03654)的相对丰度均显著升高。我们还发现NSCLC中Bacteroides (P = 0.01458)多于SCLC粪便组,而BALF组以norank_c_Cyanobacteria (P = 0.03384)为主。吸烟史似乎与微生物群分布有关,粪便中副杆菌(P = 0.02054)和BALF中Prevotella_1 (P = 0.03286)富集。此外,粪便中有沙门氏菌(P = 0.04148)和BALF中有异丙普氏菌(P = 0.04283)的患者对化疗联合免疫治疗的反应更好。对于良恶性肿块的鉴别,BALF中Megasphaera和norank_p_saccharibacteria的组合表现出较好的预测效果,AUC达到0.8 (95% CI 0.59-1)。结论:粪便组和BALF组良性和恶性肿块的微生物群组成存在显著差异,很少有证据支持微生物在这两个部位之间迁移。我们的研究结果表明,BALF微生物群可能作为肺肿块分类的更可靠的生物标志物,为早期诊断和临床决策提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信