Quality of counseling for self-administering injectable contraception: field evidence from mystery client interactions in Lagos, Nigeria.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sneha Challa, Calvin Chiu, Ayobambo Jegede, Ivan Idiodi, Mikail Aliyu, Chioma Okoli, Shakede Dimowo, Aminat Tijani, Awawu Grace Nmadu, Rodio Diallo, Jenny Liu, Elizabeth Omoluabi
{"title":"Quality of counseling for self-administering injectable contraception: field evidence from mystery client interactions in Lagos, Nigeria.","authors":"Sneha Challa, Calvin Chiu, Ayobambo Jegede, Ivan Idiodi, Mikail Aliyu, Chioma Okoli, Shakede Dimowo, Aminat Tijani, Awawu Grace Nmadu, Rodio Diallo, Jenny Liu, Elizabeth Omoluabi","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03946-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-injection (SI) of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) is a self-care intervention (drugs, diagnostics, or devices that can be provided mostly outside the health system) implemented across Nigeria. Per national guidelines, first-time DMPA-SC users can obtain units for SI after two in-person training visits. Success of self-care interventions, the option for SI included, depends on local policies and individual providers to create an enabling environment. Thus, we aimed to 1) assess providers' fidelity to Ministry of Health protocols; 2) assess the extent of bias in fidelity; and 3) to asses client-centeredness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight mystery client actors portrayed an older, married woman or a younger, unmarried woman without DMPA-SC experience. They sought contraception, including DMPA-SC for SI, at 30 public and 30 private facilities. A total of 120 interactions were planned (two per facility-one by each profile). Immediately following their interactions, actors completed a debrief survey about their experiences. Using responses from these debrief surveys, we described key actor-reported outcomes (providers' fidelity to Ministry of Health protocols for SI dispensing, SI training, and supporting contraceptive decision-making). We also examined objective and subjective client-centeredness outcomes. We assessed bias in fidelity and client-centeredness through bivariate tests for differences by actor profile (younger/unmarried vs older/married) and facility type (health facility vs pharmacy/PPMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fidelity to dispensing guidelines (i.e., refusing DMPA-SC units for SI) differed by facility type (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.4, p-value < 0.001). Descriptively, pharmacists/PPMVs more often broke with protocol and were willing to dispense DMPA-SC units. Similarly, fidelity to Ministry of Health training guidelines on DMPA-SC for SI differed by facility type (χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.9, p-value = 0.007). Client-centeredness outcomes (e.g., being asked about and feeling treated differently based on age and marital status) were found to differ by actor profile. Descriptively, more of the younger, unmarried profile actors reported these outcomes compared to older, married profile actors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Willingness to dispense DMPA-SC for SI differed by facility type but not by client profile. However, younger, unmarried profile actors experienced more scrutiny from providers. These findings indicate a need for clarifying service provision protocols to ensure an enabling environment for women's access to and use of self-injectable contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 Suppl 1","pages":"399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03946-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-injection (SI) of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) is a self-care intervention (drugs, diagnostics, or devices that can be provided mostly outside the health system) implemented across Nigeria. Per national guidelines, first-time DMPA-SC users can obtain units for SI after two in-person training visits. Success of self-care interventions, the option for SI included, depends on local policies and individual providers to create an enabling environment. Thus, we aimed to 1) assess providers' fidelity to Ministry of Health protocols; 2) assess the extent of bias in fidelity; and 3) to asses client-centeredness.

Methods: Eight mystery client actors portrayed an older, married woman or a younger, unmarried woman without DMPA-SC experience. They sought contraception, including DMPA-SC for SI, at 30 public and 30 private facilities. A total of 120 interactions were planned (two per facility-one by each profile). Immediately following their interactions, actors completed a debrief survey about their experiences. Using responses from these debrief surveys, we described key actor-reported outcomes (providers' fidelity to Ministry of Health protocols for SI dispensing, SI training, and supporting contraceptive decision-making). We also examined objective and subjective client-centeredness outcomes. We assessed bias in fidelity and client-centeredness through bivariate tests for differences by actor profile (younger/unmarried vs older/married) and facility type (health facility vs pharmacy/PPMV).

Results: Fidelity to dispensing guidelines (i.e., refusing DMPA-SC units for SI) differed by facility type (χ2 = 12.4, p-value < 0.001). Descriptively, pharmacists/PPMVs more often broke with protocol and were willing to dispense DMPA-SC units. Similarly, fidelity to Ministry of Health training guidelines on DMPA-SC for SI differed by facility type (χ2 = 9.9, p-value = 0.007). Client-centeredness outcomes (e.g., being asked about and feeling treated differently based on age and marital status) were found to differ by actor profile. Descriptively, more of the younger, unmarried profile actors reported these outcomes compared to older, married profile actors.

Conclusions: Willingness to dispense DMPA-SC for SI differed by facility type but not by client profile. However, younger, unmarried profile actors experienced more scrutiny from providers. These findings indicate a need for clarifying service provision protocols to ensure an enabling environment for women's access to and use of self-injectable contraception.

Abstract Image

自我管理注射避孕药的咨询质量:来自尼日利亚拉各斯神秘客户互动的现场证据。
背景:皮下储存醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA-SC)自我注射(SI)是在尼日利亚实施的一种自我保健干预(药物、诊断或设备,大部分可在卫生系统外提供)。根据国家指南,首次使用DMPA-SC的用户可以在两次亲自培训访问后获得SI单位。自我保健干预措施的成功,包括SI的选择,取决于当地政策和个人提供者创造一个有利的环境。因此,我们的目的是1)评估提供者对卫生部协议的忠诚度;2)评估保真度偏差的程度;3)评估以客户为中心。方法:8名神秘客户演员扮演一个年长的已婚女性或一个年轻的未婚女性,没有DMPA-SC经历。他们在30个公共和30个私人机构寻求避孕,包括为SI提供DMPA-SC。总共计划了120次互动(每个设施两次-每个剖面一次)。在他们的互动之后,演员们立即完成了一份关于他们经历的汇报调查。利用这些汇报调查的反馈,我们描述了关键行为者报告的结果(提供者对卫生部关于SI分配、SI培训和支持避孕决策的协议的忠诚)。我们还检查了客观和主观的以客户为中心的结果。我们通过双变量检验来评估保真度和以客户为中心的偏倚,以确定行动者概况(年轻/未婚vs年长/已婚)和设施类型(卫生设施vs药房/PPMV)的差异。结果:对配药指南的忠实度(即拒绝DMPA-SC单位用于SI)因设施类型而异(χ2 = 12.4, p值2 = 9.9,p值= 0.007)。研究发现,以客户为中心的结果(例如,被问及是否因年龄和婚姻状况而受到不同对待)因演员概况而异。描述性地说,与年长的已婚演员相比,更多年轻的未婚演员报告了这些结果。结论:为SI分配DMPA-SC的意愿因设施类型而异,但与客户概况无关。然而,年轻的、未婚的演员经历了更多来自供应商的审查。这些发现表明,需要澄清服务提供协议,以确保妇女获得和使用自我注射避孕药具的有利环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信