In vitro activity of Eravacycline against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli and associated risk factors for non-susceptible infections from a tertiary hospital in fujian, China from 2021 to 2024.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Xuyang Li, Pengfei Gao, Meiyun Chen, Bin Li, Xiaohong Xu
{"title":"In vitro activity of Eravacycline against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli and associated risk factors for non-susceptible infections from a tertiary hospital in fujian, China from 2021 to 2024.","authors":"Xuyang Li, Pengfei Gao, Meiyun Chen, Bin Li, Xiaohong Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-04331-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated Eravacycline (ERV)'s effectiveness against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) and identified risk factors for ERV non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (ENSKP) infections to support clinical treatment and early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2021 and 2024, 235 Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii(CRAB) strains, 48 Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli (CRECO) strains, and 158 Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) strains were collected. Resistance genes were identified using PCR, and the minimum inhibitory concentration of tigecycline and ERV was determined using the broth microdilution method. Susceptibility was assessed according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and EUCAST breakpoints, and logistic regression identified ENSKP infection risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For CRAB, ERV's MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.5 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml, while tigecycline's were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml. For Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), ERV's MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.5 µg/ml and 2 µg/ml, and tigecycline's were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml. For CRECO, both ERV and tigecycline had MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.25 µg/ml and 0.5 µg/ml. The study found 25 KP strains non-susceptible to ERV, with no prior ERV treatment. The ENSKP group had higher ECOG scores, more invasive procedures, more antibacterial drug use, and longer hospital stays compared to the ERV susceptible KP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that ERV effectively combats CRGNB, providing a potential basis for future treatment of drug-resistant infections. ENSKP infection can occur without ERV use. Effective surveillance and antibiotic stewardship are essential for managing ENSKP in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04331-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated Eravacycline (ERV)'s effectiveness against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) and identified risk factors for ERV non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (ENSKP) infections to support clinical treatment and early detection.

Methods: Between 2021 and 2024, 235 Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii(CRAB) strains, 48 Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli (CRECO) strains, and 158 Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) strains were collected. Resistance genes were identified using PCR, and the minimum inhibitory concentration of tigecycline and ERV was determined using the broth microdilution method. Susceptibility was assessed according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and EUCAST breakpoints, and logistic regression identified ENSKP infection risk factors.

Results: For CRAB, ERV's MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.5 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml, while tigecycline's were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml. For Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), ERV's MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.5 µg/ml and 2 µg/ml, and tigecycline's were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml. For CRECO, both ERV and tigecycline had MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.25 µg/ml and 0.5 µg/ml. The study found 25 KP strains non-susceptible to ERV, with no prior ERV treatment. The ENSKP group had higher ECOG scores, more invasive procedures, more antibacterial drug use, and longer hospital stays compared to the ERV susceptible KP.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that ERV effectively combats CRGNB, providing a potential basis for future treatment of drug-resistant infections. ENSKP infection can occur without ERV use. Effective surveillance and antibiotic stewardship are essential for managing ENSKP in high-risk patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2021 - 2024年福建省某三级医院依拉瓦环素对碳青霉烯耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌体外活性及非易感感染危险因素的研究
背景:本研究评估了Eravacycline (ERV)对碳青霉烯耐药革兰氏阴性菌(CRGNB)的有效性,并确定了ERV不敏感肺炎克雷伯菌(ENSKP)感染的危险因素,以支持临床治疗和早期发现。方法:2021 ~ 2024年共收集耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB) 235株、耐碳青霉烯大肠埃希菌(CRECO) 48株、肺炎克雷伯菌(KP) 158株。采用PCR法鉴定耐药基因,采用微量肉汤稀释法测定替加环素和ERV的最低抑菌浓度。根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和EUCAST断点评估易感性,并通过logistic回归确定ENSKP感染的危险因素。结果:对于CRAB, ERV的MIC50和MIC90分别为0.5µg/ml和1µg/ml,替加环素的MIC50和MIC90分别为2µg/ml和4µg/ml。耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP) ERV MIC50和MIC90分别为0.5µg/ml和2µg/ml,替加环素的MIC50和MIC90分别为2µg/ml和4µg/ml。对于CRECO, ERV和替加环素的MIC50和MIC90分别为0.25µg/ml和0.5µg/ml。该研究发现25株KP菌株对ERV不敏感,之前没有接受过ERV治疗。与ERV易感KP相比,ENSKP组ECOG评分更高,有更多的侵入性手术,更多的抗菌药物使用,更长的住院时间。结论:我们的研究表明ERV能有效对抗CRGNB,为未来耐药感染的治疗提供了潜在的基础。ENSKP感染可以在不使用ERV的情况下发生。有效的监测和抗生素管理对于高危患者ENSKP的管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信