Identification of hotspots of crop wild relatives in Germany to promote their in situ conservation in a network of genetic reserves.

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Maria Bönisch, Vera Senße, Thomas Engst, Alica Sander, Diethart Matthies, Eckhard Jedicke, Nadine Bernhardt
{"title":"Identification of hotspots of crop wild relatives in Germany to promote their in situ conservation in a network of genetic reserves.","authors":"Maria Bönisch, Vera Senße, Thomas Engst, Alica Sander, Diethart Matthies, Eckhard Jedicke, Nadine Bernhardt","doi":"10.1186/s40529-025-00473-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crop wild relatives (CWR) represent a valuable resource for ensuring food security. Although they are negatively affected by the loss of habitats due to climate change and land use change, they are underrepresented in conservation programmes. The establishment of genetic reserve (GR) networks has been put forward as an approach to protect CWR. The objective of this study was to identify CWR hotspots in Germany, which are suitable candidates for the establishment of GRs. CWR observation data were collected on a national scale from various sources and a hotspot analysis was performed to identify potential GR sites. A number of these sites were visited and the plant species occurring were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 GR candidate sites were identified. The sites are distributed across the biogeographic regions of Germany and could conserve 73% of all CWR and 85% of the CWR that were assigned a conservation priority for Germany. Our on-site surveys for 27 GR candidates found discrepancies between the species records available and the species currently occurring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose five hectares as an appropriate size for GRs, as such an area can be monitored and the number of stakeholders involved is usually low. The discrepancies concerning species records highlight the need for more frequent, regular nationwide CWR monitoring as a prerequisite for their conservation. Our results further suggest that GRs should also be set up outside of protected areas to protect CWR efficiently.</p>","PeriodicalId":9185,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Studies","volume":"66 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-025-00473-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Crop wild relatives (CWR) represent a valuable resource for ensuring food security. Although they are negatively affected by the loss of habitats due to climate change and land use change, they are underrepresented in conservation programmes. The establishment of genetic reserve (GR) networks has been put forward as an approach to protect CWR. The objective of this study was to identify CWR hotspots in Germany, which are suitable candidates for the establishment of GRs. CWR observation data were collected on a national scale from various sources and a hotspot analysis was performed to identify potential GR sites. A number of these sites were visited and the plant species occurring were recorded.

Results: 76 GR candidate sites were identified. The sites are distributed across the biogeographic regions of Germany and could conserve 73% of all CWR and 85% of the CWR that were assigned a conservation priority for Germany. Our on-site surveys for 27 GR candidates found discrepancies between the species records available and the species currently occurring.

Conclusions: We propose five hectares as an appropriate size for GRs, as such an area can be monitored and the number of stakeholders involved is usually low. The discrepancies concerning species records highlight the need for more frequent, regular nationwide CWR monitoring as a prerequisite for their conservation. Our results further suggest that GRs should also be set up outside of protected areas to protect CWR efficiently.

确定德国作物野生近缘种质资源热点,促进其在遗传保护网络中的原位保护。
背景:作物野生近缘种(CWR)是保障粮食安全的宝贵资源。虽然它们受到气候变化和土地利用变化造成的栖息地丧失的负面影响,但它们在保护方案中的代表性不足。建立遗传保护区(GR)网络是保护CWR的有效途径。本研究的目的是确定德国的CWR热点,这些热点是建立GRs的合适候选者。在全国范围内收集了不同来源的CWR观测数据,并进行了热点分析,以确定潜在的GR站点。对其中一些地点进行了考察,并记录了发生的植物种类。结果:共鉴定出76个GR候选位点。这些地点分布在德国的生物地理区域,可以保护73%的CWR和85%的德国优先保护的CWR。我们对27个候选物种进行了现场调查,发现现有物种记录与目前发生的物种之间存在差异。结论:我们建议5公顷作为GRs的合适规模,因为这样的面积可以监测,而且涉及的利益相关者数量通常很低。有关物种记录的差异突出了需要更频繁,定期的全国范围内的CWR监测,作为保护它们的先决条件。我们的研究结果进一步表明,为了有效地保护CWR,还应在保护区外建立GRs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Botanical Studies
Botanical Studies 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: Botanical Studies is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of botany, including but not limited to taxonomy, morphology, development, genetics, evolution, reproduction, systematics, and biodiversity of all plant groups, algae, and fungi. The journal is affiliated with the Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信