Associations between dietary index for gut microbiota with COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality: insights from the 1999-2018 NHANES data.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Xiaopeng Liu, Zhixiong Hu, Qi Zhang
{"title":"Associations between dietary index for gut microbiota with COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality: insights from the 1999-2018 NHANES data.","authors":"Xiaopeng Liu, Zhixiong Hu, Qi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03908-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gut microbiota dysbiosis plays a vital role the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) examine the cross-sectional association between dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM), a novel biomarker reflecting gut microbiota composition and function, and COPD prevalence; and (2) assess the prognostic significance of DI-GM score for all-cause mortality in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. DI-GM score was calculated from 24-hour dietary recall. Primary outcomes were COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between DI-GM and COPD prevalence, while Cox proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of COPD was 6.87% among the 22,859 participants included. Compared to participants with DI-GM score of 0-3, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for DI-GM score of 4, 5, and ≥ 6 were 0.88 (0.70-1.11), 0.78 (0.64-0.97), and 0.75 (0.62-0.90), respectively. During a median follow-up time of 84 months, a total of 570 (28.15%) participants died among the 1,580 COPD participants. Compared to DI-GM score of 0-3, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for DI-GM score of 4, 5, and ≥ 6 were 0.78 (0.60-1.01), 0.63 (0.47-0.83), and 0.69 (0.56-0.85), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher DI-GM scores are significantly associated with both reduced COPD prevalence and improved survival in COPD patients. Our results suggest dietary modifications targeting gut microbiota may represent a novel strategy for COPD prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03908-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gut microbiota dysbiosis plays a vital role the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) examine the cross-sectional association between dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM), a novel biomarker reflecting gut microbiota composition and function, and COPD prevalence; and (2) assess the prognostic significance of DI-GM score for all-cause mortality in COPD patients.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. DI-GM score was calculated from 24-hour dietary recall. Primary outcomes were COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between DI-GM and COPD prevalence, while Cox proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients.

Results: The prevalence of COPD was 6.87% among the 22,859 participants included. Compared to participants with DI-GM score of 0-3, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for DI-GM score of 4, 5, and ≥ 6 were 0.88 (0.70-1.11), 0.78 (0.64-0.97), and 0.75 (0.62-0.90), respectively. During a median follow-up time of 84 months, a total of 570 (28.15%) participants died among the 1,580 COPD participants. Compared to DI-GM score of 0-3, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for DI-GM score of 4, 5, and ≥ 6 were 0.78 (0.60-1.01), 0.63 (0.47-0.83), and 0.69 (0.56-0.85), respectively.

Conclusion: Higher DI-GM scores are significantly associated with both reduced COPD prevalence and improved survival in COPD patients. Our results suggest dietary modifications targeting gut microbiota may represent a novel strategy for COPD prevention and management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肠道微生物群饮食指数与COPD患病率和全因死亡率之间的关系:来自1999-2018年NHANES数据的见解
目的:肠道菌群失调在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)发病机制中起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在:(1)研究反映肠道微生物群组成和功能的新型生物标志物肠道微生物群膳食指数(DI-GM)与COPD患病率之间的横断面相关性;(2)评估DI-GM评分对COPD患者全因死亡率的预后意义。方法:分析1999-2018年全国健康与营养调查数据。DI-GM评分根据24小时饮食回忆计算。主要结局是COPD患者的COPD患病率和全因死亡风险。多变量logistic回归评估了DI-GM与COPD患病率之间的关系,Cox比例风险模型评估了COPD患者的全因死亡风险。结果:在纳入的22,859名参与者中,COPD患病率为6.87%。与DI-GM评分为0-3的受试者相比,DI-GM评分为4、5和≥6的比值比(95%置信区间)分别为0.88(0.70-1.11)、0.78(0.64-0.97)和0.75(0.62-0.90)。在84个月的中位随访期间,1580名COPD参与者中共有570人(28.15%)死亡。与DI-GM评分0-3分相比,DI-GM评分4、5和≥6分的风险比(95%可信区间)分别为0.78(0.60-1.01)、0.63(0.47-0.83)和0.69(0.56-0.85)。结论:较高的DI-GM评分与COPD患者COPD患病率降低和生存率提高显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,针对肠道微生物群的饮食调整可能代表了COPD预防和管理的新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信