Evaluation of patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in terms of treatment compliance and quality of life after follow-up with telemedicine: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Zeynep Sena Dogan, Nurdan Kokturk
{"title":"Evaluation of patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in terms of treatment compliance and quality of life after follow-up with telemedicine: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Zeynep Sena Dogan, Nurdan Kokturk","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03854-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has emerged as an important alternative method. The investigation of the safety and effectiveness of telemedicine in the post-exacerbation follow-up of advanced-stage COPD patients and determining whether telemedicine-mediated healthcare service resulted in any differences in COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, inhaler treatment adherence, and technique compared to the face-to-face healthcare service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, method-based clinical research study. Patients who were hospitalized due to COPD exacerbation were included in the present study. The sealed envelope randomization method was adopted to divide these patients into 2 groups: the \"telemedicine group\" and the \"control group\". Both groups were then followed up for 3 months. The 0th visit was considered the initial visit, which was followed by the 1st visit on Day 10 post-initiation, the 2nd visit at 1 month, and the 3rd visit at 3 months, all assessed via teleconsultations. The COPD assessment questionnaire (CAT) scores, inhaler treatment adherence, and technique were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences existed between the two groups in terms of demographic data and disease characteristics at baseline assessment. At the end of 3 months, the CAT score was 9 (0-30) in the telemedicine group and 18 (0-34) in the control group (p = 0.019). The inhaler treatment technique was correct in 32 patients (91.4%) in the telemedicine group and 23 patients (65.7%) in the control group (p = 0.02). Inhaler treatment adherence was observed in 70.6% of the patients in the telemedicine group and 55.9% of the patients in the control group at the 3-month time point (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine has improved the quality of life of advanced-stage COPD patients and their inhaler techniques. It may, therefore, be considered a promising alternative to traditional face-to-face follow-ups, although various technical infrastructures and legal regulations are necessary.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06477328, Registration Date: 21.06.2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03854-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has emerged as an important alternative method. The investigation of the safety and effectiveness of telemedicine in the post-exacerbation follow-up of advanced-stage COPD patients and determining whether telemedicine-mediated healthcare service resulted in any differences in COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, inhaler treatment adherence, and technique compared to the face-to-face healthcare service.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, method-based clinical research study. Patients who were hospitalized due to COPD exacerbation were included in the present study. The sealed envelope randomization method was adopted to divide these patients into 2 groups: the "telemedicine group" and the "control group". Both groups were then followed up for 3 months. The 0th visit was considered the initial visit, which was followed by the 1st visit on Day 10 post-initiation, the 2nd visit at 1 month, and the 3rd visit at 3 months, all assessed via teleconsultations. The COPD assessment questionnaire (CAT) scores, inhaler treatment adherence, and technique were compared between the groups.

Results: No significant differences existed between the two groups in terms of demographic data and disease characteristics at baseline assessment. At the end of 3 months, the CAT score was 9 (0-30) in the telemedicine group and 18 (0-34) in the control group (p = 0.019). The inhaler treatment technique was correct in 32 patients (91.4%) in the telemedicine group and 23 patients (65.7%) in the control group (p = 0.02). Inhaler treatment adherence was observed in 70.6% of the patients in the telemedicine group and 55.9% of the patients in the control group at the 3-month time point (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Telemedicine has improved the quality of life of advanced-stage COPD patients and their inhaler techniques. It may, therefore, be considered a promising alternative to traditional face-to-face follow-ups, although various technical infrastructures and legal regulations are necessary.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06477328, Registration Date: 21.06.2024.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

远程医疗随访后慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者治疗依从性和生活质量的评价:一项随机对照试验
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程医疗已成为一种重要的替代方法。研究远程医疗在晚期COPD患者急性加重后随访中的安全性和有效性,并确定远程医疗介导的医疗服务与面对面医疗服务相比,是否会导致COPD评估测试(CAT)评分、吸入器治疗依从性和技术方面的差异。方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、基于方法的临床研究。因COPD加重而住院的患者被纳入本研究。采用密封信封随机化方法将患者分为“远程医疗组”和“对照组”2组。两组均随访3个月。第0次访问被认为是首次访问,随后在启动后第10天进行第一次访问,在1个月时进行第二次访问,在3个月时进行第3次访问,所有访问都通过远程咨询进行评估。比较两组间COPD评估问卷(CAT)评分、吸入器治疗依从性和技术。结果:在基线评估时,两组在人口学数据和疾病特征方面没有显著差异。3个月时,远程医疗组CAT评分为9分(0 ~ 30分),对照组为18分(0 ~ 34分),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.019)。远程医疗组32例(91.4%)、对照组23例(65.7%)患者的吸入器治疗技术正确(p = 0.02)。远程医疗组患者在3个月时间点吸入器治疗依从率为70.6%,对照组为55.9% (p < 0.05)。结论:远程医疗改善了晚期COPD患者及其吸入器技术的生活质量。因此,它可以被认为是传统的面对面后续行动的一个有希望的替代办法,尽管需要各种技术基础设施和法律条例。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06477328,注册日期:21.06.2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信