Doula Support and Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anika Heuberger, Gabrielle Ramos, Wasana Weerasuriya, Noralbis Barrientos, Janelle Applequist, Adetola F Louis-Jacques
{"title":"Doula Support and Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anika Heuberger, Gabrielle Ramos, Wasana Weerasuriya, Noralbis Barrientos, Janelle Applequist, Adetola F Louis-Jacques","doi":"10.1177/15568253251367430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Breastfeeding is considered the ideal source of infant nutrition and has been shown to enhance maternal-infant health, but most women do not achieve their breastfeeding goals. Significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in breastfeeding outcomes. While current literature indicates a positive association between doula support and breastfeeding, the specific breastfeeding outcomes impacted by doulas remain unclear. Our objective was to synthesize existing literature on breastfeeding outcomes when doulas are utilized. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Electronic searches were conducted in February 2022 and updated in April 2024 to include primary studies that examined doula support and breastfeeding outcomes (intention, initiation, duration, exclusivity, support, knowledge, education). Studies were excluded if they were secondary research or outside the perinatal period (pregnancy, childbirth, and/or up to 1 year postpartum). Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, and risk of bias was assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,917 deduplicated studies were screened, and 32 were included. Twenty-two studies were quantitative, and 10 studies were qualitative or mixed methods. Most studies (<i>n</i> = 24) consisted of birthing populations that experience marginalization, such as adolescents, low-income status, and racially/ethnically minoritized groups. Although doula support was associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes overall, there were mixed findings regarding breastfeeding duration and exclusivity. Lactating clients found doulas to be an important source of breastfeeding support, education, and knowledge. However, doulas reported a need for increased breastfeeding education during their training. Health care providers had limited knowledge of doulas' role in promoting breastfeeding. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Doulas are associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes. Increased breastfeeding education in doula training and greater inclusion and awareness of doulas among the health care team could maximize this benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253251367430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breastfeeding is considered the ideal source of infant nutrition and has been shown to enhance maternal-infant health, but most women do not achieve their breastfeeding goals. Significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in breastfeeding outcomes. While current literature indicates a positive association between doula support and breastfeeding, the specific breastfeeding outcomes impacted by doulas remain unclear. Our objective was to synthesize existing literature on breastfeeding outcomes when doulas are utilized. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in February 2022 and updated in April 2024 to include primary studies that examined doula support and breastfeeding outcomes (intention, initiation, duration, exclusivity, support, knowledge, education). Studies were excluded if they were secondary research or outside the perinatal period (pregnancy, childbirth, and/or up to 1 year postpartum). Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, and risk of bias was assessed. Results: A total of 1,917 deduplicated studies were screened, and 32 were included. Twenty-two studies were quantitative, and 10 studies were qualitative or mixed methods. Most studies (n = 24) consisted of birthing populations that experience marginalization, such as adolescents, low-income status, and racially/ethnically minoritized groups. Although doula support was associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes overall, there were mixed findings regarding breastfeeding duration and exclusivity. Lactating clients found doulas to be an important source of breastfeeding support, education, and knowledge. However, doulas reported a need for increased breastfeeding education during their training. Health care providers had limited knowledge of doulas' role in promoting breastfeeding. Conclusion: Doulas are associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes. Increased breastfeeding education in doula training and greater inclusion and awareness of doulas among the health care team could maximize this benefit.

导乐支持和母乳喂养结果:一项系统综述。
导言:母乳喂养被认为是婴儿营养的理想来源,并已被证明可以增强母婴健康,但大多数妇女没有实现母乳喂养的目标。母乳喂养结果存在显著的种族、民族和社会经济差异。虽然目前的文献表明助产师支持与母乳喂养之间存在正相关,但助产师对母乳喂养结果的具体影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是综合现有的关于使用助产师时母乳喂养结果的文献。方法:电子检索于2022年2月进行,并于2024年4月更新,包括检查导乐支持和母乳喂养结果(意图、开始、持续时间、排他性、支持、知识、教育)的初步研究。次要研究或围产期(妊娠、分娩和/或产后1年以内)以外的研究被排除。对数据进行提取和综合,并评估偏倚风险。结果:共筛选了1,917项去重复研究,其中32项被纳入。22项研究为定量方法,10项研究为定性或混合方法。大多数研究(n = 24)包括经历边缘化的生育人群,如青少年、低收入群体和种族/民族少数群体。尽管助产师的支持与改善母乳喂养的总体结果有关,但在母乳喂养的持续时间和排他性方面,结果好坏参半。哺乳期客户发现助产师是母乳喂养支持、教育和知识的重要来源。然而,助产师报告说,在培训期间需要加强母乳喂养教育。卫生保健提供者对助产师在促进母乳喂养方面的作用了解有限。结论:助产师与改善母乳喂养结果有关。在助产师培训中加强母乳喂养教育,在保健团队中加强对助产师的包容和认识,可以最大限度地提高这一效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信