Trends and patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients in Jordan: a decade comparison.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Nedal Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad Alqudimat, Ibrahim Alananzeh, Nour Kasasbeh, Khawlah Ammar, Amal Al-Omari
{"title":"Trends and patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients in Jordan: a decade comparison.","authors":"Nedal Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad Alqudimat, Ibrahim Alananzeh, Nour Kasasbeh, Khawlah Ammar, Amal Al-Omari","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-05065-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompasses healthcare practices beyond conventional medical care. Despite advancements in oncology treatment, CAM use remains prevalent among patients with cancer. In Jordan, while CAM usage is common, particularly involving herbalists and spiritual healers, data on its patterns among patients with cancer are limited. This study compared CAM use among cancer patients in Jordan between 2013 and 2022, aiming to identify changing trends, associated factors, and implications for clinical practice and patient education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was administered to adult cancer patients in Jordan in 2013 and 2022. In 2013, participants were recruited from four facilities, including the King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), whereas in 2022, recruitment was exclusively at KHCC. Patients completed a validated semi-structured questionnaire covering sociodemographic information, CAM usage patterns, communication with healthcare providers, and perceptions of CAM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of CAM use has decreased from 49.4% (n = 400) in 2013 to 32.8% (n = 124) in 2022. Natural health products such as herbs, vitamins, and special foods remained the most commonly used CAM therapies in both surveys. Despite the overall decrease in CAM usage, the frequency among users increased, with daily use reported by 65.9% in 2022 compared to 55.3% in 2013. The perceived benefits of CAM have significantly declined from 86.6% in 2013 to 31.9% in 2022. Communication about CAM use with healthcare providers remains low, although it slightly improves from 35.2% in 2013 to 46.3% in 2022. In 2013, younger age at diagnosis and treatment completion were independently associated with higher CAM use. In contrast, 2022 data identified lack of health insurance as the sole independent predictor of CAM use (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 1.820, 95% CI: 1.007-3.289).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the past decade, CAM use among Jordanian patients with cancer has significantly decreased, although current users engage more intensively. The decline in perceived benefits and the persistent communication gap with healthcare providers underscores the necessity for educational programs targeting both patients and clinicians. Such interventions could enhance dialogue regarding CAM, ensure safer integration with conventional treatments, and potentially improve patient outcomes by preventing harmful interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-05065-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompasses healthcare practices beyond conventional medical care. Despite advancements in oncology treatment, CAM use remains prevalent among patients with cancer. In Jordan, while CAM usage is common, particularly involving herbalists and spiritual healers, data on its patterns among patients with cancer are limited. This study compared CAM use among cancer patients in Jordan between 2013 and 2022, aiming to identify changing trends, associated factors, and implications for clinical practice and patient education.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to adult cancer patients in Jordan in 2013 and 2022. In 2013, participants were recruited from four facilities, including the King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), whereas in 2022, recruitment was exclusively at KHCC. Patients completed a validated semi-structured questionnaire covering sociodemographic information, CAM usage patterns, communication with healthcare providers, and perceptions of CAM.

Results: The prevalence of CAM use has decreased from 49.4% (n = 400) in 2013 to 32.8% (n = 124) in 2022. Natural health products such as herbs, vitamins, and special foods remained the most commonly used CAM therapies in both surveys. Despite the overall decrease in CAM usage, the frequency among users increased, with daily use reported by 65.9% in 2022 compared to 55.3% in 2013. The perceived benefits of CAM have significantly declined from 86.6% in 2013 to 31.9% in 2022. Communication about CAM use with healthcare providers remains low, although it slightly improves from 35.2% in 2013 to 46.3% in 2022. In 2013, younger age at diagnosis and treatment completion were independently associated with higher CAM use. In contrast, 2022 data identified lack of health insurance as the sole independent predictor of CAM use (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 1.820, 95% CI: 1.007-3.289).

Conclusion: Over the past decade, CAM use among Jordanian patients with cancer has significantly decreased, although current users engage more intensively. The decline in perceived benefits and the persistent communication gap with healthcare providers underscores the necessity for educational programs targeting both patients and clinicians. Such interventions could enhance dialogue regarding CAM, ensure safer integration with conventional treatments, and potentially improve patient outcomes by preventing harmful interactions.

约旦癌症患者使用补充和替代药物的趋势和模式:十年比较。
背景:补充和替代医学(CAM)涵盖了传统医疗保健之外的医疗保健实践。尽管肿瘤治疗取得了进步,但辅助化疗在癌症患者中仍然普遍使用。在约旦,虽然CAM的使用很普遍,特别是草药医生和精神治疗师,但癌症患者的使用模式数据有限。本研究比较了2013年至2022年约旦癌症患者的CAM使用情况,旨在确定变化趋势、相关因素以及对临床实践和患者教育的影响。方法:对2013年和2022年约旦成年癌症患者进行横断面调查。2013年,参与者从四个机构招募,包括侯赛因国王癌症中心(KHCC),而在2022年,招募只在KHCC。患者完成了一份经过验证的半结构化问卷,其中包括社会人口统计信息、辅助医疗工具的使用模式、与医疗保健提供者的沟通以及对辅助医疗工具的看法。结果:CAM使用率从2013年的49.4% (n = 400)下降到2022年的32.8% (n = 124)。在这两项调查中,草药、维生素和特殊食品等天然保健品仍然是最常用的辅助生殖疗法。尽管CAM的使用总体上有所下降,但用户的使用频率有所增加,2022年的日使用量为65.9%,而2013年为55.3%。CAM的预期收益从2013年的86.6%大幅下降到2022年的31.9%。医疗保健提供者关于辅助医学使用的沟通仍然很低,尽管从2013年的35.2%略微提高到2022年的46.3%。2013年,诊断和完成治疗时的年龄越小与辅助治疗药物的使用越高独立相关。相比之下,2022年的数据表明,缺乏健康保险是CAM使用的唯一独立预测因素(调整优势比= 1.820,95% CI: 1.007-3.289)。结论:在过去的十年中,约旦癌症患者中CAM的使用显著减少,尽管目前的使用者使用频率更高。感知收益的下降和与医疗保健提供者持续的沟通差距强调了针对患者和临床医生的教育计划的必要性。这些干预措施可以加强关于辅助农业生产的对话,确保与传统治疗更安全的结合,并可能通过防止有害的相互作用来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信