Automated quantification of abdominal aortic calcification using 3D nnU-Net: a novel approach to assess AAA rupture risk.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuan-Lin Luo, Yi-Fan Liu, Zhi Huang, Chu Wang, Ling-Yue Zhang, Shui-Chuan Huang
{"title":"Automated quantification of abdominal aortic calcification using 3D nnU-Net: a novel approach to assess AAA rupture risk.","authors":"Yuan-Lin Luo, Yi-Fan Liu, Zhi Huang, Chu Wang, Ling-Yue Zhang, Shui-Chuan Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01911-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) pose a serious rupture risk, heightened by aortic calcification. Traditional calcification scoring methods are slow and require expertise. This study aims to construct a convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) model for automatic quantification and segmentation of abdominal aortic calcification from a single CTA scan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent abdominal aortic CTA between January 2018 and October 2023, meeting specific inclusion criteria. Vessel and calcification segmentation were manually scored by two physicians, and an nnU-Net deep learning model was developed to automate calcification measurement. Model performance was assessed using Dice scores. Agreement between manual and model-based scoring was assessed using Spearman rank correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nnU-Net model achieved median Dice scores of 93.60% for blood vessels and 81.06% for calcification. Average Dice scores were 92.37 ± 4.87% for blood vessel segmentation and 81.03 ± 5.11% for calcified plaque. The model's Agatston scores correlated closely with manual scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.969), with a mean difference of -229.51 (95% limits of agreement: -6003.92 to 5544.90). The model's evaluation time was also shorter than manual scoring (112 ± 4.4 s vs. 3796 ± 6.6 s, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nnU-Net-based model shows potential as an automated tool for accurately segmenting and quantifying abdominal aortic calcification, offering comparable results to manual scoring with significantly reduced evaluation time. This approach may assist in more efficient assessment of AAA rupture risk, supporting clinical decision-making in patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01911-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) pose a serious rupture risk, heightened by aortic calcification. Traditional calcification scoring methods are slow and require expertise. This study aims to construct a convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) model for automatic quantification and segmentation of abdominal aortic calcification from a single CTA scan.

Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent abdominal aortic CTA between January 2018 and October 2023, meeting specific inclusion criteria. Vessel and calcification segmentation were manually scored by two physicians, and an nnU-Net deep learning model was developed to automate calcification measurement. Model performance was assessed using Dice scores. Agreement between manual and model-based scoring was assessed using Spearman rank correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The nnU-Net model achieved median Dice scores of 93.60% for blood vessels and 81.06% for calcification. Average Dice scores were 92.37 ± 4.87% for blood vessel segmentation and 81.03 ± 5.11% for calcified plaque. The model's Agatston scores correlated closely with manual scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.969), with a mean difference of -229.51 (95% limits of agreement: -6003.92 to 5544.90). The model's evaluation time was also shorter than manual scoring (112 ± 4.4 s vs. 3796 ± 6.6 s, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The nnU-Net-based model shows potential as an automated tool for accurately segmenting and quantifying abdominal aortic calcification, offering comparable results to manual scoring with significantly reduced evaluation time. This approach may assist in more efficient assessment of AAA rupture risk, supporting clinical decision-making in patient management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用3D nnU-Net自动量化腹主动脉钙化:评估AAA破裂风险的新方法。
背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)具有严重的破裂风险,并因主动脉钙化而加剧。传统的钙化评分方法速度慢,需要专业知识。本研究旨在建立一个卷积神经网络(nnU-Net)模型,用于从单次CTA扫描中自动量化和分割腹主动脉钙化。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2018年1月至2023年10月期间接受腹主动脉CTA治疗的100例患者,符合特定的纳入标准。血管和钙化分割由两位医生手工评分,并开发了一个nnU-Net深度学习模型来自动测量钙化。使用Dice分数评估模型性能。使用Spearman秩相关和Bland-Altman分析评估手工评分和基于模型评分之间的一致性。结果:nnU-Net模型对血管和钙化的中位Dice评分分别为93.60%和81.06%。血管分割的平均评分为92.37±4.87%,钙化斑块的平均评分为81.03±5.11%。模型的Agatston评分与人工评分密切相关(Spearman's ρ = 0.969),平均差为-229.51(95%一致性限:-6003.92至5544.90)。该模型的评估时间也短于人工评分(112±4.4秒vs. 3796±6.6秒)。结论:基于nnu - net的模型显示出作为准确分割和量化腹主动脉钙化的自动化工具的潜力,其结果与人工评分相当,且评估时间显著缩短。这种方法有助于更有效地评估AAA破裂风险,支持患者管理的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信