A novel methodology for measuring global diaphragm thickness by ultrasonography in patients with critical illness: an exploratory pilot study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chen-Liang Sun, Si-Ping Zhou, Li-Sha Hou, Meng-Jie Zhan, Yi-Ping Wang, Hong-Sheng Zhao, Feng-Mei Guo, Guang-Quan Zhou
{"title":"A novel methodology for measuring global diaphragm thickness by ultrasonography in patients with critical illness: an exploratory pilot study.","authors":"Chen-Liang Sun, Si-Ping Zhou, Li-Sha Hou, Meng-Jie Zhan, Yi-Ping Wang, Hong-Sheng Zhao, Feng-Mei Guo, Guang-Quan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01875-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A global diaphragm thickness measurement technique was developed for the zone of apposition (ZOA) using an image edge identification approach. The method was assessed in terms of its repeatability and reliability when applied in patients with critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diaphragm thickness measurements were conducted by experienced ultrasound examiners in 60 critically ill adult patients. The performance of continuous global diaphragm thickness measurements was compared to traditional localized diaphragm thickness measurements with regard to intra-observer and inter-observer consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>End-expiratory diaphragm thickness was measured to assess consistency. For the traditional local diaphragm thickness measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.882 for intra-observer and 0.848 for inter-observer assessments (p < 0.001). The global diaphragm thickness measurements yielded ICC values of 0.968 and 0.955 for intra-observer and inter-observer assessments, respectively (p < 0.001). These findings indicated good reliability for the conventional method and excellent reliability for the global measurement method. The maximum observed variability was 16.5% with the traditional method and 3.9% with the continuous measurement approach. When using a 10% decrease in diaphragm thickness as the threshold for clinically relevant diaphragmatic atrophy, 16.7% of measurements obtained through the traditional method exceeded this error margin, whereas all measurements acquired through the continuous method remained within the acceptable range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to traditional localized diaphragm thickness ultrasonography, the continuous approach demonstrated superior repeatability and reliability. This newly developed methodology may enhance the precision of diaphragm thickness evaluations within the ZOA in patients with critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01875-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A global diaphragm thickness measurement technique was developed for the zone of apposition (ZOA) using an image edge identification approach. The method was assessed in terms of its repeatability and reliability when applied in patients with critical illness.

Methods: Diaphragm thickness measurements were conducted by experienced ultrasound examiners in 60 critically ill adult patients. The performance of continuous global diaphragm thickness measurements was compared to traditional localized diaphragm thickness measurements with regard to intra-observer and inter-observer consistency.

Results: End-expiratory diaphragm thickness was measured to assess consistency. For the traditional local diaphragm thickness measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.882 for intra-observer and 0.848 for inter-observer assessments (p < 0.001). The global diaphragm thickness measurements yielded ICC values of 0.968 and 0.955 for intra-observer and inter-observer assessments, respectively (p < 0.001). These findings indicated good reliability for the conventional method and excellent reliability for the global measurement method. The maximum observed variability was 16.5% with the traditional method and 3.9% with the continuous measurement approach. When using a 10% decrease in diaphragm thickness as the threshold for clinically relevant diaphragmatic atrophy, 16.7% of measurements obtained through the traditional method exceeded this error margin, whereas all measurements acquired through the continuous method remained within the acceptable range.

Conclusions: Compared to traditional localized diaphragm thickness ultrasonography, the continuous approach demonstrated superior repeatability and reliability. This newly developed methodology may enhance the precision of diaphragm thickness evaluations within the ZOA in patients with critical illness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新的方法,测量全球隔膜厚度的超声检查危重病人:探索性试点研究。
背景:利用图像边缘识别的方法,开发了一种针对相对区域(ZOA)的全局膜片厚度测量技术。评估了该方法在危重患者中应用的可重复性和可靠性。方法:对60例危重成人患者进行超声测量。在观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性方面,比较了连续的全局隔膜厚度测量与传统的局部隔膜厚度测量的性能。结果:测量呼气末膈膜厚度以评估一致性。对于传统的局部隔膜厚度测量,观察者内的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.882,观察者间的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.848。(p)结论:与传统的局部隔膜厚度超声检查相比,连续方法具有更高的重复性和可靠性。这种新开发的方法可以提高在ZOA中对危重疾病患者的隔膜厚度评估的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信