Comparative study of 18F-labeled PET radiopharmaceuticals in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Bok-Nam Park, Su-Min Kim, Young-Sil An
{"title":"Comparative study of <sup>18</sup>F-labeled PET radiopharmaceuticals in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.","authors":"Bok-Nam Park, Su-Min Kim, Young-Sil An","doi":"10.1186/s12868-025-00978-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is the leading cause of dementia, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and significant social and economic burdens. Despite extensive research into amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals, the effectiveness of various <sup>18</sup>F-labeled tracers for imaging amyloid plaques in AD mouse models remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of three radiopharmaceuticals-<sup>18</sup>F-florbetaben (FBB), <sup>18</sup>F-flutemetamol (FMM), and <sup>18</sup>F-florapronol (FPN)-in differentiating amyloid deposition in AD and control mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FMM and <sup>18</sup>F-FBB demonstrated significantly higher standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in AD mice than in controls. For <sup>18</sup>F-FBB, the mean SUVR in AD mice was 1.06, significantly higher than the 0.81 in controls (p < 0.001). Similarly, <sup>18</sup>F-FMM showed a mean SUVR of 0.97 in AD mice compared to 0.94 in controls (p = 0.024). In contrast, <sup>18</sup>F-FPN did not show significant SUVR differences between AD and control groups (p = 0.071). Comparative analysis revealed that <sup>18</sup>F-FBB exhibited a significantly greater SUVR difference between AD and control groups compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FMM (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FBB emerged as the most effective radiopharmaceutical for imaging amyloid deposition in AD mouse models, providing superior differentiation between AD and control groups. These findings support the optimization of amyloid PET tracers for preclinical studies, facilitating advancements in Alzheimer's research.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9031,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neuroscience","volume":"26 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-025-00978-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is the leading cause of dementia, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and significant social and economic burdens. Despite extensive research into amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals, the effectiveness of various 18F-labeled tracers for imaging amyloid plaques in AD mouse models remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of three radiopharmaceuticals-18F-florbetaben (FBB), 18F-flutemetamol (FMM), and 18F-florapronol (FPN)-in differentiating amyloid deposition in AD and control mice.

Results: 18F-FMM and 18F-FBB demonstrated significantly higher standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in AD mice than in controls. For 18F-FBB, the mean SUVR in AD mice was 1.06, significantly higher than the 0.81 in controls (p < 0.001). Similarly, 18F-FMM showed a mean SUVR of 0.97 in AD mice compared to 0.94 in controls (p = 0.024). In contrast, 18F-FPN did not show significant SUVR differences between AD and control groups (p = 0.071). Comparative analysis revealed that 18F-FBB exhibited a significantly greater SUVR difference between AD and control groups compared to 18F-FMM (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: 18F-FBB emerged as the most effective radiopharmaceutical for imaging amyloid deposition in AD mouse models, providing superior differentiation between AD and control groups. These findings support the optimization of amyloid PET tracers for preclinical studies, facilitating advancements in Alzheimer's research.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

18f标记PET放射性药物在阿尔茨海默病小鼠模型中的比较研究。
背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,是痴呆症的主要原因,其特征是记忆丧失、认知能力下降,以及严重的社会和经济负担。尽管对淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET)放射性药物进行了广泛的研究,但各种18f标记的示踪剂在AD小鼠模型中成像淀粉样斑块的有效性仍然不确定。本研究旨在评价三种放射性药物——18f -氟倍他本(FBB)、18f -氟替他莫(FMM)和18f -氟哌诺醇(FPN)在AD小鼠和对照小鼠中分化淀粉样蛋白沉积的性能。结果:18F-FMM和18F-FBB在AD小鼠中的标准化摄取值比(SUVRs)明显高于对照组。对于18F-FBB, AD小鼠的平均SUVR为1.06,显著高于对照组的0.81 (p 18F-FMM显示AD小鼠的平均SUVR为0.97,而对照组为0.94 (p = 0.024)。相比之下,18F-FPN在AD组和对照组之间没有显着的SUVR差异(p = 0.071)。对比分析显示,与18F-FMM相比,18F-FBB在AD和对照组之间表现出更大的SUVR差异(p)。结论:18F-FBB是AD小鼠模型中成像淀粉样蛋白沉积最有效的放射性药物,在AD和对照组之间提供了优越的区分。这些发现支持优化淀粉样蛋白PET示踪剂用于临床前研究,促进阿尔茨海默病研究的进展。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neuroscience
BMC Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
16 months
期刊介绍: BMC Neuroscience is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of neuroscience, welcoming studies that provide insight into the molecular, cellular, developmental, genetic and genomic, systems, network, cognitive and behavioral aspects of nervous system function in both health and disease. Both experimental and theoretical studies are within scope, as are studies that describe methodological approaches to monitoring or manipulating nervous system function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信