AbVLM-Q: intelligent quality assessment for abdominal ultrasound standard planes via vision-language modeling.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Baohua Wang, Yaqian Wang, Yanhua Chu, Ke Zhang, Lei Liu, Kexin Zhang, Bowen Zhu, Dong Wang, Tianan Jiang
{"title":"AbVLM-Q: intelligent quality assessment for abdominal ultrasound standard planes via vision-language modeling.","authors":"Baohua Wang, Yaqian Wang, Yanhua Chu, Ke Zhang, Lei Liu, Kexin Zhang, Bowen Zhu, Dong Wang, Tianan Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01885-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal ultrasound is non-invasive and efficient, yet acquiring standard planes remains challenging due to operator dependency and procedural complexity. We propose AbVLM-Q, a vision-language framework for automated quality assessment of abdominal ultrasound standard planes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we assembled a multi-center dataset comprising 7,766 abdominal ultrasound scans, which were randomly divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The proposed method, AbVLM-Q, was developed using a three-step approach: (1) hierarchical prompting that incorporates spatially aware querying and sequential reasoning; (2) a quantifiable scoring mechanism based on multi-level clinical penalty criteria; and (3) LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)-based fine-tuning of a pretrained vision-language model. Performance was evaluated using mean recall, precision, label accuracy, subset accuracy, and confusion matrix analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The system achieved key structure detection with 88.90% mean recall and 98.10% precision, showing higher precision and comparable recall to Faster R-CNN (89.77% recall, 88.64% precision at a 0.5 confidence threshold). Plane classification yielded 98.96% label accuracy and 96.28% subset accuracy, surpassing the best CNN (97.84%, 94.29%; P < 0.05). Image scoring accuracy for the clinically critical \"Excellent\" grade (scores 8-10) reached 85.11% with the best-performing backbone. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed consistent performance across different backbones, with discrepancies primarily observed at grade boundaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AbVLM-Q provides a novel method for automated ultrasound quality assessment, functioning as both an evaluation tool and a training platform for standardized scanning. It bridges AI-driven imaging analysis with clinical workflows, enhancing quality control in ultrasound diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01885-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abdominal ultrasound is non-invasive and efficient, yet acquiring standard planes remains challenging due to operator dependency and procedural complexity. We propose AbVLM-Q, a vision-language framework for automated quality assessment of abdominal ultrasound standard planes.

Methods: In this study, we assembled a multi-center dataset comprising 7,766 abdominal ultrasound scans, which were randomly divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The proposed method, AbVLM-Q, was developed using a three-step approach: (1) hierarchical prompting that incorporates spatially aware querying and sequential reasoning; (2) a quantifiable scoring mechanism based on multi-level clinical penalty criteria; and (3) LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)-based fine-tuning of a pretrained vision-language model. Performance was evaluated using mean recall, precision, label accuracy, subset accuracy, and confusion matrix analysis.

Results: The system achieved key structure detection with 88.90% mean recall and 98.10% precision, showing higher precision and comparable recall to Faster R-CNN (89.77% recall, 88.64% precision at a 0.5 confidence threshold). Plane classification yielded 98.96% label accuracy and 96.28% subset accuracy, surpassing the best CNN (97.84%, 94.29%; P < 0.05). Image scoring accuracy for the clinically critical "Excellent" grade (scores 8-10) reached 85.11% with the best-performing backbone. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed consistent performance across different backbones, with discrepancies primarily observed at grade boundaries.

Conclusions: AbVLM-Q provides a novel method for automated ultrasound quality assessment, functioning as both an evaluation tool and a training platform for standardized scanning. It bridges AI-driven imaging analysis with clinical workflows, enhancing quality control in ultrasound diagnostics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

AbVLM-Q:基于视觉语言建模的腹部超声标准平面质量智能评估。
背景:腹部超声是非侵入性和高效的,但由于操作者的依赖性和程序的复杂性,获取标准平面仍然具有挑战性。我们提出AbVLM-Q,一个用于腹部超声标准平面自动质量评估的视觉语言框架。方法:在本研究中,我们组装了一个包含7,766个腹部超声扫描的多中心数据集,随机分为训练(70%)、验证(15%)和测试(15%)三个子集。提出的AbVLM-Q方法采用三步方法开发:(1)结合空间感知查询和顺序推理的分层提示;(2)基于多层次临床处罚标准的可量化评分机制;(3)基于LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)的预训练视觉语言模型微调。性能评估使用平均召回率,精度,标签准确性,子集准确性和混淆矩阵分析。结果:系统实现关键结构检测,平均查全率为88.90%,查全率为98.10%,查全率高于Faster R-CNN(查全率为89.77%,查全率为88.64%,置信阈值为0.5)。平面分类的标签准确率为98.96%,子集准确率为96.28%,超过了最好的CNN(97.84%, 94.29%)。结论:AbVLM-Q为自动化超声质量评估提供了一种新颖的方法,既可以作为评估工具,又可以作为标准化扫描的培训平台。它将人工智能驱动的成像分析与临床工作流程结合起来,增强了超声诊断的质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信