Choices of Artificial Intelligence (AI): ChatGPT's Solutions to Ethical Dilemmas in Bipolar Disorder Care.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Russell Franco D'Souza, Krishna Mohan Surapaneni, Mary Mathew, Shabbir Amanullah, Rajiv Tandon
{"title":"Choices of Artificial Intelligence (AI): ChatGPT's Solutions to Ethical Dilemmas in Bipolar Disorder Care.","authors":"Russell Franco D'Souza, Krishna Mohan Surapaneni, Mary Mathew, Shabbir Amanullah, Rajiv Tandon","doi":"10.1111/bdi.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorders present complex ethical challenges to patient care due to the delicate balance between patient autonomy and safety. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, holds the potential to address these dilemmas by providing personalized treatment plans, monitoring patient well-being, and reducing stigma associated with mental health issues. However, the application of AI in this context requires a deep understanding of the unique needs and vulnerabilities of individuals with bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This experimental study evaluated ChatGPT's (Version 3.5) responses to ethical dilemmas in bipolar disorder care using three clinical case scenarios reported in an open-access publication. The study compared ChatGPT's answers to an original answer key from the article. ChatGPT's responses were cross-checked and analyzed for alignment with the explanation given in the article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT provided mostly congruent responses with the original answer key, demonstrating its potential to offer insights and considerations for ethical dilemmas. However, there were variations in some responses, emphasizing the complexity of ethical decision-making in healthcare. These findings underscore the importance of combining AI-generated insights with human expertise in complex medical and ethical situations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT, and similar AI systems, can be valuable resources for addressing ethical concerns in bipolar disorder care. They offer guidance and information to clinicians, patients, and stakeholders, contributing to shared decision-making in healthcare. Nonetheless, the study highlights the essential role of human judgment and expertise in navigating intricate ethical dilemmas. Continuous research and development are necessary to enhance ChatGPT's capabilities and ensure responsible use, aligning AI assistance with the highest standards of patient care and ethical conduct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.70059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorders present complex ethical challenges to patient care due to the delicate balance between patient autonomy and safety. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, holds the potential to address these dilemmas by providing personalized treatment plans, monitoring patient well-being, and reducing stigma associated with mental health issues. However, the application of AI in this context requires a deep understanding of the unique needs and vulnerabilities of individuals with bipolar disorder.

Methods: This experimental study evaluated ChatGPT's (Version 3.5) responses to ethical dilemmas in bipolar disorder care using three clinical case scenarios reported in an open-access publication. The study compared ChatGPT's answers to an original answer key from the article. ChatGPT's responses were cross-checked and analyzed for alignment with the explanation given in the article.

Results: ChatGPT provided mostly congruent responses with the original answer key, demonstrating its potential to offer insights and considerations for ethical dilemmas. However, there were variations in some responses, emphasizing the complexity of ethical decision-making in healthcare. These findings underscore the importance of combining AI-generated insights with human expertise in complex medical and ethical situations.

Conclusion: ChatGPT, and similar AI systems, can be valuable resources for addressing ethical concerns in bipolar disorder care. They offer guidance and information to clinicians, patients, and stakeholders, contributing to shared decision-making in healthcare. Nonetheless, the study highlights the essential role of human judgment and expertise in navigating intricate ethical dilemmas. Continuous research and development are necessary to enhance ChatGPT's capabilities and ensure responsible use, aligning AI assistance with the highest standards of patient care and ethical conduct.

人工智能(AI)的选择:ChatGPT解决双相情感障碍治疗中的伦理困境。
背景:由于患者自主性和安全性之间的微妙平衡,双相情感障碍对患者护理提出了复杂的伦理挑战。人工智能(AI),特别是ChatGPT的使用,有可能通过提供个性化的治疗计划、监测患者的健康状况,以及减少与心理健康问题相关的耻辱感,来解决这些困境。然而,人工智能在这种情况下的应用需要深入了解双相情感障碍患者的独特需求和脆弱性。方法:本实验研究评估了ChatGPT(版本3.5)对双相情感障碍护理中伦理困境的反应,使用了开放获取出版物中报道的三个临床案例。该研究将ChatGPT的答案与文章中的原始答案进行了比较。ChatGPT的回答经过反复检查和分析,以确保与文章中给出的解释一致。结果:ChatGPT提供了与原始答案键基本一致的回答,显示了其为道德困境提供见解和考虑的潜力。然而,在一些回应中存在差异,强调了医疗保健伦理决策的复杂性。这些发现强调了在复杂的医疗和伦理情况下,将人工智能产生的见解与人类专业知识相结合的重要性。结论:ChatGPT和类似的人工智能系统可以成为解决双相情感障碍护理中伦理问题的宝贵资源。他们为临床医生、患者和利益相关者提供指导和信息,促进医疗保健领域的共同决策。尽管如此,这项研究强调了人类的判断和专业知识在处理复杂的道德困境中的重要作用。为了增强ChatGPT的能力并确保负责任的使用,将人工智能援助与最高标准的患者护理和道德行为保持一致,需要持续的研究和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信