Edgar V Peters, Tejaswi Koduru, Noam Hantman, Scott A McCallum, Qingqiu Huang, Jacqueline Cherfils, Catherine A Royer
{"title":"Putting a lid on it: The N-terminal helix of Arf1 inhibits switching via uniform stabilization.","authors":"Edgar V Peters, Tejaswi Koduru, Noam Hantman, Scott A McCallum, Qingqiu Huang, Jacqueline Cherfils, Catherine A Royer","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Arf and Arf-like GTPases, unlike all other Ras family GTPase members, exhibit a repressed conformation in their inactive, GDP-bound form. An important component of this autoinhibition is their N-terminal helix, which is missing in the other Ras family members. This helix caps a switch element called the interswitch, confining it to this repressed state. Activation by GDP/GTP exchange is primed by the dissociation of the N-terminal helix from the core of the protein, which precedes a massive conformational change and binding of GTP. An important unanswered question is how the energetics of Arf-GDP is remodeled at the initial step of activation, permitting the GDP/GTP reaction to proceed. In cells, the helix is displaced through interaction with a membrane, an effect that can be mimicked in solution by truncation mutants. Here, we used Arf1Δ17, a construct in which the N-terminal helix was deleted, to map the local stability of Arf1-GDP using high-pressure biophysical approaches, which we compared to that of full-length Arf1. Remarkably, deletion of the N-terminal helix decreased Arf1 stability across the entire structure. Thus, rather than imposing a specific allosteric pathway for repression, the N-terminal helix exercises global control of Arf1 stability to repress switching. This has important implications for understanding the energetics basis of the cooperation of membranes and guanine nucleotide exchange factors in Arf and Arf-like proteins activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.08.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Arf and Arf-like GTPases, unlike all other Ras family GTPase members, exhibit a repressed conformation in their inactive, GDP-bound form. An important component of this autoinhibition is their N-terminal helix, which is missing in the other Ras family members. This helix caps a switch element called the interswitch, confining it to this repressed state. Activation by GDP/GTP exchange is primed by the dissociation of the N-terminal helix from the core of the protein, which precedes a massive conformational change and binding of GTP. An important unanswered question is how the energetics of Arf-GDP is remodeled at the initial step of activation, permitting the GDP/GTP reaction to proceed. In cells, the helix is displaced through interaction with a membrane, an effect that can be mimicked in solution by truncation mutants. Here, we used Arf1Δ17, a construct in which the N-terminal helix was deleted, to map the local stability of Arf1-GDP using high-pressure biophysical approaches, which we compared to that of full-length Arf1. Remarkably, deletion of the N-terminal helix decreased Arf1 stability across the entire structure. Thus, rather than imposing a specific allosteric pathway for repression, the N-terminal helix exercises global control of Arf1 stability to repress switching. This has important implications for understanding the energetics basis of the cooperation of membranes and guanine nucleotide exchange factors in Arf and Arf-like proteins activation.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.