Pulse wave-driven machine learning for the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yanxin Wang, Lin Yang, Ziwei Li, Xinyu Zhang, Hongyang Zhao, Man Ji, Dongmei Hao, Jie Yang, Chong Wang, Ying Li, Guangfei Li
{"title":"Pulse wave-driven machine learning for the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis.","authors":"Yanxin Wang, Lin Yang, Ziwei Li, Xinyu Zhang, Hongyang Zhao, Man Ji, Dongmei Hao, Jie Yang, Chong Wang, Ying Li, Guangfei Li","doi":"10.1186/s12938-025-01436-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery calcification (CAC) represents a major cardiovascular risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Given that radial artery pulse waveforms can reflect vascular status, this study aimed to evaluate their utility in the non-invasive assessment of CAC severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>58 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis were enrolled. CAC severity was assessed using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and classified into four groups based on Agatston scores: no calcification (0), mild (1-100), moderate (101-400), and severe (> 400). Radial artery pulse waveforms were recorded before, hourly during, and after hemodialysis. Key features were extracted based on morphological differences among groups. Statistical inter-group comparisons and intra-group trend analyses were performed. A gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model was trained to classify CAC severity using waveform features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clear morphological differences were observed among the four CAC groups. The non-calcified group showed a distinct main wave followed by identifiable tidal waves. With increasing CAC severity, the tidal waves became progressively attenuated and less distinguishable, resulting in a smoother overall waveform, particularly in the severe calcification group. Pulse waveform features exhibited significant variation across CAC groups and over the hemodialysis process, including parameters related to waveform morphology, descending limb, complexity and distribution, mean value, and full-process stereoscopic pulse wave features. The GBDT model demonstrated robust and consistent performance, with an average accuracy of 84.1% and a macro-AUC of 0.962 in fivefold cross-validation, and comparable results (83.9% accuracy, 0.961 macro-AUC) on the independent test set. Notably, the model performed particularly well in identifying Severe Calcification cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radial artery pulse wave analysis may serve as a non-invasive adjunct for assessing CAC severity in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"24 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01436-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) represents a major cardiovascular risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Given that radial artery pulse waveforms can reflect vascular status, this study aimed to evaluate their utility in the non-invasive assessment of CAC severity.

Methods: 58 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis were enrolled. CAC severity was assessed using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and classified into four groups based on Agatston scores: no calcification (0), mild (1-100), moderate (101-400), and severe (> 400). Radial artery pulse waveforms were recorded before, hourly during, and after hemodialysis. Key features were extracted based on morphological differences among groups. Statistical inter-group comparisons and intra-group trend analyses were performed. A gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model was trained to classify CAC severity using waveform features.

Results: Clear morphological differences were observed among the four CAC groups. The non-calcified group showed a distinct main wave followed by identifiable tidal waves. With increasing CAC severity, the tidal waves became progressively attenuated and less distinguishable, resulting in a smoother overall waveform, particularly in the severe calcification group. Pulse waveform features exhibited significant variation across CAC groups and over the hemodialysis process, including parameters related to waveform morphology, descending limb, complexity and distribution, mean value, and full-process stereoscopic pulse wave features. The GBDT model demonstrated robust and consistent performance, with an average accuracy of 84.1% and a macro-AUC of 0.962 in fivefold cross-validation, and comparable results (83.9% accuracy, 0.961 macro-AUC) on the independent test set. Notably, the model performed particularly well in identifying Severe Calcification cases.

Conclusions: Radial artery pulse wave analysis may serve as a non-invasive adjunct for assessing CAC severity in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脉搏波驱动机器学习无创评估终末期肾病血液透析患者冠状动脉钙化
背景:在接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,冠状动脉钙化(CAC)是一个主要的心血管风险。鉴于桡动脉脉冲波形可以反映血管状态,本研究旨在评估其在非侵入性CAC严重程度评估中的应用。方法:选取58例接受血液透析治疗的ESRD患者。使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)评估CAC的严重程度,并根据Agatston评分将其分为四组:无钙化(0)、轻度(1-100)、中度(101-400)和重度(> 400)。分别记录血液透析前、透析中、透析后每小时桡动脉脉搏波形。基于组间形态学差异提取关键特征。组间比较及组内趋势分析。训练梯度增强决策树(GBDT)模型,利用波形特征对CAC严重程度进行分类。结果:4个CAC组之间存在明显的形态学差异。非钙化组显示出明显的主波,随后是可识别的潮汐波。随着CAC严重程度的增加,潮汐波逐渐减弱,难以区分,导致整体波形更平滑,特别是在严重钙化组。脉搏波形特征在CAC组和整个血液透析过程中表现出显著的变化,包括与波形形态、降肢、复杂性和分布、平均值和全程立体脉搏波特征相关的参数。在5次交叉验证中,GBDT模型的平均准确率为84.1%,宏观auc为0.962;在独立测试集上,GBDT模型的准确率为83.9%,宏观auc为0.961。值得注意的是,该模型在识别严重钙化病例方面表现得特别好。结论:桡动脉脉搏波分析可以作为一种非侵入性辅助手段来评估ESRD患者接受血液透析的CAC严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信