Hitesh S Sandhu, Kimberly Fan, Samir Shah, Xiaomeng Yuan, Laurel Metzler, Jennifer McArthur, Dai Kimura, Melissa Hines, Caitlin Hurley, Akshay Sharma, Katy Rower, Haitao Pan, Jeffery Brown, R Ray Morrison, Saad Ghafoor
{"title":"Pediatric Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support: Standardized Evaluation and Transfer Can Improve Survival.","authors":"Hitesh S Sandhu, Kimberly Fan, Samir Shah, Xiaomeng Yuan, Laurel Metzler, Jennifer McArthur, Dai Kimura, Melissa Hines, Caitlin Hurley, Akshay Sharma, Katy Rower, Haitao Pan, Jeffery Brown, R Ray Morrison, Saad Ghafoor","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant has increased, with steadily improving outcomes. To standardize our approach to early evaluation and identification of ECLS candidates, we developed the Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support (CHORPE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transferred between two pediatric hospitals for ECLS evaluation. Forty-six patients were transferred for ECLS evaluation: 17 pre-CHORPE, 28 post-CHORPE implementation, and 1 index patient between January 2010 and December 2021. Six were placed on ECLS in the preprocess group; three survived decannulation, but none survived to hospital discharge. In the post-process group, nine were placed on ECLS, with six surviving to decannulation and transfer back to the referring hospital (odds ratios [OR] = 24, p = 0.01) and five surviving to hospital discharge (OR = 15.9, p = 0.03). In the post-process group, there were fewer complications during transfer (p = 0.0228), and clinical improvement was the reason for not going on ECLS (p = 0.0120). A standardized approach to ECLS candidacy evaluation, early identification, and safe transfer with continuity of care is associated with improved survival after ECLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the last decade, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant has increased, with steadily improving outcomes. To standardize our approach to early evaluation and identification of ECLS candidates, we developed the Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support (CHORPE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transferred between two pediatric hospitals for ECLS evaluation. Forty-six patients were transferred for ECLS evaluation: 17 pre-CHORPE, 28 post-CHORPE implementation, and 1 index patient between January 2010 and December 2021. Six were placed on ECLS in the preprocess group; three survived decannulation, but none survived to hospital discharge. In the post-process group, nine were placed on ECLS, with six surviving to decannulation and transfer back to the referring hospital (odds ratios [OR] = 24, p = 0.01) and five surviving to hospital discharge (OR = 15.9, p = 0.03). In the post-process group, there were fewer complications during transfer (p = 0.0228), and clinical improvement was the reason for not going on ECLS (p = 0.0120). A standardized approach to ECLS candidacy evaluation, early identification, and safe transfer with continuity of care is associated with improved survival after ECLS.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.