Evaluating the impact of labor induction on autism spectrum disorder risk.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Omri Zamstein, Tamar Wainstock, Eyal Sheiner
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of labor induction on autism spectrum disorder risk.","authors":"Omri Zamstein, Tamar Wainstock, Eyal Sheiner","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08160-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Significant effort has been made in recent years to identify environmental factors-particularly perinatal exposures-that contribute to the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet many proposed associations remain inconsistent and inconclusive. Given the common use of labor induction for both medical indications and maternal preference, we aimed to investigate its potential association with ASD development, while accounting for synergistic factors that may influence its onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral center, focusing on singleton births. The study aimed to compare the occurrence of ASD in children, considering both hospital and community-based diagnoses, in relation to whether labor was induced (using mechanical cervical ripening or prostaglandins, with or without oxytocin) or began spontaneously. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to assess the cumulative incidence of ASD, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to account for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 115,081 births, 13,071 (11.4%) were labor induced, with the remainder beginning spontaneously. Pregnancy complications, such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia or eclampsia, and non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns, were significantly more common in the labor induction group (p<0.001 for all). During follow-up, 767 children were diagnosed with ASD: 1.0% in the labor induction group and 0.6% in the spontaneous labor onset group (p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for ASD diagnosis in the labor induction group (log-rank p-value <0.001). However, after adjusting for maternal and perinatal factors such as maternal age, cesarean delivery, ethnicity, and gestational conditions, no significant association was found between labor induction and ASD risk (adjusted HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.47, p = 0.063).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Labor induction was associated with a higher ASD incidence but not as an independent risk factor after adjusting for maternal and perinatal factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08160-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Significant effort has been made in recent years to identify environmental factors-particularly perinatal exposures-that contribute to the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet many proposed associations remain inconsistent and inconclusive. Given the common use of labor induction for both medical indications and maternal preference, we aimed to investigate its potential association with ASD development, while accounting for synergistic factors that may influence its onset.

Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral center, focusing on singleton births. The study aimed to compare the occurrence of ASD in children, considering both hospital and community-based diagnoses, in relation to whether labor was induced (using mechanical cervical ripening or prostaglandins, with or without oxytocin) or began spontaneously. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to assess the cumulative incidence of ASD, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to account for confounding variables.

Results: Among 115,081 births, 13,071 (11.4%) were labor induced, with the remainder beginning spontaneously. Pregnancy complications, such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia or eclampsia, and non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns, were significantly more common in the labor induction group (p<0.001 for all). During follow-up, 767 children were diagnosed with ASD: 1.0% in the labor induction group and 0.6% in the spontaneous labor onset group (p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for ASD diagnosis in the labor induction group (log-rank p-value <0.001). However, after adjusting for maternal and perinatal factors such as maternal age, cesarean delivery, ethnicity, and gestational conditions, no significant association was found between labor induction and ASD risk (adjusted HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.47, p = 0.063).

Conclusion: Labor induction was associated with a higher ASD incidence but not as an independent risk factor after adjusting for maternal and perinatal factors.

评估引产对自闭症谱系障碍风险的影响。
目的:近年来,人们已经做出了巨大的努力来确定环境因素-特别是围产期暴露-有助于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的发展,但许多提出的关联仍然不一致和不确定。鉴于引产在医学指征和产妇偏好方面的普遍使用,我们的目的是研究其与ASD发展的潜在关联,同时考虑可能影响其发病的协同因素。方法:在三级转诊中心进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,重点是单胎分娩。该研究旨在比较儿童中ASD的发生率,考虑到医院和社区诊断,与分娩是否引产(使用机械宫颈成熟或前列腺素,有或没有催产素)或自发分娩有关。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线用于评估ASD的累积发病率,Cox比例风险模型用于解释混杂变量。结果:115,081例分娩中,引产13,071例(11.4%),其余为自然分娩。妊娠并发症,如妊娠期糖尿病、先兆子痫或子痫,以及不可靠的胎儿心率模式,在引产组中明显更常见(结论:引产与较高的ASD发病率相关,但在调整母体和围产期因素后,它不是一个独立的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信