Identifying High-Impact Solutions to Address Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Lupus: A Consensus-Based Approach.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Joy Buie, Michael P Fisher, Kristen Backor, Hannah Tyldsley, Ashira Blazer, Candace Feldman, Andrea Knight, S Sam Lim, Barbara Ann Polk, Ed Yelin, Edith Williams, Karen H Costenbader
{"title":"Identifying High-Impact Solutions to Address Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Lupus: A Consensus-Based Approach.","authors":"Joy Buie, Michael P Fisher, Kristen Backor, Hannah Tyldsley, Ashira Blazer, Candace Feldman, Andrea Knight, S Sam Lim, Barbara Ann Polk, Ed Yelin, Edith Williams, Karen H Costenbader","doi":"10.1002/acr.25635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted formative research aimed at identifying solutions that address inequitable health outcomes in lupus due to adverse social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a search for keywords which provided insights into potential solutions and initiatives underway. An advisory panel of lupus experts iteratively reviewed the list of literature-scoped solutions in working sessions, filling knowledge gaps, which allowed for further defining and classifying solutions based on area of focus, feasibility, and impact. Seven-in-depth semi-structured discussions and a modified Delphi survey approach were leveraged to align the advisory panel based on feasibility, impact, and costs of the proposed solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three solutions were identified and classified into four key categories: Financial Safety Net, Patient Education and Shared Decision-Making, Physician Education, and Other Solutions. High-impact solutions that were prioritized included \"Collecting granular information like patient-reported outcomes to provide personalized care and accelerate development of new products,\" \"Expanding Medicaid coverage via infrastructure,\" and \"Supporting people living with lupus in applying and getting approval for disability.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing health and healthcare disparities linked to negative social determinants of health is a key goal in the management of lupus, as disparities in outcomes can be stark. Increasing the visibility of potential solutions and aligning the community on top priorities can enable more efficient and effective contributions to healthcare equity and ultimately better health outcomes for people living with lupus.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We conducted formative research aimed at identifying solutions that address inequitable health outcomes in lupus due to adverse social determinants of health.

Methods: We conducted a search for keywords which provided insights into potential solutions and initiatives underway. An advisory panel of lupus experts iteratively reviewed the list of literature-scoped solutions in working sessions, filling knowledge gaps, which allowed for further defining and classifying solutions based on area of focus, feasibility, and impact. Seven-in-depth semi-structured discussions and a modified Delphi survey approach were leveraged to align the advisory panel based on feasibility, impact, and costs of the proposed solutions.

Results: Thirty-three solutions were identified and classified into four key categories: Financial Safety Net, Patient Education and Shared Decision-Making, Physician Education, and Other Solutions. High-impact solutions that were prioritized included "Collecting granular information like patient-reported outcomes to provide personalized care and accelerate development of new products," "Expanding Medicaid coverage via infrastructure," and "Supporting people living with lupus in applying and getting approval for disability."

Conclusion: Addressing health and healthcare disparities linked to negative social determinants of health is a key goal in the management of lupus, as disparities in outcomes can be stark. Increasing the visibility of potential solutions and aligning the community on top priorities can enable more efficient and effective contributions to healthcare equity and ultimately better health outcomes for people living with lupus.

确定高影响力的解决方案,以解决种族和民族的健康差距在狼疮:基于共识的方法。
目的:我们进行了形成性研究,旨在确定解决由于不利的健康社会决定因素而导致的狼疮不公平健康结果的解决方案。方法:我们进行了关键词搜索,这些关键词提供了对潜在解决方案和正在进行的举措的见解。狼疮专家咨询小组在工作会议上反复审查了文献范围内的解决方案清单,填补了知识空白,从而可以根据重点领域、可行性和影响进一步定义和分类解决方案。通过七次深入的半结构化讨论和改进的德尔菲调查方法,咨询小组根据提出的解决方案的可行性、影响和成本进行了调整。结果:确定了33种解决方案,并将其分为四大类:金融安全网、患者教育和共同决策、医生教育和其他解决方案。优先考虑的高影响力解决方案包括“收集患者报告结果等详细信息,以提供个性化护理并加速新产品的开发”,“通过基础设施扩大医疗补助覆盖范围”,以及“支持狼疮患者申请和获得残疾批准”。结论:解决与健康的负面社会决定因素相关的健康和医疗保健差异是狼疮管理的关键目标,因为结果的差异可能是明显的。提高潜在解决方案的可见性,并使社区在最优先事项上保持一致,可以为医疗保健公平做出更高效和有效的贡献,并最终改善狼疮患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信