Repeat cell-free DNA screening after initial false-positive results and term placental analysis for confined mosaicism: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yvette C Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Melody Menezes, Ben W Mol, Tristan Hardy, Kara Levin, Emma Brown, Andrew McLennan, Daniel Lorber Rolnik
{"title":"Repeat cell-free DNA screening after initial false-positive results and term placental analysis for confined mosaicism: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Yvette C Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Melody Menezes, Ben W Mol, Tristan Hardy, Kara Levin, Emma Brown, Andrew McLennan, Daniel Lorber Rolnik","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08162-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>False-positive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA) results may arise from confined placental mosaicism (CPM). This cohort study examines the persistence of high-risk cfDNA in the third pregnancy trimester after exclusion of fetal involvement, and the concordance of these results with CPM in the postpartum placenta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant individuals receiving a false-positive primary cfDNA result were recruited from Monash Health and Monash Ultrasound for Women in Melbourne, Australia, between August 2023 and December 2024. Participants underwent genome-wide repeat cfDNA screening (r-cfDNA) after 30 + 0 weeks' gestation. Placental samples were collected and cytogenetically analysed postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cohort included 21 individuals, of which 33.3% (7/21) screened high-risk on r-cfDNA. There was no significant association between r-cfDNA and CPM in the postpartum placenta (p = 0.397), as five (5/12, 41.7%) cases involving CPM were screened 'low-risk'. Fetal-fraction was significantly lower (5.0% [IQR = 4.6-8.0%] vs. 9.0% [IQR = 7.0-13.5%], p = 0.025), and maternal BMI (Kg/m2) higher (29.0 [IQR = 25.7-31.2] vs. 23.3 [IQR = 22.0-24.9], p = 0.006), in false-positive cases not attributable to CPM detected by r-cfDNA or postpartum. High-risk r-cfDNA results were associated with smaller babies (median birthweight percentile = 12.3 [IQR = 4.4-21.7] vs. 31.9 [IQR = 21.5-55.5], p = 0.009), though the majority of outcomes were favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-risk r-cfDNA is not a sensitive predictor of CPM, though high mosaic ratios are associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. An alternative explanation for false-positive cfDNA besides CPM may be low fetal fraction, particularly in the context of high maternal BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08162-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: False-positive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA) results may arise from confined placental mosaicism (CPM). This cohort study examines the persistence of high-risk cfDNA in the third pregnancy trimester after exclusion of fetal involvement, and the concordance of these results with CPM in the postpartum placenta.

Methods: Pregnant individuals receiving a false-positive primary cfDNA result were recruited from Monash Health and Monash Ultrasound for Women in Melbourne, Australia, between August 2023 and December 2024. Participants underwent genome-wide repeat cfDNA screening (r-cfDNA) after 30 + 0 weeks' gestation. Placental samples were collected and cytogenetically analysed postpartum.

Results: This cohort included 21 individuals, of which 33.3% (7/21) screened high-risk on r-cfDNA. There was no significant association between r-cfDNA and CPM in the postpartum placenta (p = 0.397), as five (5/12, 41.7%) cases involving CPM were screened 'low-risk'. Fetal-fraction was significantly lower (5.0% [IQR = 4.6-8.0%] vs. 9.0% [IQR = 7.0-13.5%], p = 0.025), and maternal BMI (Kg/m2) higher (29.0 [IQR = 25.7-31.2] vs. 23.3 [IQR = 22.0-24.9], p = 0.006), in false-positive cases not attributable to CPM detected by r-cfDNA or postpartum. High-risk r-cfDNA results were associated with smaller babies (median birthweight percentile = 12.3 [IQR = 4.4-21.7] vs. 31.9 [IQR = 21.5-55.5], p = 0.009), though the majority of outcomes were favorable.

Conclusion: High-risk r-cfDNA is not a sensitive predictor of CPM, though high mosaic ratios are associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. An alternative explanation for false-positive cfDNA besides CPM may be low fetal fraction, particularly in the context of high maternal BMI.

在最初的假阳性结果后重复无细胞DNA筛查和限制性嵌合体的长期胎盘分析:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的:产前无细胞DNA筛查(cfDNA)结果假阳性可能是由受限的胎盘嵌合(CPM)引起的。本队列研究探讨了排除胎儿累及后妊娠晚期高危cfDNA的持久性,以及这些结果与产后胎盘CPM的一致性。方法:在2023年8月至2024年12月期间,从澳大利亚墨尔本的莫纳什健康和莫纳什妇女超声中心招募了原发性cfDNA假阳性的孕妇。参与者在妊娠30 + 0周后进行全基因组重复cfDNA筛查(r-cfDNA)。产后采集胎盘标本进行细胞遗传学分析。结果:该队列包括21例个体,其中33.3%(7/21)筛查出r-cfDNA高危人群。r-cfDNA与产后胎盘CPM无显著相关性(p = 0.397), 5例(5/12,41.7%)CPM为“低危”。在非r-cfDNA检测CPM或产后假阳性的病例中,胎儿分数显著低于(5.0% [IQR = 4.6-8.0%] vs. 9.0% [IQR = 7.0-13.5%], p = 0.025),母亲BMI (Kg/m2)显著高于(29.0 [IQR = 25.7-31.2] vs. 23.3 [IQR = 22.0-24.9], p = 0.006)。高危r-cfDNA结果与较小的婴儿相关(中位出生体重百分位数= 12.3 [IQR = 4.4-21.7]对31.9 [IQR = 21.5-55.5], p = 0.009),尽管大多数结果是有利的。结论:高风险r-cfDNA不是CPM的敏感预测因子,尽管高镶嵌比与不良产科结局相关。除了CPM外,cfDNA假阳性的另一种解释可能是胎儿分数低,特别是在母亲BMI高的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信