Factors Affecting Quality Control (QC) Failure Rates in Somatic Breast Cancer (BRCA) Gene Testing in Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer: Experiences From an Australian Cancer Care Centre.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cian O'Leary, Edward Yoong, Admire Matsika, Niara Oliveira
{"title":"Factors Affecting Quality Control (QC) Failure Rates in Somatic Breast Cancer (BRCA) Gene Testing in Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer: Experiences From an Australian Cancer Care Centre.","authors":"Cian O'Leary, Edward Yoong, Admire Matsika, Niara Oliveira","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a common malignancy with poor prognostic outcomes. Breast cancer (BRCA) genes 1 and 2 mutations occur in prostate cancers and confer poorer prognoses. Somatic BRCA testing can lead to inconclusive results, which can gatekeep patients from accessing targeted medications. We assessed the somatic BRCA testing results among our cohort of CRPC patients for factors contributing to quality control (QC) failures and inconclusive testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of the records of all patients with CRPC attending our cancer care centers from 2020 to 2023. We identified the presence/absence of somatic BRCA testing results on their record. For those with returned results, we collected key information including biopsy characteristics, time from biopsy to BRCA result, and outcome of BRCA testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 patients with CRPC attended our service between January 2020 and 2023. A total of 54 patients (40%) had somatic BRCA testing performed on a tumor biopsy sample. A total of 35 somatic tests (65%) returned an actionable (positive or negative) result. The remaining 19 (35%) returned as inconclusive/QC failures. QC failures were significantly associated with a greater time from initial biopsy to somatic testing result (60 vs. 27 months, p = 0.033). The type of tissue biopsied, tumor percentage in biopsy sample, tissue sampling method, and sampling hospital did not contribute significantly to QC failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A longer tissue retention interval from biopsy to somatic BRCA testing is associated with a greater risk of inconclusive test results. We recommend a repeat biopsy for BRCA testing in CRPC patients where archival tissue is older than 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a common malignancy with poor prognostic outcomes. Breast cancer (BRCA) genes 1 and 2 mutations occur in prostate cancers and confer poorer prognoses. Somatic BRCA testing can lead to inconclusive results, which can gatekeep patients from accessing targeted medications. We assessed the somatic BRCA testing results among our cohort of CRPC patients for factors contributing to quality control (QC) failures and inconclusive testing.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the records of all patients with CRPC attending our cancer care centers from 2020 to 2023. We identified the presence/absence of somatic BRCA testing results on their record. For those with returned results, we collected key information including biopsy characteristics, time from biopsy to BRCA result, and outcome of BRCA testing.

Results: A total of 147 patients with CRPC attended our service between January 2020 and 2023. A total of 54 patients (40%) had somatic BRCA testing performed on a tumor biopsy sample. A total of 35 somatic tests (65%) returned an actionable (positive or negative) result. The remaining 19 (35%) returned as inconclusive/QC failures. QC failures were significantly associated with a greater time from initial biopsy to somatic testing result (60 vs. 27 months, p = 0.033). The type of tissue biopsied, tumor percentage in biopsy sample, tissue sampling method, and sampling hospital did not contribute significantly to QC failure.

Conclusions: A longer tissue retention interval from biopsy to somatic BRCA testing is associated with a greater risk of inconclusive test results. We recommend a repeat biopsy for BRCA testing in CRPC patients where archival tissue is older than 5 years.

影响体细胞乳腺癌(BRCA)基因检测在去势抵抗性前列腺癌中质量控制(QC)失败率的因素:来自澳大利亚癌症护理中心的经验
目的:去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,预后较差。乳腺癌(BRCA)基因1和2突变发生在前列腺癌中,导致预后较差。体细胞BRCA检测可能导致不确定的结果,这可能会阻碍患者获得靶向药物。我们在CRPC患者队列中评估了躯体BRCA检测结果,以寻找导致质量控制(QC)失败和不确定检测的因素。方法:我们对2020年至2023年在我们癌症护理中心就诊的所有CRPC患者的记录进行了回顾性分析。我们在他们的记录中确定了存在/不存在体细胞BRCA检测结果。对于返回结果的患者,我们收集了包括活检特征、从活检到BRCA结果的时间以及BRCA检测结果在内的关键信息。结果:2020年1月至2023年1月,共有147例CRPC患者参加了我们的服务。共有54名患者(40%)在肿瘤活检样本上进行了体细胞BRCA检测。共有35项(65%)躯体试验返回可操作的(阳性或阴性)结果。其余19个(35%)作为不确定/QC失败返回。QC失败与从最初活检到躯体检测结果的较长时间显著相关(60个月对27个月,p = 0.033)。活检组织类型、活检样本中肿瘤百分比、组织取样方法和取样医院对质量控制失败无显著影响。结论:从活检到体细胞BRCA检测的组织保留间隔越长,检测结果不确定的风险越大。我们建议在档案组织超过5年的CRPC患者中重复活检进行BRCA检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信