Male Sex, Masculinization, Sexual Orientation, and Gynephilia Synergistically Predict Increased Sexual Jealousy

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Mons Bendixen, David P. Schmitt
{"title":"Male Sex, Masculinization, Sexual Orientation, and Gynephilia Synergistically Predict Increased Sexual Jealousy","authors":"Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair,&nbsp;Mons Bendixen,&nbsp;David P. Schmitt","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03225-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A robust, cross-cultural sex difference is typically found in jealousy responses to reveal emotional versus sexual infidelity. The only factor that seems to moderate this sex difference is sexual orientation, with male heterosexuals conspicuously reporting the greatest distress to sexual infidelity. Attempts at considering additional effects of psychological feminization and masculinization on jealousy responses have proven less reliable. In a sample of 4465 participants aged between 16 and 80 years (<i>M</i> = 35.41, <i>SD</i> = 13.07), including gay, lesbian, heterosexuals, bisexuals, and pansexuals, we examined how four indicators of feminization–masculinization were associated with sexual orientation and, subsequently, to jealousy responses to infidelity. We found that an exclusive gynephilic orientation and male sex in combination shifted the typical emotional jealousy focus toward more sexual jealousy. The four indicators of feminization–masculinization were linked to sexual orientation and, subsequently, to variable jealousy responses among men, but were only linked to sexual orientation among women. These findings support the position that female versus male mating psychology is not simplistically dimorphic. Instead, sex differences probably result from many different and continuous “psychological dials” that interact with each other, while also functioning in ways that are partially modular or independent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"54 8","pages":"3189 - 3203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-025-03225-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03225-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A robust, cross-cultural sex difference is typically found in jealousy responses to reveal emotional versus sexual infidelity. The only factor that seems to moderate this sex difference is sexual orientation, with male heterosexuals conspicuously reporting the greatest distress to sexual infidelity. Attempts at considering additional effects of psychological feminization and masculinization on jealousy responses have proven less reliable. In a sample of 4465 participants aged between 16 and 80 years (M = 35.41, SD = 13.07), including gay, lesbian, heterosexuals, bisexuals, and pansexuals, we examined how four indicators of feminization–masculinization were associated with sexual orientation and, subsequently, to jealousy responses to infidelity. We found that an exclusive gynephilic orientation and male sex in combination shifted the typical emotional jealousy focus toward more sexual jealousy. The four indicators of feminization–masculinization were linked to sexual orientation and, subsequently, to variable jealousy responses among men, but were only linked to sexual orientation among women. These findings support the position that female versus male mating psychology is not simplistically dimorphic. Instead, sex differences probably result from many different and continuous “psychological dials” that interact with each other, while also functioning in ways that are partially modular or independent.

男性性别、男性化、性取向和女性偏好协同预测性嫉妒增加。
一个强大的,跨文化的性别差异通常是在嫉妒反应中发现的,以揭示情感上的不忠和性上的不忠。唯一能缓和这种性别差异的因素是性取向,异性恋男性对性不忠的痛苦程度最高。考虑心理女性化和男性化对嫉妒反应的额外影响的尝试已被证明不太可靠。在4465名年龄在16岁到80岁之间(M = 35.41, SD = 13.07)的参与者中,包括男同性恋、女同性恋、异性恋、双性恋和泛性恋者,我们研究了女性化-男性化的四个指标与性取向以及对不忠的嫉妒反应之间的关系。我们发现,独有的女性取向和男性性别相结合,将典型的情感嫉妒转向更多的性嫉妒。女性化-男性化的四个指标与性取向有关,随后与男性的可变嫉妒反应有关,但只与女性的性取向有关。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即女性与男性的交配心理并不是简单的二态性。相反,性别差异可能是由于许多不同的、连续的“心理刻度盘”相互作用,同时也以部分模块化或独立的方式起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信