PROPREDICT Decision Support Tool: Using Evidence to Guide Precision Prosthesis Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Daniel C Norvell, David C Morgenroth, Joseph M Czerniecki, Elizabeth G Halsne, Wayne Biggs, Joseph Webster, Aaron P Turner, Rhonda M Williams, Alison W Henderson
{"title":"PROPREDICT Decision Support Tool: Using Evidence to Guide Precision Prosthesis Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning.","authors":"Daniel C Norvell, David C Morgenroth, Joseph M Czerniecki, Elizabeth G Halsne, Wayne Biggs, Joseph Webster, Aaron P Turner, Rhonda M Williams, Alison W Henderson","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate the previously validated AMPREDICT PROsthetics prediction model into a web-based, clinical decision support tool (DST) for use at the time of initial prosthetic evaluation to predict 4 levels of prosthetic mobility 12 months after prescription.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The previously validated AMPREDICT PROsthetics prediction model provided the predictors with corresponding coefficients to develop an online DST. The content and aesthetics of the DST was created by the authors with iterative input from an expert panel gathered via a user-friendly input page and access to a DST simulation with graphic display of predicted mobility levels. This beta DST underwent formal usability testing using a think aloud approach with a quantitative assessment of usability and qualitative interviews to address user-friendliness, readability, functionality, and potential implementation challenges.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twelve clinicians (N=12), who regularly participate in prosthetic prescription and represent the intended target users of the PROPREDICT DST, were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Qualitative themes and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSSUQ overall (and subscale scores) were highly favorable, with a mean overall score of 1.58 from a potential range 1.0-7.0 (lower score greater usability). Participant feedback identified the following potential clinical utility of the DST: (1) assisting in counseling patients on prosthesis selection; (2) setting expectations for future mobility; and (3) sharing DST input with the clinical team to aid in rehabilitation planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PROPREDICT DST (www.prodecide.org) was successfully developed and tested for usability and clinical relevance. Rehabilitation providers are optimistic about its potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To translate the previously validated AMPREDICT PROsthetics prediction model into a web-based, clinical decision support tool (DST) for use at the time of initial prosthetic evaluation to predict 4 levels of prosthetic mobility 12 months after prescription.

Design: The previously validated AMPREDICT PROsthetics prediction model provided the predictors with corresponding coefficients to develop an online DST. The content and aesthetics of the DST was created by the authors with iterative input from an expert panel gathered via a user-friendly input page and access to a DST simulation with graphic display of predicted mobility levels. This beta DST underwent formal usability testing using a think aloud approach with a quantitative assessment of usability and qualitative interviews to address user-friendliness, readability, functionality, and potential implementation challenges.

Setting: The Veterans Health Administration.

Participants: Twelve clinicians (N=12), who regularly participate in prosthetic prescription and represent the intended target users of the PROPREDICT DST, were included.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Qualitative themes and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ).

Results: The PSSUQ overall (and subscale scores) were highly favorable, with a mean overall score of 1.58 from a potential range 1.0-7.0 (lower score greater usability). Participant feedback identified the following potential clinical utility of the DST: (1) assisting in counseling patients on prosthesis selection; (2) setting expectations for future mobility; and (3) sharing DST input with the clinical team to aid in rehabilitation planning.

Conclusions: The PROPREDICT DST (www.prodecide.org) was successfully developed and tested for usability and clinical relevance. Rehabilitation providers are optimistic about its potential.

PROPREDICT决策支持工具:使用证据指导精确义肢处方和康复计划。
目的:将先前验证的AMPREDICT义肢预测模型转化为基于网络的临床决策支持工具(DST),用于初始义肢评估,预测处方后12个月义肢活动的四个级别。设计:先前验证的AMPREDICT假肢预测模型为预测者提供了相应的系数,以开发在线DST。DST的内容和美学是由作者根据专家小组的反复输入创建的,专家小组通过用户友好的输入页面聚集在一起,并访问带有预测移动水平图形显示的DST模拟。这个beta版DST使用一种有声思考的方法进行了正式的可用性测试,对可用性进行了定量评估,并进行了定性访谈,以解决用户友好性、可读性、功能和潜在的实现挑战。地点:退伍军人健康管理局。参与者:12名定期参加假体处方的临床医生,他们代表PROPREDICT DST的预期目标用户。干预措施:没有。主要结果测量:定性主题和研究后系统可用性问卷(PSSUQ)。结果:PSSUQ总体(和子量表得分)非常有利,在1.0-7.0的潜在范围内平均总分为1.58(分数越低可用性越好)。参与者的反馈确定了DST的以下潜在临床用途:(1)协助为患者提供义肢选择咨询,(2)设定对未来活动能力的期望,以及(3)与临床团队分享DST的输入以帮助康复计划。结论:PROPREDICT DST (www.prodecide.org)开发成功,并通过了可用性和临床相关性测试。康复服务提供者对其潜力持乐观态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信