Ling Chen, Lingqiang Min, Qiangjun Gan, Botian Ye, Guochao Zhao, Dansong Wang
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oncologic Surgical Emergencies: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ling Chen, Lingqiang Min, Qiangjun Gan, Botian Ye, Guochao Zhao, Dansong Wang","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18031-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncologic surgical emergencies (OSEs) are increasing, with rising cancer incidences and prolonged patient survival. However, prior OSEs studies have been limited by a narrow focus. This study aimed to determine whether a five-category classification for OSEs can effectively guide clinical decision-making based on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used prospectively collected data from 1 May 2015 to 31 December 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Among in-patients undergoing emergency general surgery, 2908 patients with OSEs were included. The OSEs were classified into five categories based on the tumor course: (1) emergency as the initial symptom, (2) emergency due to tumor progression or recurrence, (3) complications from non-invasive treatments, (4) complications from invasive treatments, and (5) emergencies unrelated to tumors but with a history of malignancy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Obstruction was the most common emergency (58.0%), and gastrointestinal tumors were the primary source (79.8%). Category 1 emergencies were the most frequent (42.8%), followed by categories 2 (16.4%), 4 (16.0%), 5 (19.5%), and 3 (5.5%). The patients with OSEs had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than those with other types of emergencies (4.0% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). Perforation, age ≥ 65 years, and male sex were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comprehensive five-category classification system for OSEs provided a valuable framework that may enhance clinical decision-making and guide management strategies for this patient population. Thus, it has potential to be integrated into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7652-7659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18031-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oncologic surgical emergencies (OSEs) are increasing, with rising cancer incidences and prolonged patient survival. However, prior OSEs studies have been limited by a narrow focus. This study aimed to determine whether a five-category classification for OSEs can effectively guide clinical decision-making based on patient outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used prospectively collected data from 1 May 2015 to 31 December 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Among in-patients undergoing emergency general surgery, 2908 patients with OSEs were included. The OSEs were classified into five categories based on the tumor course: (1) emergency as the initial symptom, (2) emergency due to tumor progression or recurrence, (3) complications from non-invasive treatments, (4) complications from invasive treatments, and (5) emergencies unrelated to tumors but with a history of malignancy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Results: Obstruction was the most common emergency (58.0%), and gastrointestinal tumors were the primary source (79.8%). Category 1 emergencies were the most frequent (42.8%), followed by categories 2 (16.4%), 4 (16.0%), 5 (19.5%), and 3 (5.5%). The patients with OSEs had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than those with other types of emergencies (4.0% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). Perforation, age ≥ 65 years, and male sex were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.
Conclusions: The comprehensive five-category classification system for OSEs provided a valuable framework that may enhance clinical decision-making and guide management strategies for this patient population. Thus, it has potential to be integrated into clinical practice.
背景:随着癌症发病率的上升和患者生存期的延长,肿瘤外科急诊(oes)正在增加。然而,先前的操作系统研究受到狭隘焦点的限制。本研究旨在确定是否有五类OSEs分类可以有效地指导临床决策基于患者的结果。方法:回顾性队列研究前瞻性收集复旦大学中山医院2015年5月1日至2023年12月31日的资料。在接受急诊普通外科手术的住院患者中,纳入了2908例OSEs患者。根据肿瘤的病程,将这些突发事件分为5类:(1)作为初始症状的突发事件,(2)肿瘤进展或复发引起的突发事件,(3)非侵入性治疗并发症,(4)侵入性治疗并发症,(5)与肿瘤无关但有恶性肿瘤病史的突发事件。主要终点是住院死亡率。结果:梗阻是最常见的急症(58.0%),胃肠道肿瘤是主要的急症来源(79.8%)。第1类紧急情况最常见(42.8%),其次是第2类(16.4%)、第4类(16.0%)、第5类(19.5%)和第3类(5.5%)。OSEs患者的住院死亡率高于其他类型急诊患者(4.0% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001)。穿孔、年龄≥65岁和男性是院内死亡的独立危险因素。结论:全面的五类分类系统为该患者群体的临床决策和指导管理策略提供了一个有价值的框架。因此,它具有整合到临床实践中的潜力。
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.