Sex-Based Differences in Medullary Thyroid Cancer Survival: A Matched Analysis of 4602 Patients.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-18067-1
Nathan Gabriel Sattah, Vincent M D'Anniballe, Samantha M Thomas, Alberto J Monreal, Randall Paul Scheri, Hadiza Shu'aib Kazaure
{"title":"Sex-Based Differences in Medullary Thyroid Cancer Survival: A Matched Analysis of 4602 Patients.","authors":"Nathan Gabriel Sattah, Vincent M D'Anniballe, Samantha M Thomas, Alberto J Monreal, Randall Paul Scheri, Hadiza Shu'aib Kazaure","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18067-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whereas medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is more common in female patients, studies have indicated that MTC is more aggressive in males. It is unknown whether sex-based differences in MTC outcomes are due to inherent tumor behavior or factors such as care characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with MTC stages I to IV were identified using the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Male patients were matched one-to-one with females based on pathologic staging. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association of biologic sex with OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study matched 4062 patients (2031 females and 2031 males). The median age was 55 years (interquartile range, 43-66 years). Age, race, comorbidity score, and care characteristics such as time to diagnosis and surgery type did not differ by sex (all p > 0.05). Pathologic stage was primarily stage IVA (35.5%), followed by stages I (24.7%) and III (18.9%). The unadjusted 10-year OS for the female patients was 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.7-83.2%) versus 69.6% (95% CI 66.8-72.3%) for the male patients (p < 0.001, log-rank). Survival for the male patients with stages II, III, and IVA disease was significantly worse (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, the male patients showed an 81% higher mortality risk than the female patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81, 95% CI 1.50-2.20; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite patient-matching and adjustment for several factors, the male patients with MTC demonstrate worse survival than the matched female patients. These findings indicate that MTC behavior differs by sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7505-7515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18067-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whereas medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is more common in female patients, studies have indicated that MTC is more aggressive in males. It is unknown whether sex-based differences in MTC outcomes are due to inherent tumor behavior or factors such as care characteristics.

Methods: Patients with MTC stages I to IV were identified using the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Male patients were matched one-to-one with females based on pathologic staging. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association of biologic sex with OS.

Results: The study matched 4062 patients (2031 females and 2031 males). The median age was 55 years (interquartile range, 43-66 years). Age, race, comorbidity score, and care characteristics such as time to diagnosis and surgery type did not differ by sex (all p > 0.05). Pathologic stage was primarily stage IVA (35.5%), followed by stages I (24.7%) and III (18.9%). The unadjusted 10-year OS for the female patients was 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.7-83.2%) versus 69.6% (95% CI 66.8-72.3%) for the male patients (p < 0.001, log-rank). Survival for the male patients with stages II, III, and IVA disease was significantly worse (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, the male patients showed an 81% higher mortality risk than the female patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81, 95% CI 1.50-2.20; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Despite patient-matching and adjustment for several factors, the male patients with MTC demonstrate worse survival than the matched female patients. These findings indicate that MTC behavior differs by sex.

基于性别的甲状腺髓样癌生存差异:4602例匹配分析
背景:虽然甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)在女性患者中更为常见,但研究表明,MTC在男性中更具侵袭性。目前尚不清楚基于性别的MTC结果差异是由于固有的肿瘤行为还是诸如护理特征等因素。方法:使用国家癌症数据库(2004-2020)确定MTC I至IV期患者。男性患者根据病理分期与女性患者一对一配对。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计总生存期(OS)。采用Cox比例风险模型估计生理性别与OS的关系。结果:该研究匹配了4062例患者(女性2031例,男性2031例)。中位年龄为55岁(四分位数范围为43-66岁)。年龄、种族、合并症评分和护理特征(如诊断时间和手术类型)无性别差异(均p < 0.05)。病理分期以IVA期为主(35.5%),其次为I期(24.7%)和III期(18.9%)。女性患者未经调整的10年OS为81.1%(95%可信区间[CI], 78.7-83.2%),男性患者为69.6% (95% CI 66.8-72.3%) (p < 0.001, log-rank)。II期、III期和IVA期男性患者的生存率明显较差(均p < 0.05)。多变量调整后,男性患者的死亡风险比女性患者高81%(风险比[HR], 1.81, 95% CI 1.50-2.20; p < 0.001)。结论:尽管进行了患者匹配和多种因素的调整,男性MTC患者的生存率仍低于匹配的女性患者。这些发现表明,MTC行为因性别而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信