Hesham Radwan, Zeiad Yousry Fayed, Tarek Elserry, Mazen T Alkarras, Ali Shalash, Zahraa Hassan Shehata, Nour Walid Noureldin, Andrew Metry, Ahmed Kamel Basha
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease in Egypt.","authors":"Hesham Radwan, Zeiad Yousry Fayed, Tarek Elserry, Mazen T Alkarras, Ali Shalash, Zahraa Hassan Shehata, Nour Walid Noureldin, Andrew Metry, Ahmed Kamel Basha","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00999-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven efficacy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and is the current standard of care for these patients. However, its cost-effectiveness in low- and middle-income settings has not been assessed before.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of DBS compared with best medical therapy (BMT) in advanced PD from a societal perspective in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a Markov model with a 15-year time horizon and annual cycles to compare DBS with BMT. The cohort was aged 55-years-old at model entry and transitioned between three states: DBS, BMT, or death. Effectiveness was measured by improvement in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and reduction in drug doses. The main outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) mapped from the UPDRS scores. The model included medical, informal care, and indirect costs. Both costs and utilities were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS had yielded an increase of 1.4 QALYs per patient at an additional cost of 1,159,150 Egyptian pounds (EGP)/patient ($25,566). This results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 830,726 EGP/QALY ($18,322/QALY). Patients with DBS have lower costs for medications, hospitalizations, informal care, and productivity loss. The main cost driver in the DBS arm is the device and implantation procedure costs, which accounted for 70% of total costs. The model was most sensitive to informal care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DBS markedly improves the quality of life for advanced patients with PD and reduces informal care and indirect costs. However, at its current price, the ICER exceeds the Egyptian cost-effectiveness threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00999-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven efficacy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and is the current standard of care for these patients. However, its cost-effectiveness in low- and middle-income settings has not been assessed before.
Objectives: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of DBS compared with best medical therapy (BMT) in advanced PD from a societal perspective in Egypt.
Methods: We developed a Markov model with a 15-year time horizon and annual cycles to compare DBS with BMT. The cohort was aged 55-years-old at model entry and transitioned between three states: DBS, BMT, or death. Effectiveness was measured by improvement in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and reduction in drug doses. The main outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) mapped from the UPDRS scores. The model included medical, informal care, and indirect costs. Both costs and utilities were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%.
Results: DBS had yielded an increase of 1.4 QALYs per patient at an additional cost of 1,159,150 Egyptian pounds (EGP)/patient ($25,566). This results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 830,726 EGP/QALY ($18,322/QALY). Patients with DBS have lower costs for medications, hospitalizations, informal care, and productivity loss. The main cost driver in the DBS arm is the device and implantation procedure costs, which accounted for 70% of total costs. The model was most sensitive to informal care costs.
Conclusions: DBS markedly improves the quality of life for advanced patients with PD and reduces informal care and indirect costs. However, at its current price, the ICER exceeds the Egyptian cost-effectiveness threshold.
期刊介绍:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy.
While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.