Diffusion Restriction in Wilson's Disease: A Radiological Pointer Toward Clinically Severe Disease.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Divyani Garg, Shariq Ahmad Shah, Ayush Agarwal, Divya M Radhakrishnan, Roopa Rajan, Achal Kumar Srivastava, Ajay Garg
{"title":"Diffusion Restriction in Wilson's Disease: A Radiological Pointer Toward Clinically Severe Disease.","authors":"Divyani Garg, Shariq Ahmad Shah, Ayush Agarwal, Divya M Radhakrishnan, Roopa Rajan, Achal Kumar Srivastava, Ajay Garg","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_483_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to abnormal hepatic copper transport, leading to copper accumulation in the liver, brain, and other tissues. Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are valuable for diagnosis, the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) remains underexplored in WD. The study aims to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of diffusion restriction on MRI in WD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Clinicodemographic and MRI findings of patients diagnosed with WD based on a modified Leipzig score cut-off of 4 were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with diffusion restriction (WDDR+) and without diffusion restriction (WDDR-) were compared using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients with WD, 17 (18.7%) demonstrated MRI diffusion restriction. WDDR+ were noted to have a lower median age at symptom onset (14 [9-17] versus 15 [14-23] years; P = 0.020) and presentation (15 [13-20] years versus 19 [15-25.5] years; P = 0.022) compared to WDDR-. WDDR+ had a higher modified Leipzig score compared to WDDR- (5 [4-5] versus 7 [5-8]; P = 0.001). They also had significantly higher Global Assessment Scale (GAS) for WD (32.5 [30-37]) compared to WDDR- (19 [13-22]) (P < 0.001). WDDR+ had significantly higher proportions of patients with dysphagia (10/17, 58.8% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001) and portal hypertension (8/17, 47.1% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001). WDDR+ also experienced significantly higher rates of early neurological deterioration (END) (23.5% versus 6.6%, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diffusion restriction may hence serve as a pointer toward more severe neurological and hepatic involvement in WD, indicating the need for close supervision in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_483_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to abnormal hepatic copper transport, leading to copper accumulation in the liver, brain, and other tissues. Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are valuable for diagnosis, the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) remains underexplored in WD. The study aims to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of diffusion restriction on MRI in WD.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Clinicodemographic and MRI findings of patients diagnosed with WD based on a modified Leipzig score cut-off of 4 were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with diffusion restriction (WDDR+) and without diffusion restriction (WDDR-) were compared using statistical tests.

Results: Of 91 patients with WD, 17 (18.7%) demonstrated MRI diffusion restriction. WDDR+ were noted to have a lower median age at symptom onset (14 [9-17] versus 15 [14-23] years; P = 0.020) and presentation (15 [13-20] years versus 19 [15-25.5] years; P = 0.022) compared to WDDR-. WDDR+ had a higher modified Leipzig score compared to WDDR- (5 [4-5] versus 7 [5-8]; P = 0.001). They also had significantly higher Global Assessment Scale (GAS) for WD (32.5 [30-37]) compared to WDDR- (19 [13-22]) (P < 0.001). WDDR+ had significantly higher proportions of patients with dysphagia (10/17, 58.8% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001) and portal hypertension (8/17, 47.1% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001). WDDR+ also experienced significantly higher rates of early neurological deterioration (END) (23.5% versus 6.6%, P = 0.04).

Conclusions: Diffusion restriction may hence serve as a pointer toward more severe neurological and hepatic involvement in WD, indicating the need for close supervision in this group of patients.

肝豆状核变性弥散受限:临床重症的影像学指标。
背景和目的:威尔逊病(WD)是一种罕见的常染色体隐性遗传病,由于肝脏铜转运异常,导致铜在肝脏、脑和其他组织中积累。尽管传统的磁共振成像(MRI)特征对诊断有价值,但弥散加权成像(DWI)在WD中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估弥散限制在WD MRI上的患病率和临床相关性。方法:采用单中心回顾性研究。根据改良的莱比锡评分临界值4分,对诊断为WD的患者的临床人口学和MRI结果进行分析。弥散受限患者(WDDR+)和无弥散受限患者(WDDR-)的特征采用统计学检验进行比较。结果:91例WD患者中,17例(18.7%)MRI表现为弥散受限。与WDDR-相比,WDDR+患者出现症状时的中位年龄(14[9-17]比15[14-23]岁,P = 0.020)和表现(15[13-20]岁比19[15-25.5]岁,P = 0.022)均较低。与WDDR-相比,WDDR+具有更高的修正莱比锡评分(5[4-5]对7 [5-8];P = 0.001)。与WDDR-(19[13-22])相比,他们的WD全球评估量表(GAS)(32.5[30-37])也显著更高(P < 0.001)。WDDR+患者出现吞咽困难(10/17,58.8%比6/74,8.1%,P < 0.001)和门静脉高压症(8/17,47.1%比6/74,8.1%,P < 0.001)的比例显著高于WDDR+。WDDR+组的早期神经功能恶化率(END)也明显更高(23.5%比6.6%,P = 0.04)。结论:因此,弥散限制可能是WD更严重的神经和肝脏受累的指标,表明需要对这组患者进行密切监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信