Divyani Garg, Shariq Ahmad Shah, Ayush Agarwal, Divya M Radhakrishnan, Roopa Rajan, Achal Kumar Srivastava, Ajay Garg
{"title":"Diffusion Restriction in Wilson's Disease: A Radiological Pointer Toward Clinically Severe Disease.","authors":"Divyani Garg, Shariq Ahmad Shah, Ayush Agarwal, Divya M Radhakrishnan, Roopa Rajan, Achal Kumar Srivastava, Ajay Garg","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_483_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to abnormal hepatic copper transport, leading to copper accumulation in the liver, brain, and other tissues. Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are valuable for diagnosis, the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) remains underexplored in WD. The study aims to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of diffusion restriction on MRI in WD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Clinicodemographic and MRI findings of patients diagnosed with WD based on a modified Leipzig score cut-off of 4 were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with diffusion restriction (WDDR+) and without diffusion restriction (WDDR-) were compared using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients with WD, 17 (18.7%) demonstrated MRI diffusion restriction. WDDR+ were noted to have a lower median age at symptom onset (14 [9-17] versus 15 [14-23] years; P = 0.020) and presentation (15 [13-20] years versus 19 [15-25.5] years; P = 0.022) compared to WDDR-. WDDR+ had a higher modified Leipzig score compared to WDDR- (5 [4-5] versus 7 [5-8]; P = 0.001). They also had significantly higher Global Assessment Scale (GAS) for WD (32.5 [30-37]) compared to WDDR- (19 [13-22]) (P < 0.001). WDDR+ had significantly higher proportions of patients with dysphagia (10/17, 58.8% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001) and portal hypertension (8/17, 47.1% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001). WDDR+ also experienced significantly higher rates of early neurological deterioration (END) (23.5% versus 6.6%, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diffusion restriction may hence serve as a pointer toward more severe neurological and hepatic involvement in WD, indicating the need for close supervision in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_483_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to abnormal hepatic copper transport, leading to copper accumulation in the liver, brain, and other tissues. Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are valuable for diagnosis, the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) remains underexplored in WD. The study aims to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of diffusion restriction on MRI in WD.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Clinicodemographic and MRI findings of patients diagnosed with WD based on a modified Leipzig score cut-off of 4 were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with diffusion restriction (WDDR+) and without diffusion restriction (WDDR-) were compared using statistical tests.
Results: Of 91 patients with WD, 17 (18.7%) demonstrated MRI diffusion restriction. WDDR+ were noted to have a lower median age at symptom onset (14 [9-17] versus 15 [14-23] years; P = 0.020) and presentation (15 [13-20] years versus 19 [15-25.5] years; P = 0.022) compared to WDDR-. WDDR+ had a higher modified Leipzig score compared to WDDR- (5 [4-5] versus 7 [5-8]; P = 0.001). They also had significantly higher Global Assessment Scale (GAS) for WD (32.5 [30-37]) compared to WDDR- (19 [13-22]) (P < 0.001). WDDR+ had significantly higher proportions of patients with dysphagia (10/17, 58.8% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001) and portal hypertension (8/17, 47.1% versus 6/74, 8.1%; P < 0.001). WDDR+ also experienced significantly higher rates of early neurological deterioration (END) (23.5% versus 6.6%, P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Diffusion restriction may hence serve as a pointer toward more severe neurological and hepatic involvement in WD, indicating the need for close supervision in this group of patients.
期刊介绍:
The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.