Eduardo B DE Sousa, Renata Akemi M Matsui, Leonardo C Boldrini, Leandra S Baptista, José Mauro Granjeiro
{"title":"Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee: an overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Eduardo B DE Sousa, Renata Akemi M Matsui, Leonardo C Boldrini, Leandra S Baptista, José Mauro Granjeiro","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202520241426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no consensus on the ideal type, dose, expansion, and differentiation of MSCs for treating knee cartilage defects. Our goal was to perform an overview of systematic reviews regarding the use of MSCs for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. The overview of systematic reviews followed the Population (patients aged between 18 and 50 years with traumatic knee articular cartilage lesions), Intervention (MSCs treatment), Comparison (autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture), and Outcomes (magnetic resonance imaging or second-look knee arthroscopy) matrix. No language restrictions were applied. We assessed methodological quality, reporting standards, and evidence levels. A total of 529 records were retrieved from six databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included, and three were updated with recent data. Most reviews suggested a positive effect of MSCs on cartilage regeneration; however, considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding MSC source, preparation methods, and outcome measures. MSCs show promise in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Nonetheless, due to methodological differences and limited high-quality evidence, no standardized clinical protocol can yet be recommended. Further research is needed to establish consensus and guide clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"97 3","pages":"e20241426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520241426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is no consensus on the ideal type, dose, expansion, and differentiation of MSCs for treating knee cartilage defects. Our goal was to perform an overview of systematic reviews regarding the use of MSCs for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. The overview of systematic reviews followed the Population (patients aged between 18 and 50 years with traumatic knee articular cartilage lesions), Intervention (MSCs treatment), Comparison (autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture), and Outcomes (magnetic resonance imaging or second-look knee arthroscopy) matrix. No language restrictions were applied. We assessed methodological quality, reporting standards, and evidence levels. A total of 529 records were retrieved from six databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included, and three were updated with recent data. Most reviews suggested a positive effect of MSCs on cartilage regeneration; however, considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding MSC source, preparation methods, and outcome measures. MSCs show promise in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Nonetheless, due to methodological differences and limited high-quality evidence, no standardized clinical protocol can yet be recommended. Further research is needed to establish consensus and guide clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence.
Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.