Features of successful medication review and deprescribing interventions for fall prevention in residential aged care facilities: an intervention component analysis of an updated systematic review.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jenni Suen, Sujita Narayan, Lotta J Seppala, Nathalie van der Velde, Catherine Sherrington, Katy Sutcliffe, Ian D Cameron, Dylan Kneale, Suzanne Marie Dyer
{"title":"Features of successful medication review and deprescribing interventions for fall prevention in residential aged care facilities: an intervention component analysis of an updated systematic review.","authors":"Jenni Suen, Sujita Narayan, Lotta J Seppala, Nathalie van der Velde, Catherine Sherrington, Katy Sutcliffe, Ian D Cameron, Dylan Kneale, Suzanne Marie Dyer","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication review and deprescribing are common fall prevention strategies, as falls risk increasing drugs and polypharmacy are potentially modifiable falls risk factors. We sought to understand why some trials in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) testing medication review/deprescribing reduced falls whilst others did not. We used intervention component analysis (ICA) to develop a theory of the key feature(s) from the trialists' perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medication review/deprescribing as a single falls prevention intervention in RACFs, were identified via a Cochrane review and additional database searches to 1 April 2025. ICA was conducted with inductive thematic analysis of the Discussion sections of trial publications. Alignment between themes/subthemes and trial outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen trials from six countries were included. Trialists perceived that medication review/deprescribing interventions should include a tool (i.e. algorithm/list of medications) to facilitate decisions between clinicians on the appropriateness of resident's prescriptions, with at least one prescriber from the residents' usual care team involved in decisions and implementation of medication changes, reviewing medications together at least 6 monthly. These features were present in 100% (3/3) successful trials and 20% (2/10) unsuccessful trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICA indicated using a tool as a guide amongst clinicians, at least six monthly and including at least one prescriber from the usual care team, could be an important combination of features to improve intervention success. This approach which aligns with recent World Falls Guidelines should be tested in future RCTs of medication optimisation for people living in RACFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication review and deprescribing are common fall prevention strategies, as falls risk increasing drugs and polypharmacy are potentially modifiable falls risk factors. We sought to understand why some trials in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) testing medication review/deprescribing reduced falls whilst others did not. We used intervention component analysis (ICA) to develop a theory of the key feature(s) from the trialists' perspective.

Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medication review/deprescribing as a single falls prevention intervention in RACFs, were identified via a Cochrane review and additional database searches to 1 April 2025. ICA was conducted with inductive thematic analysis of the Discussion sections of trial publications. Alignment between themes/subthemes and trial outcomes were examined.

Results: Thirteen trials from six countries were included. Trialists perceived that medication review/deprescribing interventions should include a tool (i.e. algorithm/list of medications) to facilitate decisions between clinicians on the appropriateness of resident's prescriptions, with at least one prescriber from the residents' usual care team involved in decisions and implementation of medication changes, reviewing medications together at least 6 monthly. These features were present in 100% (3/3) successful trials and 20% (2/10) unsuccessful trials.

Conclusions: ICA indicated using a tool as a guide amongst clinicians, at least six monthly and including at least one prescriber from the usual care team, could be an important combination of features to improve intervention success. This approach which aligns with recent World Falls Guidelines should be tested in future RCTs of medication optimisation for people living in RACFs.

Abstract Image

住院老年护理机构预防跌倒成功的药物评价和处方化干预的特征:一项最新系统评价的干预成分分析。
背景:药物审查和处方解除是常见的跌倒预防策略,因为增加跌倒风险的药物和多种药物是潜在的可改变的跌倒危险因素。我们试图理解为什么一些试验在住宅老年护理机构(racf)测试药物审查/处方减少跌倒,而其他没有。我们使用干预成分分析(ICA)从试验者的角度发展了一个关键特征的理论。方法:随机对照试验(rct)通过Cochrane综述和截至2025年4月1日的额外数据库检索确定了评估药物回顾/处方解除作为racf单一跌倒预防干预措施的随机对照试验(rct)。ICA对试验出版物的讨论部分进行了归纳性专题分析。检查主题/次主题与试验结果之间的一致性。结果:纳入了来自6个国家的13项试验。试验人员认为,药物审查/减少处方干预措施应该包括一个工具(即算法/药物清单),以促进临床医生之间对住院医生处方的适当性做出决定,至少有一名来自住院医生的常规护理团队的开处方者参与药物变更的决策和实施,一起审查药物至少6个月。这些特征出现在100%(3/3)成功试验和20%(2/10)不成功试验中。结论:ICA表明在临床医生中使用一种工具作为指导,至少六个月,包括至少一名来自常规护理团队的处方者,可能是提高干预成功率的重要特征组合。这种方法与最近的《世界瀑布指南》一致,应在未来的rct中对racf患者进行药物优化试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信