{"title":"Global adoption of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome-resistant pigs will have significant economic and market impacts.","authors":"Jayson L Lusk","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the global economic impacts of adopting gene-edited pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) on pork markets and producer profitability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model linking hog supply to consumer pork demand in 6 global regions, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, the US, and the rest of the world, was constructed and parametrized using pork production and trade statistics, published supply and demand elasticities, PRRS prevalence rates, and productivity metrics by PRRS health status. The model projects changes in pork prices, production, trade, and producer profits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the baseline scenario (70% adoption over 12 years), assuming no change in pork demand or additional cost of swine genetics, the marginal cost of production declines and pork prices fall while pork production increases in adopting countries by 11% in China to 7% in the US and Canada, and pork production falls in nonadopting countries. In the 15th year after initial adoption, profits for pork producers increase, ranging from $33/head in China to $15/head in Canada relative to preadoption baseline. Producers in the rest of the world, who are assumed not to adopt, are less profitable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adoption of PRRS-resistant pigs is likely to significantly increase productivity, which translates into market impacts that are substantial and likely positive for the adopting producers, assuming there is no significant demand reduction or exorbitant increase in the cost of swine genetics.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Pork producers who adopt PRRS-resistant pigs experience higher productivity and lower veterinary costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the global economic impacts of adopting gene-edited pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) on pork markets and producer profitability.
Methods: A model linking hog supply to consumer pork demand in 6 global regions, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, the US, and the rest of the world, was constructed and parametrized using pork production and trade statistics, published supply and demand elasticities, PRRS prevalence rates, and productivity metrics by PRRS health status. The model projects changes in pork prices, production, trade, and producer profits.
Results: In the baseline scenario (70% adoption over 12 years), assuming no change in pork demand or additional cost of swine genetics, the marginal cost of production declines and pork prices fall while pork production increases in adopting countries by 11% in China to 7% in the US and Canada, and pork production falls in nonadopting countries. In the 15th year after initial adoption, profits for pork producers increase, ranging from $33/head in China to $15/head in Canada relative to preadoption baseline. Producers in the rest of the world, who are assumed not to adopt, are less profitable.
Conclusions: The adoption of PRRS-resistant pigs is likely to significantly increase productivity, which translates into market impacts that are substantial and likely positive for the adopting producers, assuming there is no significant demand reduction or exorbitant increase in the cost of swine genetics.
Clinical relevance: Pork producers who adopt PRRS-resistant pigs experience higher productivity and lower veterinary costs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.